Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emir Mulabegovic

dblp:77/4732 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Transport protocols and congestion control · 67% Content delivery and video streaming · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transport protocols and congestion control › reliable transport
partially reliable transport
0.012002
Lightweight Streaming Protocol (LSP) · ACM Multimedia 2002
Transport protocols and congestion control
reliable transport
0.012002
Lightweight Streaming Protocol (LSP) · ACM Multimedia 2002
Content delivery and video streaming
streaming protocol
0.012002
Lightweight Streaming Protocol (LSP) · ACM Multimedia 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

selective frame dropping · 0.0retransmission · 0.0probabilistic redundant NAK · 0.0flow control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Lightweight Streaming Protocol (LSP)
abstract
A new streaming protocol is proposed for multimedia applications. The proposed protocol, referred to as Lightweight Streaming Protocol (LSP), is an application layer protocol that sits atop UDP. The protocol is intended to improve the quality and reliability of media stream by borrowing features from reliable protocols such as retransmission and flow control while not sacrificing performance. The protocol offers semi-reliable transport. Instead of trying to guarantee 100% data delivery the protocol simply recovers as many packets as possible within a specified deadline. In addition the protocol incorporates features such as probabilistic redundant NAK transmission and flow control through selective frame dropping. Preliminary simulations show that LSP performs extremely well in channels with random packet loss such as congested networks. The protocol also performs reasonably well in channels that have short bursts of lost packets such as wireless networks.
Emir Mulabegovic, Dan Schonfeld, Rashid Ansari
ACM Multimedia1