Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jing Lu 0014

dblp:77/1751-14 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1076-7662ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Vision and language · 45% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 45% Question answering and dialogue systems · 10%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
ranking
1.322023
RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023
Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
1.222023
Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples · ICLR 2023
Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers · EMNLP 2022
Information retrieval
retrieval models
1.222023
Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023
Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain-invariant representation learning
0.712023
Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
prompt learning
0.712023
Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples · ICLR 2023
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.712023
RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
neural ranking model
0.712023
RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › ranking
text ranking
0.712023
RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › ranking › transfer ranking
zero-shot ranking
0.712023
RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
bi-encoder retrieval
0.612022
Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers · EMNLP 2022
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
neural passage retrieval
0.512021
Multi-stage Training with Improved Negative Contrast for Neural Passage Retrieval · EMNLP (1) 2021
Information retrieval › reranking
passage reranking
0.212023
Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering
0.112021
Multi-stage Training with Improved Negative Contrast for Neural Passage Retrieval · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt generation · 1.3invariant representation learning · 1.3domain adaptation · 1.3dense retrieval · 1.3fusion · 1.0sequence-to-sequence fine-tuning · 0.7pairwise ranking loss · 0.7listwise ranking loss · 0.7transfer learning · 0.6dual encoder · 0.6synthetic data generation · 0.5negative sampling · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 HYRR: Hybrid Infused Reranking for Passage Retrieval
abstract
Existing passage retrieval systems typically adopt a two-stage retrieve-then-rerank pipeline. To obtain an effective reranking model, many prior works have focused on improving the model architectures, such as leveraging powerful pretrained large language models (LLM) and designing better objective functions. However, less attention has been paid to the issue of collecting high-quality training data. In this paper, we propose HYRR, a framework for training robust reranking models. Specifically, we propose a simple but effective approach to select training data using hybrid retrievers. Our experiments show that the rerankers trained with HYRR are robust to different first-stage retrievers. Moreover, evaluations using MS MARCO and BEIR data sets demonstrate our proposed framework effectively generalizes to both supervised and zero-shot retrieval settings.
Jing Lu 0014, Keith B. Hall, Ji Ma 0004, Jianmo Ni
LREC/COLING1
2023 Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples
Zhuyun Dai, Vincent Y. Zhao, Ji Ma 0004, Yi Luan, Jianmo Ni, Jing Lu 0014, Anton Bakalov, Kelvin Guu, Keith B. Hall, Ming-Wei Chang
ICLR6
2023 Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking
abstract
Domain adaptation aims to transfer the knowledge learned on (data-rich) source domains to (low-resource) target domains, and a popular method is invariant representation learning, which matches and aligns the data distributions on the feature space. Although this method is studied extensively and applied on classification and regression problems, its adoption on ranking problems is sporadic, and the few existing implementations lack theoretical justifications. This paper revisits invariant representation learning for ranking. Upon reviewing prior work, we found that they implement what we call item-level alignment, which aligns the distributions of the items being ranked from all lists in aggregate but ignores their list structure. However, the list structure should be leveraged, because it is intrinsic to ranking problems where the data and the metrics are defined and computed on lists, not the items by themselves. To close this discrepancy, we propose list-level alignment—learning domain-invariant representations at the higher level of lists. The benefits are twofold: it leads to the first domain adaptation generalization bound for ranking, in turn providing theoretical support for the proposed method, and it achieves better empirical transfer performance for unsupervised domain adaptation on ranking tasks, including passage reranking.
Ruicheng Xian, Honglei Zhuang, Zhen Qin 0001, Hamed Zamani, Jing Lu 0014, Ji Ma 0004, Kai Hui 0001, Han Zhao 0002, Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky
NeurIPS5
2023 RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses
abstract
Pretrained language models such as BERT have been shown to be exceptionally effective for text ranking. However, there are limited studies on how to leverage more powerful sequence-to-sequence models such as T5. Existing attempts usually formulate text ranking as a classification problem and rely on postprocessing to obtain a ranked list. In this paper, we propose RankT5 and study two T5-based ranking model structures, an encoder-decoder and an encoder-only one, so that they not only can directly output ranking scores for each query-document pair, but also can be fine-tuned with pairwise or listwise ranking losses to optimize ranking performance. Our experiments show that the proposed models with ranking losses can achieve substantial ranking performance gains on different public text ranking data sets. Moreover, ranking models fine-tuned with listwise ranking losses have better zero-shot ranking performance on out-of-domain data than models fine-tuned with classification losses.
Honglei Zhuang, Zhen Qin 0001, Rolf Jagerman, Kai Hui 0001, Ji Ma 0004, Jing Lu 0014, Jianmo Ni, Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky
SIGIR6
2022 Out-of-Domain Semantics to the Rescue! Zero-Shot Hybrid Retrieval Models
Tao Chen 0008, Mingyang Zhang 0001, Jing Lu 0014, Michael Bendersky, Marc Najork
ECIR (1)3
2022 Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers
abstract
Jianmo Ni, Chen Qu, Jing Lu, Zhuyun Dai, Gustavo Hernandez Abrego, Ji Ma, Vincent Zhao, Yi Luan, Keith Hall, Ming-Wei Chang, Yinfei Yang. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Jianmo Ni, Chen Qu 0001, Jing Lu 0014, Zhuyun Dai, Gustavo Hernández Ábrego, Ji Ma 0004, Vincent Y. Zhao, Yi Luan, Keith B. Hall, Ming-Wei Chang, Yinfei Yang
EMNLP3
2021 Multi-stage Training with Improved Negative Contrast for Neural Passage Retrieval
abstract
In the context of neural passage retrieval, we study three promising techniques: synthetic data generation, negative sampling, and fusion. We systematically investigate how these techniques contribute to the performance of the retrieval system and how they complement each other. We propose a multi-stage framework comprising of pre-training with synthetic data, fine-tuning with labeled data, and negative sampling at both stages. We study six negative sampling strategies and apply them to the fine-tuning stage and, as a noteworthy novelty, to the synthetic data that we use for pre-training. Also, we explore fusion methods that combine negatives from different strategies. We evaluate our system using two passage retrieval tasks for open-domain QA and using MS MARCO. Our experiments show that augmenting the negative contrast in both stages is effective to improve passage retrieval accuracy and, importantly, they also show that synthetic data generation and negative sampling have additive benefits. Moreover, using the fusion of different kinds allows us to reach performance that establishes a new state-of-the-art level in two of the tasks we evaluated.
Jing Lu 0014, Gustavo Hernández Ábrego, Ji Ma 0004, Jianmo Ni, Yinfei Yang
EMNLP (1)1