Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephen J. Tapscott

dblp:76/452 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-0319-0968ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › motif discovery
discriminative motif discovery
0.212014
Discriminative motif analysis of high-throughput dataset · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.212014
Discriminative motif analysis of high-throughput dataset · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
ChIP-seq analysis
0.112014
Discriminative motif analysis of high-throughput dataset · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › motif discovery
transcription factor binding motif discovery
0.112014
Discriminative motif analysis of high-throughput dataset · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

discriminative sequence analysis · 0.2bias correction · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Discriminative motif analysis of high-throughput dataset
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput ChIP-seq studies typically identify thousands of peaks for a single transcription factor (TF). It is common for traditional motif discovery tools to predict motifs that are statistically significant against a naïve background distribution but are of questionable biological relevance. RESULTS: We describe a simple yet effective algorithm for discovering differential motifs between two sequence datasets that is effective in eliminating systematic biases and scalable to large datasets. Tested on 207 ENCODE ChIP-seq datasets, our method identifies correct motifs in 78% of the datasets with known motifs, demonstrating improvement in both accuracy and efficiency compared with DREME, another state-of-art discriminative motif discovery tool. More interestingly, on the remaining more challenging datasets, we identify common technical or biological factors that compromise the motif search results and use advanced features of our tool to control for these factors. We also present case studies demonstrating the ability of our method to detect single base pair differences in DNA specificity of two similar TFs. Lastly, we demonstrate discovery of key TF motifs involved in tissue specification by examination of high-throughput DNase accessibility data. AVAILABILITY: The motifRG package is publically available via the bioconductor repository. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Zizhen Yao, Kyle L. MacQuarrie, Abraham P. Fong, Stephen J. Tapscott, Walter L. Ruzzo, Robert Gentleman
Bioinform.4
2003 Selective Instability: Maternal Effort and the Evolution of Gene Activation and Deactivation Rates
abstract
We previously used simulations of gene expression to demonstrate that rapid activation and deactivation rates stabilized outcomes in stochastic systems. We hypothesized that transient single allele inactivation of an autosomal gene during gametogenesis or very early embryogenesis could have a selective advantage if it permits the functional sampling of each allele and precludes committing maternal effort to an embryo with a deleterious mutation. To test this hypothesis, we simulated the evolution of gene expression activation and deactivation rates and imposed two different selective pressures on the populations: (a). late selection against individuals that cannot maintain a threshold level of gene product that occurs after the investment of maternal effort (i.e., after birth); or (b). early selection: in addition to late selection, maintenance of the gene product above a threshold level was necessary for early development prior to commitment of maternal effort. We found that the opportunity to save reproductive effort from early selection caused the evolution of higher deactivation rates and lower activation rates than in the late selection condition. Thus, we predict that in the special case where early selection can save maternal investment in non-viable offspring, gene expression activation rates and deactivation rates might be selected to permit sampling of the product from each allele.
Carlo C. Maley, Stephen J. Tapscott
Artif. Life2