Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tinglin Huang 0002

dblp:75/507-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8345-7772ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
negative sampling
0.812024
Does Negative Sampling Matter? a Review With Insights Into its Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.212024
Does Negative Sampling Matter? a Review With Insights Into its Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

negative sampling strategies · 0.8hard negative mining · 0.8GAN-based sampling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Does Negative Sampling Matter? a Review With Insights Into its Theory and Applications
abstract
Negative sampling has swiftly risen to prominence as a focal point of research, with wide-ranging applications spanning machine learning, computer vision, natural language processing, data mining, and recommender systems. This surge in interest prompts us to question the fundamental impact of negative sampling: Does negative sampling really matter? Is there a general framework that can incorporate all negative sampling methods? In what fields is it applied? Addressing these questions, we propose a general framework that using negative sampling. Delving into the history of negative sampling, we chart its evolution across five distinct trajectories. We dissect and categorize the strategies used to select negative sample candidates, detailing global, local, mini-batch, hop, and memory-based approaches. Our comprehensive review extends to an analysis of current negative sampling methodologies, systematically grouping them into five classifications: static, hard, GAN-based, Auxiliary-based, and In-batch. Beyond detailed categorization, we explore the practical application of negative sampling across various fields. Finally, we briefly discuss open problems and future directions for negative sampling.
Zhen Yang 0034, Ming Ding 0004, Tinglin Huang 0002, Yukuo Cen, Junshuai Song, Bin Xu 0001, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3