Eric Rodriguez

dblp:75/7015 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 70% Parallel and multicore computing · 23% Performance modeling and evaluation · 7%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › resilience
adaptive fault tolerance
0.112008
Dynasa: adapting grid applications to safety using fault-tolerant methods · HPDC 2008
Distributed systems
distributed coordination and fault tolerance
0.112008
Dynasa: adapting grid applications to safety using fault-tolerant methods · HPDC 2008
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
replication and checkpointing
0.112008
Dynasa: adapting grid applications to safety using fault-tolerant methods · HPDC 2008
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › checkpointing
coordinated checkpointing
0.112006
MPI tools and performance studies - Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI · SC 2006
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112006
MPI tools and performance studies - Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI · SC 2006
Parallel and multicore computing › MPI
fault-tolerant MPI
0.112006
MPI tools and performance studies - Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI · SC 2006
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models
message passing
0.112006
MPI tools and performance studies - Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI · SC 2006
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.012006
MPI tools and performance studies - Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI · SC 2006
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › parallel benchmark suites
NAS parallel benchmarks
0.012006
MPI tools and performance studies - Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI · SC 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

replication · 0.2adaptive checkpointing · 0.2non-blocking checkpointing · 0.1blocking checkpointing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 High-Resolution Detection of Stratospheric Aerosols in CALIPSO Atmospheric Lidar Data Facilitated by the CALIOP-Density-Dimension Algorithm
abstract
The objective of this paper is to demonstrate a new capability to detect faint stratospheric aerosols in atmospheric lidar data from NASA’s Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Mission (12 June 2006 30 June 2023) at high resolution. Faint aerosols from wildfires, distant volcanic eruptions, and Asian and Saharan dust storms play important roles in the Earth-Atmosphere system, as they provide essential air quality and pollution, airline safety, climate radiative forcing, monitoring of fires and volcanic eruptions, environmental safety, and weather forecasting. Tenuous aerosols are recorded in the CALIOP atmospheric lidar data from the CALIPSO mission, but especially extremely faint stratospheric aerosol layers often escape detection and classification partly or entirely in the current CALIOP data analysis scheme. To solve this problem, we introduce a new algorithm for detection and height determination of atmospheric layers, the Density-Dimension Algorithm for CALIOP data analysis (CALIOP-DDA). The DDA is an auto-adaptive algorithm that builds on concepts from artificial intelligence and spatial statistics. Core steps are calculation of a density field and application of a threshold function for signal-noise separation. Stratospheric aerosol detection is aided by the tropopause split concept. The CALIOP-DDA facilitates detection of extremely faint stratospheric aerosols from various sources, including distant wildfires and volcanic eruptions, in night-time and day-time CALIOP data, even in presence of complex types of other cloud and aerosol layers across a large range of optical thicknesses, while retaining the full 334m along-track, 30m height resolution, without creating false positives. CALIOP-DDA results are evaluated by comparison to layer heights derived from airborne validation experiments, conducted using the Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL). In conclusion, the CALIOP-DDA holds promise as the algorithmic basis for a future improved, high-resolution CALIPSO data product.
Ute C. Herzfeld, Thomas M. Trantow, Mark A. Vaughan, Stephen Palm, Camden Opfer, Eric Rodriguez
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.6
2010 Adapting grid applications to safety using fault-tolerant methods: Design, implementation and evaluations
Xuanhua Shi, Jean-Louis Pazat, Eric Rodriguez, Hai Jin 0001, Hongbo Jiang 0001
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.3
2008 Dynasa: adapting grid applications to safety using fault-tolerant methods
abstract
Grid applications have been prone to encountering problems such as failures or malicious attacks during execution, due to their distributed and large-scale features. The application itself, however, has limited power to address these problems. This paper presents the design, and implementation of an adaptive framework - Dynasa, which strives to handle security problems using adaptive fault-tolerance (i.e., checkpointing and replication) during the execution of applications according to the status of the grid environments.
Xuanhua Shi, Jean-Louis Pazat, Eric Rodriguez, Hai Jin 0001, Hongbo Jiang 0001
HPDC3
2008 Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI Protocols
Darius Buntinas, Camille Coti, Thomas Hérault, Pierre Lemarinier, Laurence Pilard, Ala Rezmerita, Eric Rodriguez, Franck Cappello
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.7
2006 FAIL-MPI: How Fault-Tolerant Is Fault-Tolerant MPI?
abstract
One of the topics of paramount importance in the development of cluster and grid middleware is the impact of faults since their occurrence in grid infrastructures and in large-scale distributed systems is common. MPI (message passing interface) is a popular abstraction for programming distributed and parallel applications. FAIL (FAult Injection Language) is an abstract language for fault occurrence description capable of expressing complex and realistic fault scenarios. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of using FAIL to inject faults in a fault-tolerant MPI implementation. Our middleware, FAIL-MPI, is used to carry quantitative and qualitative faults and stress testing
William Hoarau, Pierre Lemarinier, Thomas Hérault, Eric Rodriguez, Sébastien Tixeuil, Franck Cappello
CLUSTER4
2006 MPI tools and performance studies - Blocking vs. non-blocking coordinated checkpointing for large-scale fault tolerant MPI
abstract
A long-term trend in high-performance computing is the increasing number of nodes in parallel computing platforms, which entails a higher failure probability. Fault tolerant programming environments should be used to guarantee the safe execution of critical applications. Research in fault tolerant MPI has led to the development of several fault tolerant MPI environments. Different approaches are being proposed using a variety of fault tolerant message passing protocols based on coordinated checkpointing or message logging. The most popular approach is with coordinated checkpointing. In the literature, two different concepts of coordinated checkpointing have been proposed: blocking and nonblocking. However they have never been compared quantitatively and their respective scalability remains unknown. The contribution of this paper is to provide the first comparison between these two approaches and a study of their scalability. We have implemented the two approaches within the MPICH environments and evaluate their performance using the NAS parallel benchmarks.
Camille Coti, Thomas Hérault, Pierre Lemarinier, Laurence Pilard, Ala Rezmerita, Eric Rodriguez, Franck Cappello
SC6
1997 Clinical event monitoring at the University of Pittsburgh
Michael M. Wagner 0001, Marvin C. Pankaskie, William R. Hogan, Fu-Chiang Tsui, Stuart A. Eisenstadt, Eric Rodriguez, John K. Vries
AMIA6