Brian Taba

dblp:75/3868 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-7831-1139ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
7 papers
Emerging computing paradigms · 64% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 17% Electronic design automation · 15%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing
0.752016
Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications · SC 2016
TrueNorth: Design and Tool Flow of a 65 mW 1 Million Neuron Programmable Neurosynaptic Chip · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2015
Real-Time Scalable Cortical Computing at 46 Giga-Synaptic OPS/Watt with ~100× Speedup in Time-to-Solution and ~100, 000× Reduction in Energy-to-Solution · SC 2014
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic hardware
0.732022
A Low Power, Fully Event-Based Gesture Recognition System · CVPR 2017
Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications · SC 2016
Event-Based Vision: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
brain-inspired computing
0.212016
Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications · SC 2016
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
neural network mapping
0.212015
TrueNorth: Design and Tool Flow of a 65 mW 1 Million Neuron Programmable Neurosynaptic Chip · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2015
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.212015
TrueNorth: Design and Tool Flow of a 65 mW 1 Million Neuron Programmable Neurosynaptic Chip · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2015
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement
0.212015
TrueNorth: Design and Tool Flow of a 65 mW 1 Million Neuron Programmable Neurosynaptic Chip · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry
0.212022
Event-Based Vision: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
spiking neural network
0.212022
Event-Based Vision: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Interaction techniques and input › input sensing
gesture recognition
0.112017
A Low Power, Fully Event-Based Gesture Recognition System · CVPR 2017
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › neural network hardware
brain-inspired computing accelerator
0.112014
Real-Time Scalable Cortical Computing at 46 Giga-Synaptic OPS/Watt with ~100× Speedup in Time-to-Solution and ~100, 000× Reduction in Energy-to-Solution · SC 2014
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.112014
Real-Time Scalable Cortical Computing at 46 Giga-Synaptic OPS/Watt with ~100× Speedup in Time-to-Solution and ~100, 000× Reduction in Energy-to-Solution · SC 2014
Integrated circuit design › analog and mixed-signal circuits
analog VLSI
0.022005
Silicon growth cones map silicon retina · NIPS 2005
Topographic Map Formation by Silicon Growth Cones · NIPS 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spiking neural network · 1.7learning-based event processing · 1.1convolutional neural network · 0.6software ecosystem · 0.2scalable systems · 0.2mixed asynchronous-synchronous circuit design · 0.2CAD placement tool adaptation · 0.2event-driven kernel · 0.2chip tiling · 0.2activity-dependent axon remodeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 IBM NorthPole Neural Inference Machine
Dharmendra S. Modha, Filipp Akopyan, Alexander Andreopoulos, Rathinakumar Appuswamy, John V. Arthur, Andrew S. Cassidy, Pallab Datta, Michael DeBole, Steven K. Esser, Carlos Ortega Otero, Jun Sawada, Brian Taba, Arnon Amir, Deepika Bablani, Peter J. Carlson, Myron Flickner, Rajamohan Gandhasri, Guillaume Garreau, Megumi Ito, Jennifer L. Klamo, Jeffrey A. Kusnitz, Nathaniel J. McClatchey, Jeffrey L. McKinstry, Yutaka Y. Nakamura, Tapan K. Nayak, William P. Risk, Kai Schleupen, Ben Shaw 0001, Jay Sivagnaname, Daniel F. Smith, Ignacio G. Terrizzano, Takanori Ueda
HCS12
2022 Event-Based Vision: A Survey
abstract
Event cameras are bio-inspired sensors that differ from conventional frame cameras: Instead of capturing images at a fixed rate, they asynchronously measure per-pixel brightness changes, and output a stream of events that encode the time, location and sign of the brightness changes. Event cameras offer attractive properties compared to traditional cameras: high temporal resolution (in the order of μs), very high dynamic range (140 dB versus 60 dB), low power consumption, and high pixel bandwidth (on the order of kHz) resulting in reduced motion blur. Hence, event cameras have a large potential for robotics and computer vision in challenging scenarios for traditional cameras, such as low-latency, high speed, and high dynamic range. However, novel methods are required to process the unconventional output of these sensors in order to unlock their potential. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging field of event-based vision, with a focus on the applications and the algorithms developed to unlock the outstanding properties of event cameras. We present event cameras from their working principle, the actual sensors that are available and the tasks that they have been used for, from low-level vision (feature detection and tracking, optic flow, etc.) to high-level vision (reconstruction, segmentation, recognition). We also discuss the techniques developed to process events, including learning-based techniques, as well as specialized processors for these novel sensors, such as spiking neural networks. Additionally, we highlight the challenges that remain to be tackled and the opportunities that lie ahead in the search for a more efficient, bio-inspired way for machines to perceive and interact with the world.
Guillermo Gallego 0002, Tobi Delbruck, Garrick Orchard, Chiara Bartolozzi, Brian Taba, Andrea Censi, Stefan Leutenegger, Andrew J. Davison, Jörg Conradt, Kostas Daniilidis, Davide Scaramuzza 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.5
2017 A Low Power, Fully Event-Based Gesture Recognition System
abstract
We present the first gesture recognition system implemented end-to-end on event-based hardware, using a TrueNorth neurosynaptic processor to recognize hand gestures in real-time at low power from events streamed live by a Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS). The biologically inspired DVS transmits data only when a pixel detects a change, unlike traditional frame-based cameras which sample every pixel at a fixed frame rate. This sparse, asynchronous data representation lets event-based cameras operate at much lower power than frame-based cameras. However, much of the energy efficiency is lost if, as in previous work, the event stream is interpreted by conventional synchronous processors. Here, for the first time, we process a live DVS event stream using TrueNorth, a natively event-based processor with 1 million spiking neurons. Configured here as a convolutional neural network (CNN), the TrueNorth chip identifies the onset of a gesture with a latency of 105 ms while consuming less than 200 mW. The CNN achieves 96.5% out-of-sample accuracy on a newly collected DVS dataset (DvsGesture) comprising 11 hand gesture categories from 29 subjects under 3 illumination conditions.
Arnon Amir, Brian Taba, David J. Berg, Timothy Melano, Jeffrey L. McKinstry, Carmelo di Nolfo, Tapan K. Nayak, Alexander Andreopoulos, Guillaume Garreau, Marcela Mendoza, Jeffrey A. Kusnitz, Michael DeBole, Steven K. Esser, Tobi Delbruck, Myron Flickner, Dharmendra S. Modha
CVPR2
2016 Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications
abstract
Abstract not provided
Jun Sawada, Filipp Akopyan, Andrew S. Cassidy, Brian Taba, Michael DeBole, Pallab Datta, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, Arnon Amir, John V. Arthur, Alexander Andreopoulos, Rathinakumar Appuswamy, Heinz Baier, Davis Barch, David J. Berg, Carmelo di Nolfo, Steven K. Esser, Myron Flickner, Thomas A. Horvath, Bryan L. Jackson, Jeffrey A. Kusnitz, Scott Lekuch, Michael Mastro, Timothy Melano, Paul Merolla, Steven E. Millman, Tapan K. Nayak, Norm Pass, Hartmut Penner, William P. Risk, Kai Schleupen, Ben Shaw 0001, Hayley Wu, Brian Giera, Adam Moody, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Brian Van Essen, Eric X. Wang, David P. Widemann, William E. Murphy, Jamie K. Infantolino, James A. Ross, Dale R. Shires, Manuel M. Vindiola, Raju Namburu, Dharmendra S. Modha
SC4
2015 TrueNorth: Design and Tool Flow of a 65 mW 1 Million Neuron Programmable Neurosynaptic Chip
abstract
The new era of cognitive computing brings forth the grand challenge of developing systems capable of processing massive amounts of noisy multisensory data. This type of intelligent computing poses a set of constraints, including real-time operation, low-power consumption and scalability, which require a radical departure from conventional system design. Brain-inspired architectures offer tremendous promise in this area. To this end, we developed TrueNorth, a 65 mW real-time neurosynaptic processor that implements a non-von Neumann, low-power, highly-parallel, scalable, and defect-tolerant architecture. With 4096 neurosynaptic cores, the TrueNorth chip contains 1 million digital neurons and 256 million synapses tightly interconnected by an event-driven routing infrastructure. The fully digital 5.4 billion transistor implementation leverages existing CMOS scaling trends, while ensuring one-to-one correspondence between hardware and software. With such aggressive design metrics and the TrueNorth architecture breaking path with prevailing architectures, it is clear that conventional computer-aided design (CAD) tools could not be used for the design. As a result, we developed a novel design methodology that includes mixed asynchronous-synchronous circuits and a complete tool flow for building an event-driven, low-power neurosynaptic chip. The TrueNorth chip is fully configurable in terms of connectivity and neural parameters to allow custom configurations for a wide range of cognitive and sensory perception applications. To reduce the system's communication energy, we have adapted existing application-agnostic very large-scale integration CAD placement tools for mapping logical neural networks to the physical neurosynaptic core locations on the TrueNorth chips. With that, we have successfully demonstrated the use of TrueNorth-based systems in multiple applications, including visual object recognition, with higher performance and orders of magnitude lower power consumption than the same algorithms run on von Neumann architectures. The TrueNorth chip and its tool flow serve as building blocks for future cognitive systems, and give designers an opportunity to develop novel brain-inspired architectures and systems based on the knowledge obtained from this paper.
Filipp Akopyan, Jun Sawada, Andrew S. Cassidy, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, John V. Arthur, Paul Merolla, Nabil Imam, Yutaka Y. Nakamura, Pallab Datta, Gi-Joon Nam, Brian Taba, Michael P. Beakes, Bernard Brezzo, Jente B. Kuang, Rajit Manohar, William P. Risk, Bryan L. Jackson, Dharmendra S. Modha
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.11
2014 Real-Time Scalable Cortical Computing at 46 Giga-Synaptic OPS/Watt with ~100× Speedup in Time-to-Solution and ~100, 000× Reduction in Energy-to-Solution
abstract
Drawing on neuroscience, we have developed a parallel, event-driven kernel for neurosynaptic computation, that is efficient with respect to computation, memory, and communication. Building on the previously demonstrated highly optimized software expression of the kernel, here, we demonstrate True North, a co-designed silicon expression of the kernel. True North achieves five orders of magnitude reduction in energy to-solution and two orders of magnitude speedup in time-to solution, when running computer vision applications and complex recurrent neural network simulations. Breaking path with the von Neumann architecture, True North is a 4,096 core, 1 million neuron, and 256 million synapse brain-inspired neurosynaptic processor, that consumes 65mW of power running at real-time and delivers performance of 46 Giga-Synaptic OPS/Watt. We demonstrate seamless tiling of True North chips into arrays, forming a foundation for cortex-like scalability. True North's unprecedented time-to-solution, energy-to-solution, size, scalability, and performance combined with the underlying flexibility of the kernel enable a broad range of cognitive applications.
Andrew S. Cassidy, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, Filipp Akopyan, Jun Sawada, John V. Arthur, Paul Merolla, Pallab Datta, Marc González 0001, Brian Taba, Alexander Andreopoulos, Arnon Amir, Steven K. Esser, Jeffrey A. Kusnitz, Rathinakumar Appuswamy, Chuck Haymes, Bernard Brezzo, Roger Moussalli, Ralph Bellofatto, Christian W. Baks, Michael Mastro, Kai Schleupen, Charles E. Cox, Ken Inoue, Steven E. Millman, Nabil Imam, Emmett McQuinn, Yutaka Y. Nakamura, Ivan Vo, Chen Guok, Don Nguyen, Scott Lekuch, Sameh W. Asaad, Daniel J. Friedman, Bryan L. Jackson, Myron Flickner, William P. Risk, Rajit Manohar, Dharmendra S. Modha
SC9
2005 Balancing Guidance Range and Strength Optimizes Self-organization by Silicon Growth Cones
Brian Taba, Kwabena Boahen 0001
ICANN (2)1
2005 Silicon growth cones map silicon retina
abstract
We demonstrate the first fully hardware implementation of retinotopic self-organization, from photon transduction to neural map formation. A silicon retina transduces patterned illumination into correlated spike trains that drive a population of silicon growth cones to automatically wire a topographic mapping by migrating toward sources of a diffusible guidance cue that is released by postsynaptic spikes. We varied the pat- tern of illumination to steer growth cones projected by different retinal ganglion cell types to self-organize segregated or coordinated retinotopic maps.
Brian Taba, Kwabena Boahen 0001
NIPS1
2002 Topographic Map Formation by Silicon Growth Cones
abstract
We describe a self-configuring neuromorphic chip that uses a model of activity-dependent axon remodeling to automatically wire topographic maps based solely on input correlations. Axons are guided by growth cones, which are modeled in analog VLSI for the first time. Growth cones migrate up neurotropin gradients, which are represented by charge diffusing in transistor channels. Virtual axons move by rerouting address-events. We refined an initially gross topographic projection by simulating retinal wave input. 1 Neuromorphic Systems Neuromorphic engineers are attempting to match the computational efficiency of biological systems by morphing neurocircuitry into silicon circuits [1]. One of the most detailed implementations to date is the silicon retina described in [2] . This chip comprises thirteen different cell types, each of which must be individually and painstakingly wired. While this circuit-level approach has been very successful in sensory systems, it is less helpful when modeling largely unelucidated and exceedingly plastic higher processing centers in cortex. Instead of an explicit blueprint for every cortical area, what is needed is a developmental rule that can wire complex circuits from minimal specifications. One candidate is the famous "cells that fire together wire together" rule, which strengthens excitatory connections between coactive presynaptic and postsynaptic cells. We implemented a self-rewiring scheme of this type in silicon, taking our cue from axon remodeling during development.
Brian Taba, Kwabena Boahen 0001
NIPS1