Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have made significant progress in static perception, but their ability to understand dynamic task-oriented reasoning remains unclear. Existing benchmarks mainly focus on static spatial relationships and lack systematic assessment of dynamic reasoning capabilities. To this end, we propose SpatialLogic-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs’ understanding of spatiotemporal logic and their ability to assess task progress. The benchmark assesses two critical capabilities: first, fine-grained visual discrimination to accurately perceive subtle physical changes between state frames; second, the logical capacity to connect these changes to task goals and judge whether they indicate progress. To mitigate temporal dependency biases, we introduce a dual-task paradigm, presenting image pairs in both chronological and reversed orders while keeping task descriptions consistent. We construct a multi-scale evaluation system by varying time intervals between frames: smaller intervals test the model's fine-grained perception, while larger intervals demand more sophisticated logical inference. Empirical evaluation reveals that most VLMs experience significant performance degradation on tasks presented in inverse chronological order, indicating an over-reliance on temporal cues rather than robust reasoning abilities. SpatialLogic-Bench clearly exposes critical limitations in current models and provides valuable guidance for improving dynamic spatial perception capabilities.