Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Flake

dblp:76/3871 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 69% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 30% Integrated circuit design · 0%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor
0.112006
System-level exploration tools for MPSoC designs · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation
design space exploration
0.112006
System-level exploration tools for MPSoC designs · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.012001
Panel: Your Core - My Problem? Integration and Verification of IP · DAC 2001
Electronic design automation
hardware/software co-design
0.012006
System-level exploration tools for MPSoC designs · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation
system-level design
0.012006
System-level exploration tools for MPSoC designs · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation › design management
design reuse
0.012001
Panel: Your Core - My Problem? Integration and Verification of IP · DAC 2001
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
logic simulation
0.011983
An algebra for logic strength simulation · DAC 1983
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.011983
An algebra for logic strength simulation · DAC 1983
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Verilog HDL and its ancestors and descendants
abstract
This paper describes the history of the Verilog hardware description language (HDL), including its influential predecessors and successors. Since its creation in 1984 and first sale in 1985, Verilog has completely revolutionized the design of hardware. Verilog enabled the development and wide acceptance of logic synthesis. For large-scale digital logic design, previous schematic-based techniques have transformed into textual register-transfer level (RTL) descriptions written in Verilog. As of 2018 about 80% of integrated circuit design teams worldwide use Verilog and its compatible descendant SystemVerilog.
Peter Flake, Phil Moorby, Steve Golson, Arturo Salz, Simon J. Davidmann
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1
2013 Why SystemVeriog?
Peter Flake
FDL1
2013 Systemc infrastructure and extensions
Peter Flake, Frank Oppenheimer
FDL1
2006 System-level exploration tools for MPSoC designs
abstract
In this paper, we describe the challenges users face for software development on Systems on Chip (SoC) involving multiple cores. We will briefly review the trends and challenges for MPSoC design and will derive from them the resulting requirements. We will then discuss briefly the required exploration tools and close with an analysis of which type of providers will be able to provide appropriate solutions to the MPSoC challenge. Categories and Subject Descriptors D.2.10 [Software Engineering] Design- methodologies
Peter Flake, Simon J. Davidmann, Frank Schirrmeister
DAC1
2004 SystemC and SystemVerilog: Where do They Fit? Where are They Going?
abstract
There is tremendous interest in design languages these days - and more particularly, SystemC and SystemVerilog. Sometimes the truth about design languages can be obscured by marketing and the press. This panel is meant to deepen the technical understanding of the DATE audience on the issue of design languages. It contains five technical experts - an academic expert in design languages and SystemC and SystemVerilog in particular; a language expert for each of SystemC and SystemVerilog; and a user expert for these two languages. The language experts have been heavily involved in the specification and evolution of their respective languages. The user experts have been heavily involved in developing use methodologies for these languages within their own design communities, and in applying them to real design problems. The panellists will consider the questions: 1) what are the key capabilities of these languages and what do they offer to users?; 2) which design problems are they best used for? what is their scope?; 3) how has application of these languages to real design problems improved the productivity of designers and the quality of the design results?; and 4) where should the languages develop further capabilities?.
Donatella Sciuto, Grant Martin, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, Stuart Swan, Frank Ghenassia, Peter Flake, Johny Srouji
DATE6
2001 Panel: Your Core - My Problem? Integration and Verification of IP
abstract
As the popularity of reusing existing designs--or Intellectual Property (IP)--continues to grow, design challenges escalate. The most time-consuming and critical part of IP design and reuse is verifying that it will work as it was designed to and as the user intends. Designers are pushing the limits of IP for new, distinctive and innovative applications. With this innovation come problems that need creative solutions. Product verification, for example, will become more and more important in ensuring the correctness of the design. Over the years, various solutions have come on the market, all seemingly useful, but none reducing the time or manpower it takes to verify the design. With designs becoming increasingly more complex with each new project and verification consuming up to 70 percent of a design cycle, something must be done to alleviate the bottleneck.
Gabe Moretti, Tim Hopes, Ramesh Narayanaswamy, Nanette Collins, Dave Kelf, Janick Bergeron, Ashish Dixit, Peter Flake
DAC9
2000 Superlog, a unified design language for system-on-chip
abstract
Article Free Access Share on Superlog, a unified design language for system-on-chip Authors: Peter L. Flake Co-Design Automation, Inc., San Jose, CA Co-Design Automation, Inc., San Jose, CAView Profile , Simon J. Davidmann Co-Design Automation, Inc., San Jose, CA Co-Design Automation, Inc., San Jose, CAView Profile Authors Info & Claims ASP-DAC '00: Proceedings of the 2000 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation ConferenceJanuary 2000 Pages 583–586https://doi.org/10.1145/368434.368814Published:28 January 2000Publication History 7citation248DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations7Total Downloads248Last 12 Months58Last 6 weeks9 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Peter Flake, Simon J. Davidmann
ASP-DAC1
2000 One language or more?: how can we design an SoC at a system level?
abstract
No abstract available.
Masaharu Imai, Gary Smith 0001, Steven Schulz, Karen Bartleson, Daniel Gajski, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, Peter Flake, Hiroto Yasuura
ASP-DAC7
1983 An algebra for logic strength simulation
Peter Flake, Phil Moorby, Gerry Musgrave
DAC1