VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oren Gal
dblp:77/7734
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2027
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 28% Motion planning and robot control · 22% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Edge and fog computing · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Learning to Explore Indoor Environments using Autonomous Micro Aerial Vehicles · ICRA 2024 Integrating Deep Reinforcement and Supervised Learning to Expedite Indoor Mapping · ICRA 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
autonomous exploration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Explore Indoor Environments using Autonomous Micro Aerial Vehicles · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Integrating Deep Reinforcement and Supervised Learning to Expedite Indoor Mapping · ICRA 2022 Efficient and safe on-line motion planning in dynamic environments · ICRA 2009 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning on Home Drone: Searching for the Optimal Architecture · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning on Home Drone: Searching for the Optimal Architecture · ICRA 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation › efficient semantic segmentation
real-time semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning on Home Drone: Searching for the Optimal Architecture · ICRA 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning on Home Drone: Searching for the Optimal Architecture · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › environment mapping
indoor mapping |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Integrating Deep Reinforcement and Supervised Learning to Expedite Indoor Mapping · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
learning-based motion planning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Integrating Deep Reinforcement and Supervised Learning to Expedite Indoor Mapping · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Explore Indoor Environments using Autonomous Micro Aerial Vehicles · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
micro aerial vehicle |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Explore Indoor Environments using Autonomous Micro Aerial Vehicles · ICRA 2024 |
Edge and fog computing
edge inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning on Home Drone: Searching for the Optimal Architecture · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
map prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Integrating Deep Reinforcement and Supervised Learning to Expedite Indoor Mapping · ICRA 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision avoidance |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient and safe on-line motion planning in dynamic environments · ICRA 2009 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
dynamic path planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient and safe on-line motion planning in dynamic environments · ICRA 2009 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
online motion planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient and safe on-line motion planning in dynamic environments · ICRA 2009 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › collision avoidance
velocity obstacle |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient and safe on-line motion planning in dynamic environments · ICRA 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep reinforcement learning · 1.3model compression · 1.3architecture search · 1.3occupancy prediction · 0.8deep learning · 0.8supervised learning · 0.6generative neural network · 0.6velocity obstacle · 0.1time-to-go optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | Unmasking deepfakes: Leveraging augmentations and features variability for deepfake speech detectionabstractDeepfake speech detection presents a growing challenge as generative audio technologies continue to advance. We propose a hybrid training framework that advances detection performance through novel augmentation strategies. First, we introduce a dual-stage masking approach that operates both at the spectrogram level (MaskedSpec) and within the latent feature space (MaskedFeature), providing complementary regularization that improves tolerance to localized distortions and enhances generalization learning. Second, we introduce compression-aware strategy during self-supervised to increase variability in low-resource scenarios while preserving the integrity of learned representations, thereby improving the suitability of pretrained features for deepfake detection. The framework integrates a learnable self-supervised feature extractor with a ResNet classification head in a unified training pipeline, enabling joint adaptation of acoustic representations and discriminative patterns. On the ASVspoof5 Challenge (Track~1), the system achieves state-of-the-art results with an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 4.08% under closed conditions, further reduced to 2.71% through fusion of models with diverse pretrained feature extractors. when trained on ASVspoof2019, our system obtaining leading performance on the ASVspoof2019 evaluation set (0.18% EER) and the ASVspoof2021 DF task (2.92% EER). Inbal Rimon, Oren Gal, Haim H. Permuter |
Comput. Speech Lang. | 2 |
| 2025 | Robust prosody modeling for synthetic speech detection
Ariel Cohen 0004, Denis Shyrman, Aleksandr Solonskyi, Roman Frenkel, Arkady Krishtul, Oren Gal |
Speech Commun. | 6 |
| 2024 | Learning to Explore Indoor Environments using Autonomous Micro Aerial VehiclesabstractIn this paper, we address the challenge of exploring unknown indoor environments using autonomous aerial robots with Size Weight and Power (SWaP) constraints. The SWaP constraints induce limits on mission time requiring efficiency in exploration. We present a novel exploration framework that uses Deep Learning (DL) to predict the most likely indoor map given the previous observations, and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for exploration, designed to run on modern SWaP constraints neural processors. The DL-based map predictor provides a prediction of the occupancy of the unseen environment while the DRL-based planner determines the best navigation goals that can be safely reached to provide the most information. The two modules are tightly coupled and run onboard allowing the vehicle to safely map an unknown environment. Extensive experimental and simulation results show that our approach surpasses state-of-the-art methods by 50-60% in efficiency, which we measure by the fraction of the explored space as a function of the trajectory length. Yuezhan Tao, Eran Iceland, Beiming Li, Elchanan Zwecher, Uri Heinemann, Avraham Cohen, Amir Avni, Oren Gal, Ariel Barel, Vijay Kumar 0001 |
ICRA | 8 |
| 2023 | Deep Learning on Home Drone: Searching for the Optimal ArchitectureabstractWe suggest the first system that runs real-time semantic segmentation via deep learning on the weak microcomputer Raspberry Pi Zero v2 (whose price was $15) attached to a toy drone. In particular, since the Raspberry Pi weighs less than 16 grams, and its size is half of a credit card, we could easily attach it to the common commercial DJI Tello toy-drone ($\times 92.5\times 41$mm). The result is an autonomous drone (no laptop nor human in the loop) that can detect and classify objects in real-time from a video stream of an onboard monocular RGB camera (no GPS or LIDAR sensors). The companion videos demonstrate how this Tello drone scans the lab for people (e.g. for the use of firefighters or security forces) and for an empty parking slot outside the lab. Existing deep learning solutions are either much too slow for real-time computation on such IoT devices, or provide results of impractical quality. Our main challenge was to design a system that takes the best of all worlds among numerous combinations of networks, deep learning platforms/frameworks, compression techniques, and compression ratios. To this end, we provide an efficient searching algorithm that aims to find the optimal combination which results in the best tradeoff between the network running time and its accuracy/performance. Alaa Maalouf, Yotam Gurfinkel, Barak Diker, Oren Gal, Daniela Rus, Dan Feldman |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2022 | Integrating Deep Reinforcement and Supervised Learning to Expedite Indoor MappingabstractThe challenge of mapping indoor environments is addressed. Typical heuristic algorithms for solving the motion planning problem are frontier-based methods, that are especially effective when the environment is completely unknown. However, in cases where prior statistical data on the environment's architectonic features is available, such algorithms can be far from optimal. Furthermore, their calculation time may increase substantially as more areas are exposed. In this paper we propose two means by which to overcome these shortcomings. One is the use of deep reinforcement learning to train the motion planner. The second is the inclusion of a pre-trained generative deep neural network, acting as a map predictor. Each one helps to improve the decision making through use of the learned structural statistics of the environment, and both, being realized as neural networks, ensure a constant calculation time. We show that combining the two methods can shorten the duration of the mapping process by up to 4 times, compared to frontier-based motion planning. Elchanan Zwecher, Eran Iceland, Sean R. Levy, Shmuel Y. Hayoun, Oren Gal, Ariel Barel |
ICRA | 5 |
| 2013 | Dynamic Objects Effect on Visibility Analysis in 3D Urban Environments
Oren Gal, Yerach Doytsher |
W2GIS | 1 |
| 2011 | Adaptive time horizon for on-line avoidance in dynamic environmentsabstractThis paper addresses the issue of motion planning in dynamic environments using Velocity Obstacles. Specifically, we propose an adaptive time horizon to truncate the velocity obstacle so that its boundary closely, yet conservatively, approximates the boundary of the set of states from which collision is unavoidable. We wish to develop a representation such that any velocity vector that does not penetrate the velocity obstacle is safe, i.e. an avoidance maneuver exists, and any that does is not. Such clear partitioning between safe and unsafe velocities would allow safe planning with only one step look ahead, and can produce faster trajectories than the conservative trajectories produced when using an infinite time horizon. The computation of the adaptive time horizon is formulated as a minimum time problem, which is solved numerically for each static or moving obstacle. It is used in an on-line planner that generates locally time optimal trajectories to the goal. The planner is demonstrated for static and moving obstacles, and for on-line motion planning in a crowded dynamic environment. Zvi Shiller, Oren Gal, Ariel Raz |
IROS | 2 |
| 2009 | Efficient and safe on-line motion planning in dynamic environmentsabstractThis paper presents a new on-line planner for dynamic environments that is based on the concept of velocity obstacles (VO). It addresses the issue of motion safety, i.e. avoiding states of inevitable collision, by selecting a proper time horizon for the velocity obstacle. The proper choice of the time horizon ensures that the boundary of the velocity obstacle coincides with the boundary of the set of inevitable collision states. This time horizon is determined by the minimum time it would take the robot to avoid collision, either by stopping or by passing the respective obstacle. The planner generates a near-time optimal trajectory to the goal by selecting at each time step the velocity that minimizes the time-to-go and is out of the velocity obstacle. The planner takes into account the shape, velocity, and path curvature of the obstacle's trajectory. It is demonstrated for on-line motion planning in very crowded static and dynamic environments. Oren Gal, Zvi Shiller, Elon D. Rimon |
ICRA | 1 |