Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nirmesh Malviya

dblp:75/9492 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 40% Spatial and temporal data management · 40% Data stream processing · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control
recovery
0.212014
Rethinking main memory OLTP recovery · ICDE 2014
Transaction processing and concurrency control › recovery
write-ahead logging
0.212014
Rethinking main memory OLTP recovery · ICDE 2014
Data stream processing
continuous query processing
0.112011
A continuous query system for dynamic route planning · ICDE 2011
Spatial and temporal data management
road network
0.112011
A continuous query system for dynamic route planning · ICDE 2011
Spatial and temporal data management
route planning
0.112011
A continuous query system for dynamic route planning · ICDE 2011
Spatial and temporal data management
spatio-temporal query processing
0.112011
A continuous query system for dynamic route planning · ICDE 2011
Database system architecture and tuning
main-memory database
0.112014
Rethinking main memory OLTP recovery · ICDE 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

command replay · 0.2checkpointing · 0.2precomputation · 0.1approximation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Rethinking main memory OLTP recovery
abstract
Fine-grained, record-oriented write-ahead logging, as exemplified by systems like ARIES, has been the gold standard for relational database recovery. In this paper, we show that in modern high-throughput transaction processing systems, this is no longer the optimal way to recover a database system. In particular, as transaction throughputs get higher, ARIES-style logging starts to represent a non-trivial fraction of the overall transaction execution time. We propose a lighter weight, coarse-grained command logging technique which only records the transactions that were executed on the database. It then does recovery by starting from a transactionally consistent checkpoint and replaying the commands in the log as if they were new transactions. By avoiding the overhead of fine-grained logging of before and after images (both CPU complexity as well as substantial associated 110), command logging can yield significantly higher throughput at run-time. Recovery times for command logging are higher compared to an ARIEs-style physiological logging approach, but with the advent of high-availability techniques that can mask the outage of a recovering node, recovery speeds have become secondary in importance to run-time performance for most applications. We evaluated our approach on an implementation of TPCC in a main memory database system (VoltDB), and found that command logging can offer 1.5 x higher throughput than a main-memory optimized implementation of ARIEs-style physiological logging.
Nirmesh Malviya, Ariel Weisberg, Samuel Madden 0001, Michael Stonebraker
ICDE1
2011 Relational Cloud: a Database Service for the cloud
Carlo Curino, Evan P. C. Jones, Raluca A. Popa, Nirmesh Malviya, Eugene Wu 0002, Samuel Madden 0001, Hari Balakrishnan, Nickolai Zeldovich
CIDR4
2011 A continuous query system for dynamic route planning
abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of answering continuous route planning queries over a road network, in the presence of updates to the delay (cost) estimates of links. A simple approach to this problem would be to recompute the best path for all queries on arrival of every delay update. However, such a naive approach scales poorly when there are many users who have requested routes in the system. Instead, we propose two new classes of approximate techniques - K-paths and proximity measures to substantially speed up processing of the set of designated routes specified by continuous route planning queries in the face of incoming traffic delay updates. Our techniques work through a combination of pre-computation of likely good paths and by avoiding complete recalculations on every delay update, instead only sending the user new routes when delays change significantly. Based on an experimental evaluation with 7,000 drives from real taxi cabs, we found that the routes delivered by our techniques are within 5% of the best shortest path and have run times an order of magnitude or less compared to a naive approach.
Nirmesh Malviya, Samuel Madden 0001, Arnab Bhattacharya 0001
ICDE1