Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jing Lu 0014
dblp:77/1751-14
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1076-7662ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Vision and language · 45% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 45% Question answering and dialogue systems · 10% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
ranking |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023 Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples · ICLR 2023 Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023 Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain-invariant representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
prompt learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples · ICLR 2023 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
neural ranking model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › ranking
text ranking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › ranking › transfer ranking
zero-shot ranking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
bi-encoder retrieval |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
neural passage retrieval |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-stage Training with Improved Negative Contrast for Neural Passage Retrieval · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Information retrieval › reranking
passage reranking |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Multi-stage Training with Improved Negative Contrast for Neural Passage Retrieval · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt generation · 1.3invariant representation learning · 1.3domain adaptation · 1.3dense retrieval · 1.3fusion · 1.0sequence-to-sequence fine-tuning · 0.7pairwise ranking loss · 0.7listwise ranking loss · 0.7transfer learning · 0.6dual encoder · 0.6synthetic data generation · 0.5negative sampling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | HYRR: Hybrid Infused Reranking for Passage RetrievalabstractExisting passage retrieval systems typically adopt a two-stage retrieve-then-rerank pipeline. To obtain an effective reranking model, many prior works have focused on improving the model architectures, such as leveraging powerful pretrained large language models (LLM) and designing better objective functions. However, less attention has been paid to the issue of collecting high-quality training data. In this paper, we propose HYRR, a framework for training robust reranking models. Specifically, we propose a simple but effective approach to select training data using hybrid retrievers. Our experiments show that the rerankers trained with HYRR are robust to different first-stage retrievers. Moreover, evaluations using MS MARCO and BEIR data sets demonstrate our proposed framework effectively generalizes to both supervised and zero-shot retrieval settings. Jing Lu 0014, Keith B. Hall, Ji Ma 0004, Jianmo Ni |
LREC/COLING | 1 |
| 2023 | Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples
Zhuyun Dai, Vincent Y. Zhao, Ji Ma 0004, Yi Luan, Jianmo Ni, Jing Lu 0014, Anton Bakalov, Kelvin Guu, Keith B. Hall, Ming-Wei Chang |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2023 | Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for RankingabstractDomain adaptation aims to transfer the knowledge learned on (data-rich) source domains to (low-resource) target domains, and a popular method is invariant representation learning, which matches and aligns the data distributions on the feature space. Although this method is studied extensively and applied on classification and regression problems, its adoption on ranking problems is sporadic, and the few existing implementations lack theoretical justifications. This paper revisits invariant representation learning for ranking. Upon reviewing prior work, we found that they implement what we call item-level alignment, which aligns the distributions of the items being ranked from all lists in aggregate but ignores their list structure. However, the list structure should be leveraged, because it is intrinsic to ranking problems where the data and the metrics are defined and computed on lists, not the items by themselves. To close this discrepancy, we propose list-level alignment—learning domain-invariant representations at the higher level of lists. The benefits are twofold: it leads to the first domain adaptation generalization bound for ranking, in turn providing theoretical support for the proposed method, and it achieves better empirical transfer performance for unsupervised domain adaptation on ranking tasks, including passage reranking. Ruicheng Xian, Honglei Zhuang, Zhen Qin 0001, Hamed Zamani, Jing Lu 0014, Ji Ma 0004, Kai Hui 0001, Han Zhao 0002, Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking LossesabstractPretrained language models such as BERT have been shown to be exceptionally effective for text ranking. However, there are limited studies on how to leverage more powerful sequence-to-sequence models such as T5. Existing attempts usually formulate text ranking as a classification problem and rely on postprocessing to obtain a ranked list. In this paper, we propose RankT5 and study two T5-based ranking model structures, an encoder-decoder and an encoder-only one, so that they not only can directly output ranking scores for each query-document pair, but also can be fine-tuned with pairwise or listwise ranking losses to optimize ranking performance. Our experiments show that the proposed models with ranking losses can achieve substantial ranking performance gains on different public text ranking data sets. Moreover, ranking models fine-tuned with listwise ranking losses have better zero-shot ranking performance on out-of-domain data than models fine-tuned with classification losses. Honglei Zhuang, Zhen Qin 0001, Rolf Jagerman, Kai Hui 0001, Ji Ma 0004, Jing Lu 0014, Jianmo Ni, Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky |
SIGIR | 6 |
| 2022 | Out-of-Domain Semantics to the Rescue! Zero-Shot Hybrid Retrieval Models
Tao Chen 0008, Mingyang Zhang 0001, Jing Lu 0014, Michael Bendersky, Marc Najork |
ECIR (1) | 3 |
| 2022 | Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable RetrieversabstractJianmo Ni, Chen Qu, Jing Lu, Zhuyun Dai, Gustavo Hernandez Abrego, Ji Ma, Vincent Zhao, Yi Luan, Keith Hall, Ming-Wei Chang, Yinfei Yang. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022. Jianmo Ni, Chen Qu 0001, Jing Lu 0014, Zhuyun Dai, Gustavo Hernández Ábrego, Ji Ma 0004, Vincent Y. Zhao, Yi Luan, Keith B. Hall, Ming-Wei Chang, Yinfei Yang |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2021 | Multi-stage Training with Improved Negative Contrast for Neural Passage RetrievalabstractIn the context of neural passage retrieval, we study three promising techniques: synthetic data generation, negative sampling, and fusion. We systematically investigate how these techniques contribute to the performance of the retrieval system and how they complement each other. We propose a multi-stage framework comprising of pre-training with synthetic data, fine-tuning with labeled data, and negative sampling at both stages. We study six negative sampling strategies and apply them to the fine-tuning stage and, as a noteworthy novelty, to the synthetic data that we use for pre-training. Also, we explore fusion methods that combine negatives from different strategies. We evaluate our system using two passage retrieval tasks for open-domain QA and using MS MARCO. Our experiments show that augmenting the negative contrast in both stages is effective to improve passage retrieval accuracy and, importantly, they also show that synthetic data generation and negative sampling have additive benefits. Moreover, using the fusion of different kinds allows us to reach performance that establishes a new state-of-the-art level in two of the tasks we evaluated. Jing Lu 0014, Gustavo Hernández Ábrego, Ji Ma 0004, Jianmo Ni, Yinfei Yang |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |