Rahul Nair 0006

dblp:76/4693-6 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › multi-view stereo
stereo reconstruction
0.212015
Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo · ICCV 2015
Image and video processing › stereo vision
stereo matching
0.212015
Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
semi-global matching
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision › stereo matching
stereo confidence estimation
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision
0.212013
Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision · CVPR 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

patch match stereo · 0.4least squares model · 0.4random decision forest · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Reflection Modeling for Passive Stereo
abstract
Stereo reconstruction in presence of reality faces many challenges that still need to be addressed. This paper considers reflections, which introduce incorrect matches due to the observation violating the diffuse-world assumption underlying the majority of stereo techniques. Unlike most existing work, which employ regularization or robust data terms to suppress such errors, we derive two least squares models from first principles that generalize diffuse world stereo and explicitly take reflections into account. These models are parametrized by depth, orientation and material properties, resulting in a total of up to 5 parameters per pixel that have to be estimated. Additionally large non-local interactions between viewed and reflected surface have to be taken into account. These two properties make inference of the model appear prohibitive, but we present evidence that inference is actually possible using a variant of patch match stereo.
Rahul Nair 0006, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Daniel Kondermann, Carsten Rother
ICCV1
2014 Stereo Ground Truth with Error Bars
Daniel Kondermann, Rahul Nair 0006, Stephan Meister, Wolfgang Mischler, Burkhard Güssefeld, Katrin Honauer, Sabine Hofmann, Claus Brenner, Bernd Jähne
ACCV (5)2
2014 Time of flight motion compensation revisited
abstract
In this paper, we study motion artifacts that arise in Time-ofFlight imaging of dynamic scenes caused by the sequential nature of the raw image acquisition process used to compute the final depth image. Many methods for compensation of such errors have been proposed to date, but still lack a proper comparison. We bridge this gap by not only evaluating those methods, but also by providing implementations for all of them as a base-line to the community. By exchanging the calibration model necessary for these methods with a model closer to reality we were able to improve the results on all related methods without any loss of performance.
Jens-Malte Gottfried, Rahul Nair 0006, Stephan Meister, Christoph S. Garbe, Daniel Kondermann
ICIP2
2013 Ensemble Learning for Confidence Measures in Stereo Vision
abstract
With the aim to improve accuracy of stereo confidence measures, we apply the random decision forest framework to a large set of diverse stereo confidence measures. Learning and testing sets were drawn from the recently introduced KITTI dataset, which currently poses higher challenges to stereo solvers than other benchmarks with ground truth for stereo evaluation. We experiment with semi global matching stereo (SGM) and a census data term, which is the best performing real-time capable stereo method known to date. On KITTI images, SGM still produces a significant amount of error. We obtain consistently improved area under curve values of sparsification measures in comparison to best performing single stereo confidence measures where numbers of stereo errors are large. More specifically, our method performs best in all but one out of 194 frames of the KITTI dataset.
Ralf Haeusler, Rahul Nair 0006, Daniel Kondermann
CVPR2