Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

K. Bruce Erickson

dblp:75/4479 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
discrete-event simulation
0.011994
Optimizing Static Calendar Queues · FOCS 1994
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.011994
Optimizing Static Calendar Queues · FOCS 1994
Algorithms and data structures
priority queues
0.011994
Optimizing Static Calendar Queues · FOCS 1994
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011994
Optimizing Static Calendar Queues · FOCS 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.0analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Optimizing Static Calendar Queues
abstract
The calendar queue is an important implementation of a priority queue which is particularly useful in discrete event simulators. In this paper we present an analysis of the static calendar queue which maintains N active events. A step of the discrete event simulator removes and processes the event with the smallest associated time and inserts a new event whose associated time is the time of the removed event plus a random increment with mean /spl mu/. We demonstrate that for the infinite bucket calendar queue the optimal bucket width is approximately /spl delta//sub opt/=/spl radic/(2b/c)/spl mu//N where b is the time to process an empty bucket and c the incremental time to process a list element. With bucket width chosen to be /spl delta//sub opt/, the expected time to process an event is approximately minimized at the constant c+/spl radic/(2bc)+d, where d is the fixed time to process an event. We show that choosing the number of buckets to be O(N) yields a calendar queue with performance equal to or almost equal to the performance of the infinite bucket calendar queue.>
K. Bruce Erickson, Richard E. Ladner, Anthony LaMarca
FOCS1