VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mesrob I. Ohannessian
dblp:77/7823
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6479-9769ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 39% Learning theory · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Information theory · 44% Coding theory · 38% Mathematical optimization · 13% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 77% Information retrieval · 23% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linearization Explains Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linearization Explains Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linearization Explains Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Induced Model Matching: Restricted Models Help Train Full-Featured Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Fair Learning with Private Demographic Data · ICML 2020 Learning Non-Discriminatory Predictors · COLT 2017 |
Information theory › statistical inference
distribution estimation |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | The power of absolute discounting: all-dimensional distribution estimation · NIPS 2017 Near-Optimal Smoothing of Structured Conditional Probability Matrices · NIPS 2016 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fair Learning with Private Demographic Data · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
equalized odds |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning Non-Discriminatory Predictors · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning Non-Discriminatory Predictors · COLT 2017 |
Information theory › estimation theory
minimax risk |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | The power of absolute discounting: all-dimensional distribution estimation · NIPS 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Linearization Explains Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
smoothing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Near-Optimal Smoothing of Structured Conditional Probability Matrices · NIPS 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Induced Model Matching: Restricted Models Help Train Full-Featured Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Induced Model Matching: Restricted Models Help Train Full-Featured Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Greedy-Bayes for Targeted News Dissemination · SIGMETRICS 2015 |
Coding theory › source coding › universal coding
adaptive coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | About Adaptive Coding on Countable Alphabets: Max-Stable Envelope Classes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015 |
Coding theory
source coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | About Adaptive Coding on Countable Alphabets: Max-Stable Envelope Classes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015 |
Coding theory › source coding
universal coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | About Adaptive Coding on Countable Alphabets: Max-Stable Envelope Classes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | The power of absolute discounting: all-dimensional distribution estimation · NIPS 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization › low-rank matrix factorization
nonnegative matrix factorization |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Near-Optimal Smoothing of Structured Conditional Probability Matrices · NIPS 2016 |
Information retrieval › online advertising
user targeting |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Greedy-Bayes for Targeted News Dissemination · SIGMETRICS 2015 |
Coding theory › source coding › universal coding
minimax redundancy |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | About Adaptive Coding on Countable Alphabets: Max-Stable Envelope Classes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral perturbation analysis · 0.9neural tangent kernel · 0.9LoRA · 0.9privatization · 0.9non-discriminatory learning · 0.9transformer · 0.8logistic regression · 0.8LSTM · 0.8multi-armed bandit · 0.4greedy algorithm · 0.4bayesian methods · 0.4power-law distributions · 0.3post-hoc correction · 0.3moment relaxation · 0.3good-turing estimator · 0.3sample complexity bounds · 0.2nonnegative matrix factorization · 0.2additive smoothing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Linearization Explains Fine-Tuning in Large Language ModelsabstractParameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) is a popular class of techniques that strive to adapt large models in a scalable and resource-efficient manner. Yet, the mechanisms underlying their training performance and generalization remain underexplored. In this paper, we provide several insights into such fine-tuning through the lens of linearization. Fine-tuned models are often implicitly encouraged to remain close to the pretrained model. By making this explicit, using an $\ell_2$-distance inductive bias in parameter space, we show that fine-tuning dynamics become equivalent to learning with the positive-definite neural tangent kernel (NTK). We specifically analyze how close the fully linear and the linearized fine-tuning optimizations are, based on the strength of the regularization. This allows us to be pragmatic about how good a model linearization is when fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). When linearization is a good model, our findings reveal a strong correlation between the eigenvalue spectrum of the NTK and the performance of model adaptation. Motivated by this, we give spectral perturbation bounds on the NTK induced by the choice of layers selected for fine-tuning. We empirically validate our theory on Low Rank Adaptation (LoRA) on LLMs. These insights not only characterize fine-tuning but also have the potential to enhance PEFT techniques, paving the way to better informed and more nimble adaptation in LLMs. Zahra Rahimi Afzal, Tara Esmaeilbeig, Mojtaba Soltanalian, Mesrob I. Ohannessian |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2025 | Fairness of Interaction in Ranking under Position, Selection, and Trust BiasabstractRanking algorithms in online platforms serve not only users on the demand side, but also items on the supply side. While ranking has traditionally presented items in an order that maximizes their utility to users, the uneven interactions that different items receive as a result of such a ranking can pose item fairness concerns. Moreover, interaction is affected by various forms of bias, two of which have received considerable attention: position bias and selection bias. Position bias occurs due to lower likelihood of observation for items in lower ranked positions. Selection bias occurs because interaction is not possible with items below an arbitrary cutoff position chosen by the front-end application at deployment time (i.e., showing only the top- k items). A less studied, third form of bias, trust bias, is equally important, as it makes interaction dependent on rank even after observation, by influencing the item’s perceived relevance. To capture interaction disparity in the presence of all three biases, in this article, we introduce a flexible fairness metric. Using this metric, we develop a post-processing algorithm that optimizes fairness in ranking through greedy exploration and allows a tradeoff between fairness and utility. Our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art fair ranking algorithms on several datasets. Zohreh Ovaisi, Parsa Saadatpanah, Shahin Sefati, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Elena Zheleva |
Trans. Recomm. Syst. | 4 |
| 2024 | Induced Model Matching: Restricted Models Help Train Full-Featured ModelsabstractWe consider scenarios where a very accurate (often small) predictive model using restricted features is available when training a full-featured (often larger) model. This restricted model may be thought of as ``side-information'', and can come either from an auxiliary dataset or from the same dataset by forcing the restriction. How can the restricted model be useful to the full model? To answer this, we introduce a methodology called Induced Model Matching (IMM). IMM aligns the context-restricted, or induced, version of the large model with the restricted model. We relate IMM to approaches such as noising, which is implicit in addressing the problem, and reverse knowledge distillation from weak teachers, which is explicit but does not exploit restriction being the nature of the weakness. We show that these prior methods can be thought of as approximations to IMM and can be problematic in terms of consistency. Experimentally, we first motivate IMM using logistic regression as a toy example. We then explore it in language modeling, the application that initially inspired it, and demonstrate it on both LSTM and transformer full models, using bigrams as restricted models. We lastly give a simple RL example, which shows that POMDP policies can help learn better MDP policies. The IMM principle is thus generally applicable in common scenarios where restricted data is cheaper to collect or restricted models are easier to learn. Usama Muneeb, Mesrob I. Ohannessian |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Towards Competitive N-gram SmoothingabstractN-gram models remain a fundamental component of language modeling. In data-scarce regimes, they are a strong alternative to neural models. Even when not used as-is, recent work shows they can regularize neural models. Despite this success, the effectiveness of one of the best N-gram smoothing methods, the one suggested by Kneser and Ney (1995), is not fully understood. In the hopes of explaining this performance, we study it through the lens of competitive distribution estimation: the ability to perform as well as an oracle aware of further structure in the data. We first establish basic competitive properties of Kneser-Ney smoothing. We then investigate the nature of its backoff mechanism and show that it emerges from first principles, rather than being an assumption of the model. We do this by generalizing the Good-Turing estimator to the contextual setting. This exploration leads us to a powerful generalization of Kneser-Ney, which we conjecture to have even stronger competitive properties. Empirically, it significantly improves performance on language modeling, even matching feed-forward neural models. To show that the mechanisms at play are not restricted to language modeling, we demonstrate similar gains on the task of predicting attack types in the Global Terrorism Database. Moein Falahatgar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Alon Orlitsky, Venkatadheeraj Pichapati |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2020 | Fair Learning with Private Demographic DataabstractSensitive attributes such as race are rarely available to learners in real world settings as their collection is often restricted by laws and regulations. We give a scheme that allows individuals to release their sensitive information privately while still allowing any downstream entity to learn non-discriminatory predictors. We show how to adapt non-discriminatory learners to work with privatized protected attributes giving theoretical guarantees on performance. Finally, we highlight how the methodology could apply to learning fair predictors in settings where protected attributes are only available for a subset of the data. Hussein Mozannar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Nathan Srebro |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | Learning Non-Discriminatory PredictorsabstractWe consider learning a predictor which is non-discriminatory with respect to a “protected attribute” according to the notion of “equalized odds” proposed by Hardt et al. (2016). We study the problem of learning such a non-discriminatory predictor from a finite training set, both statistically and computationally. We show that a post-hoc correction approach, as suggested by Hardt et al, can be highly suboptimal, present a nearly-optimal statistical procedure, argue that the associated computational problem is intractable, and suggest a second moment relaxation of the non-discrimination definition for which learning is tractable. Blake E. Woodworth, Suriya Gunasekar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Nathan Srebro |
COLT | 3 |
| 2017 | The power of absolute discounting: all-dimensional distribution estimationabstractCategorical models are a natural fit for many problems. When learning the distribution of categories from samples, high-dimensionality may dilute the data. Minimax optimality is too pessimistic to remedy this issue. A serendipitously discovered estimator, absolute discounting, corrects empirical frequencies by subtracting a constant from observed categories, which it then redistributes among the unobserved. It outperforms classical estimators empirically, and has been used extensively in natural language modeling. In this paper, we rigorously explain the prowess of this estimator using less pessimistic notions. We show that (1) absolute discounting recovers classical minimax KL-risk rates, (2) it is \emph{adaptive} to an effective dimension rather than the true dimension, (3) it is strongly related to the Good-Turing estimator and inherits its \emph{competitive} properties. We use power-law distributions as the cornerstone of these results. We validate the theory via synthetic data and an application to the Global Terrorism Database. Moein Falahatgar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Alon Orlitsky, Venkatadheeraj Pichapati |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2016 | Near-Optimal Smoothing of Structured Conditional Probability MatricesabstractUtilizing the structure of a probabilistic model can significantly increase its learning speed. Motivated by several recent applications, in particular bigram models in language processing, we consider learning low-rank conditional probability matrices under expected KL-risk. This choice makes smoothing, that is the careful handling of low-probability elements, paramount. We derive an iterative algorithm that extends classical non-negative matrix factorization to naturally incorporate additive smoothing and prove that it converges to the stationary points of a penalized empirical risk. We then derive sample-complexity bounds for the global minimizer of the penalized risk and show that it is within a small factor of the optimal sample complexity. This framework generalizes to more sophisticated smoothing techniques, including absolute-discounting. Moein Falahatgar, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Alon Orlitsky |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2015 | Tradeoffs for Space, Time, Data and Risk in Unsupervised LearningabstractFaced with massive data, is it possible to trade off (statistical) risk, and (computational) space and time? This challenge lies at the heart of large-scale machine learning. Using k-means clustering as a prototypical unsupervised learning problem, we show how we can strategically summarize the data (control space) in order to trade off risk and time when data is generated by a probabilistic model. Our summarization is based on coreset constructions from computational geometry. We also develop an algorithm, TRAM, to navigate the space/time/data/risk tradeoff in practice. In particular, we show that for a fixed risk (or data size), as the data size increases (resp. risk increases) the running time of TRAM decreases. Our extensive experiments on real data sets demonstrate the existence and practical utility of such tradeoffs, not only for k-means but also for Gaussian Mixture Models. Mario Lucic, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Amin Karbasi, Andreas Krause 0001 |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2015 | Greedy-Bayes for Targeted News DisseminationabstractThis work addresses user targeting for news content delivery. Specifically, we wish to disseminate a fresh news content, whose topic is yet unknown, to all interested users, while "spamming" a minimum number of uninterested users. We formulate this as an online stochastic optimization problem that extends in several ways the classical multi-armed bandit problem. Laurent Massoulié, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Alexandre Proutière |
SIGMETRICS | 2 |
| 2015 | About Adaptive Coding on Countable Alphabets: Max-Stable Envelope ClassesabstractIn this paper, we study the problem of lossless universal source coding for stationary memoryless sources on countably infinite alphabets. This task is generally not achievable without restricting the class of sources over which universality is desired. Building on our prior work, we propose natural families of sources characterized by a common dominating envelope. We particularly emphasize the notion of adaptivity, which is the ability to perform as well as an oracle knowing the envelope, without actually knowing it. This is closely related to the notion of hierarchical universal source coding, but with the important difference that families of envelope classes are not discretely indexed and not necessarily nested. Our contribution is to extend the classes of envelopes over which adaptive universal source coding is possible, namely by including max-stable (heavy-tailed) envelopes which are excellent models in many applications, such as natural language modeling. We derive a minimax lower bound on the redundancy of any code on such envelope classes, including an oracle that knows the envelope. We then propose a constructive code that does not use knowledge of the envelope. The code is computationally efficient and is structured to use an expanding threshold for auto-censoring (ETAC), and we therefore dub it the ETAC-code. We prove that the ETAC-code achieves the lower bound on the minimax redundancy within a factor logarithmic in the sequence length, and can be therefore qualified as a near-adaptive code over families of heavy-tailed envelopes. For finite and light-tailed envelopes, the penalty is even less, and the same code follows closely previous results that explicitly made the light-tailed assumption. Our technical results are founded on methods from regular variation theory and concentration of measure. Stéphane Boucheron, Elisabeth Gassiat, Mesrob I. Ohannessian |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |
| 2011 | Optimal Caching Router Placement for Reduction in Retransmission DelayabstractWe analyze the use of caching of video frames at network routers for reducing average retransmission delay. We formulate an expression for the average retransmission delay using video caching routers. In turn, we use this expression to formulate a mathematical program to minimize the average retransmission delay. We find a dynamic programming solution to the resultant non-linear convex binary integer program. We compare the results obtained from the dynamic programming solution with those obtained via experimental exhaustive enumeration. The experimental results validate our models and dynamic programming solution. Finally, we use numerical analysis to quantify the retransmission delay difference between the best and worst caching router placements. Our findings show that the optimal placement of caching routers can significantly reduce cost by minimizing the number of caching routers required to meet a desired retransmission delay performance. Furthermore, our dynamic programming solution shows that such optimal placement can be efficiently determined from network parameters, without an exhaustive search. Michael P. McGarry, Rosish Shakya, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Rony Ferzli |
ICCCN | 3 |
| 2008 | A turbo-style algorithm for lexical baseforms estimationabstractIn this research, an iterative and unsupervised Turbo-style algorithm is presented and implemented for the task of automatic lexical acquisition. The algorithm makes use of spoken examples of both spellings and words and fuses information from letter and subword recognizers to boost the overall lexical learning performance. The algorithm is tested on a challenging lexicon of restaurant and street names and evaluated in terms of spelling accuracy and letter error rate. Absolute improvements of 7.2% and 3% (15.5% relative improvement) are obtained in the spelling accuracy and the letter error rate respectively following only 2 iterations of the algorithm. Ghinwa F. Choueiter, Mesrob I. Ohannessian, Stephanie Seneff, James R. Glass |
ICASSP | 2 |