Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ting Hu 0002

dblp:77/3335-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3770-6309ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Learning theory · 57% Optimization for machine learning · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
information-theoretic learning
0.622020
Distributed Minimum Error Entropy Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Learning theory approach to minimum error entropy criterion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function
minimum error entropy
0.622020
Distributed Minimum Error Entropy Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Learning theory approach to minimum error entropy criterion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
early stopping
0.612022
Early Stopping for Iterative Regularization with General Loss Functions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › regularization theory
iterative regularization
0.612022
Early Stopping for Iterative Regularization with General Loss Functions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
Generalization Performance of Multi-pass Stochastic Gradient Descent with Convex Loss Functions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate schedule
0.512021
Generalization Performance of Multi-pass Stochastic Gradient Descent with Convex Loss Functions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.512021
Generalization Performance of Multi-pass Stochastic Gradient Descent with Convex Loss Functions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.322013
Learning theory approach to minimum error entropy criterion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Online Learning with Samples Drawn from Non-identical Distributions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.212022
Early Stopping for Iterative Regularization with General Loss Functions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.112020
Distributed Minimum Error Entropy Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.112009
Online Learning with Samples Drawn from Non-identical Distributions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.112009
Online Learning with Samples Drawn from Non-identical Distributions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tikhonov regularization · 0.6reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.6cross-validation · 0.6martingale analysis · 0.5concentration inequalities · 0.5u-statistics · 0.4error decomposition · 0.4divide-and-conquer · 0.4minimum error entropy criterion · 0.2online learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Convergence of Adaptive Stochastic Mirror Descent
abstract
In this article, we present a family of adaptive stochastic optimization methods, which are associated with mirror maps that are widely used to capture the geometry properties of optimization problems during iteration processes. The well-known adaptive moment estimation (Adam)-type algorithm falls into the family when the mirror maps take the form of temporal adaptation. In the context of convex objective functions, we show that with proper step sizes and hyperparameters, the average regret can achieve the convergence rate ${\mathcal { O}}(T^{-(1/2)})$ after T iterations under some standard assumptions. We further improve it to $O(T^{-1}\log T)$ when the objective functions are strongly convex. In the context of smooth objective functions (not necessarily convex), based on properties of the strongly convex differentiable mirror map, our algorithms achieve convergence rates of order ${\mathcal { O}}(T^{-(1/2)})$ up to a logarithmic term, requiring large or increasing hyperparameters that are coincident with practical usage of Adam-type algorithms. Thus, our work gives explanations for the selection of the hyperparameters in Adam-type algorithms' implementation.
Ting Hu 0002, Kai Ji, Yunwen Lei
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst.1
2023 Pairwise learning problems with regularization networks and Nyström subsampling approach
Ting Hu 0002, Siyang Jiang
Neural Networks2
2022 Early Stopping for Iterative Regularization with General Loss Functions
abstract
In this paper, we investigate the early stopping strategy for the iterative regularization technique, which is based on gradient descent of convex loss functions in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces without an explicit regularization term. This work shows that projecting the last iterate of the stopping time produces an estimator that can improve the generalization ability. Using the upper bound of the generalization errors, we establish a close link between the iterative regularization and Tikhonov regularization scheme and explain theoretically why the two schemes have similar regularization paths in the existing numerical simulations. We introduce a data-dependent way based on cross-validation to select the stopping time. We prove that the a-posteriori selection way can retain the comparable generalization errors to those obtained by our stopping rules with a-prior parameters.
Ting Hu 0002, Yunwen Lei
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2021 Generalization Performance of Multi-pass Stochastic Gradient Descent with Convex Loss Functions
abstract
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) has become the method of choice to tackle large-scale datasets due to its low computational cost and good practical performance. Learning rate analysis, either capacity-independent or capacity-dependent, provides a unifying viewpoint to study the computational and statistical properties of SGD, as well as the implicit regularization by tuning the number of passes. Existing capacity-independent learning rates require a nontrivial bounded subgradient assumption and a smoothness assumption to be optimal. Furthermore, existing capacity-dependent learning rates are only established for the specific least squares loss with a special structure. In this paper, we provide both optimal capacity-independent and capacity-dependent learning rates for SGD with general convex loss functions. Our results require neither bounded subgradient assumptions nor smoothness assumptions, and are stated with high probability. We achieve this improvement by a refined estimate on the norm of SGD iterates based on a careful martingale analysis and concentration inequalities on empirical processes.
Yunwen Lei, Ting Hu 0002, Ke Tang 0001
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2020 Distributed Minimum Error Entropy Algorithms
abstract
Minimum Error Entropy (MEE) principle is an important approach in Information Theoretical Learning (ITL). It is widely applied and studied in various fields for its robustness to noise. In this paper, we study a reproducing kernel-based distributed MEE algorithm, DMEE, which is designed to work with both fully supervised data and semi-supervised data. The divide-and-conquer approach is employed, so there is no inter-node communication overhead. Similar as other distributed algorithms, DMEE significantly reduces the computational complexity and memory requirement on single computing nodes. With fully supervised data, our proved learning rates equal the minimax optimal learning rates of the classical pointwise kernel-based regressions. Under the semi-supervised learning scenarios, we show that DMEE exploits unlabeled data effectively, in the sense that first, under the settings with weak regularity assumptions, additional unlabeled data significantly improves the learning rates of DMEE. Second, with sufficient unlabeled data, labeled data can be distributed to many more computing nodes, that each node takes only O(1) labels, without spoiling the learning rates in terms of the number of labels. This conclusion overcomes the saturation phenomenon in unlabeled data size. It parallels a recent results for regularized least squares (Lin and Zhou, 2018), and suggests that an inflation of unlabeled data is a solution to the MEE learning problems with decentralized data source for the concerns of privacy protection. Our work refers to pairwise learning and non-convex loss. The theoretical analysis is achieved by distributed U-statistics and error decomposition techniques in integral operators.
Xin Guo 0003, Ting Hu 0002, Qiang Wu 0003
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2020 Stochastic Gradient Descent for Nonconvex Learning Without Bounded Gradient Assumptions
abstract
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is a popular and efficient method with wide applications in training deep neural nets and other nonconvex models. While the behavior of SGD is well understood in the convex learning setting, the existing theoretical results for SGD applied to nonconvex objective functions are far from mature. For example, existing results require to impose a nontrivial assumption on the uniform boundedness of gradients for all iterates encountered in the learning process, which is hard to verify in practical implementations. In this article, we establish a rigorous theoretical foundation for SGD in nonconvex learning by showing that this boundedness assumption can be removed without affecting convergence rates, and relaxing the standard smoothness assumption to Hölder continuity of gradients. In particular, we establish sufficient conditions for almost sure convergence as well as optimal convergence rates for SGD applied to both general nonconvex and gradient-dominated objective functions. A linear convergence is further derived in the case with zero variances.
Yunwen Lei, Ting Hu 0002, Guiying Li 0002, Ke Tang 0001
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst.2
2019 Distributed pairwise algorithms with gradient descent methods
Baobin Wang, Ting Hu 0002
Neurocomputing2
2013 Learning theory approach to minimum error entropy criterion
Ting Hu 0002, Qiang Wu 0003, Ding-Xuan Zhou
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2009 Online Learning with Samples Drawn from Non-identical Distributions
Ting Hu 0002, Ding-Xuan Zhou
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1