Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruth Schulz

dblp:77/940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 59% Vision and language · 14% Multi-agent systems · 14%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
topological mapping
0.532016
Find my office: Navigating real space from semantic descriptions · ICRA 2016
Communication between Lingodroids with different cognitive capabilities · ICRA 2013
Lingodroids: Learning terms for time · ICRA 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
robot language learning
0.322013
Communication between Lingodroids with different cognitive capabilities · ICRA 2013
Lingodroids: Learning terms for time · ICRA 2012
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding › language grounding
spatial language grounding
0.322013
Communication between Lingodroids with different cognitive capabilities · ICRA 2013
Lingodroids: Learning terms for time · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual navigation
language-guided navigation
0.212016
Find my office: Navigating real space from semantic descriptions · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › semantic mapping
place categorization
0.212016
Place categorization and semantic mapping on a mobile robot · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
semantic mapping
0.212016
Place categorization and semantic mapping on a mobile robot · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual navigation
semantic navigation
0.212016
Find my office: Navigating real space from semantic descriptions · ICRA 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › directed exploration
goal-directed exploration
0.212015
Robot navigation using human cues: A robot navigation system for symbolic goal-directed exploration · ICRA 2015
Computer vision › Vision and language › temporal grounding
temporal language grounding
0.112012
Lingodroids: Learning terms for time · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
spatial cognition
0.112011
Lingodroids: Studies in spatial cognition and language · ICRA 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian filtering
0.112016
Place categorization and semantic mapping on a mobile robot · ICRA 2016
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.112016
Place categorization and semantic mapping on a mobile robot · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
path planning
0.112015
Robot navigation using human cues: A robot navigation system for symbolic goal-directed exploration · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
occupancy grid mapping
0.012013
Communication between Lingodroids with different cognitive capabilities · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
spatial representation
0.012011
Lingodroids: Studies in spatial cognition and language · ICRA 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic planning · 0.2one-vs-all classifier · 0.2door label detection · 0.2convolutional network · 0.2bayesian filter · 0.2text recognition · 0.2probabilistic filter · 0.2continuous attractor network · 0.2social interaction · 0.1goal-directed behavior · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Collaborative Robots Learning Spatial Language for Picking and Placing Objects on a Table
abstract
A shared understanding of language will assist natural interactions between humans and artificial agents or robots undertaking collaborative tasks. An important domain for collaborative armed robots is interacting with humans and objects on a table, for example, picking, placing, or handing over a variety of objects. Such tasks combine object representation and movement planning in the geometric domain with abstract reasoning about symbolic spatial representations. This paper presents an initial study in which a human partner teaches the robot words for spatial relationships by providing exemplars and indicating where words may be used over the surface. This study demonstrates how robots can be taught the words required for these tasks in a quick and simple manner that allows the concepts to be generalizable over different surfaces, objects, and object placements.
Ruth Schulz
HAI1
2017 Building a Bridge with a Robot: A System for Collaborative On-table Task Execution
abstract
It is possible to build highly accurate and mobile robots able to perceive their environment. Such robots can be used to assist humans in everyday tasks to reduce their workload. As a consequence, communication and interaction between humans and robots is becoming more important. In this paper we present a system for human-robot collaboration for on-table tasks. Due to its extensible design our system serves us as a base for further investigations in human-robot collaboration. We used the system to implement five action-selection strategies for the robot:proactive, autonomous, reactive, human-requested and human-commands. We conducted a pilot study to compare the interaction modes during a task in which the human and the robot build a bridge using blocks. The results of the pilot study indicate that for the simple bridge-building task, people prefer to interact with a robot using the proactive action-selection strategy. The completion of the pilot study indicates that the system is useful for human-robot collaboration studies. Several limitations have been identified that will be addressed in future developments.
Ruth Schulz, Philipp Kratzer, Marc Toussaint
HAI1
2016 Place categorization and semantic mapping on a mobile robot
abstract
In this paper we focus on the challenging problem of place categorization and semantic mapping on a robot without environment-specific training. Motivated by their ongoing success in various visual recognition tasks, we build our system upon a state-of-the-art convolutional network. We overcome its closed-set limitations by complementing the network with a series of one-vs-all classifiers that can learn to recognize new semantic classes online. Prior domain knowledge is incorporated by embedding the classification system into a Bayesian filter framework that also ensures temporal coherence. We evaluate the classification accuracy of the system on a robot that maps a variety of places on our campus in real-time. We show how semantic information can boost robotic object detection performance and how the semantic map can be used to modulate the robot's behaviour during navigation tasks. The system is made available to the community as a ROS module.
Niko Sünderhauf, Feras Dayoub, Sean McMahon, Ben Talbot, Ruth Schulz, Peter I. Corke, Gordon F. Wyeth, Ben Upcroft, Michael Milford
ICRA5
2016 Find my office: Navigating real space from semantic descriptions
abstract
This paper shows that by using only symbolic language phrases, a mobile robot can purposefully navigate to specified rooms in previously unexplored environments. The robot intelligently organises a symbolic language description of the unseen environment and “imagines” a representative map, called the abstract map. The abstract map is an internal representation of the topological structure and spatial layout of symbolically defined locations. To perform goal-directed exploration, the abstract map creates a high-level semantic plan to reason about spaces beyond the robot's known world. While completing the plan, the robot uses the metric guidance provided by a spatial layout, and grounded observations of door labels, to efficiently guide its navigation. The system is shown to complete exploration in unexplored spaces by travelling only 13.3% further than the optimal path.
Ben Talbot, Obadiah Lam, Ruth Schulz, Feras Dayoub, Ben Upcroft, Gordon F. Wyeth
ICRA3
2015 Robot navigation using human cues: A robot navigation system for symbolic goal-directed exploration
abstract
In this paper we present for the first time a complete symbolic navigation system that performs goal-directed exploration to unfamiliar environments on a physical robot. We introduce a novel construct called the abstract map to link provided symbolic spatial information with observed symbolic information and actual places in the real world. Symbolic information is observed using a text recognition system that has been developed specifically for the application of reading door labels. In the study described in this paper, the robot was provided with a floor plan and a destination. The destination was specified by a room number, used both in the floor plan and on the door to the room. The robot autonomously navigated to the destination using its text recognition, abstract map, mapping, and path planning systems. The robot used the symbolic navigation system to determine an efficient path to the destination, and reached the goal in two different real-world environments. Simulation results show that the system reduces the time required to navigate to a goal when compared to random exploration.
Ruth Schulz, Ben Talbot, Obadiah Lam, Feras Dayoub, Peter I. Corke, Ben Upcroft, Gordon F. Wyeth
ICRA1
2013 Communication between Lingodroids with different cognitive capabilities
abstract
Previous studies have shown how Lingodroids, language learning mobile robots, learn terms for space and time, connecting their personal maps of the world to a publically shared language. One caveat of previous studies was that the robots shared the same cognitive architecture, identical in all respects from sensors to mapping systems. In this paper we investigate the question of how terms for space can be developed between robots that have fundamentally different sensors and spatial representations. In the real world, communication needs to occur between agents that have different embodiment and cognitive capabilities, including different sensors, different representations of the world, and different species (including humans). The novel aspects of these studies is that one robot uses a forward facing camera to estimate appearance and uses a biologically inspired continuous attractor network to generate a topological map; the other robot uses a laser scanner to estimate range and uses a probabilistic filter approach to generate an occupancy grid. The robots hold conversations in different locations to establish a shared language. Despite their different ways of sensing and mapping the world, the robots are able to create coherent lexicons for the space around them.
Scott Heath, David Ball, Ruth Schulz, Janet Wiles
ICRA3
2012 Lingodroids: Learning terms for time
abstract
For humans and robots to communicate using natural language it is necessary for the robots to develop concepts and associated terms that correspond to the human use of words. Time and space are foundational concepts in human language, and to develop a set of words that correspond to human notions of time and space, it is necessary to take into account the way that they are used in natural human conversations, where terms and phrases such as `soon', `in a while', or `near' are often used. We present language learning robots called Lingodroids that can learn and use simple terms for time and space. In previous work, the Lingodroids were able to learn terms for space. In this work we extend their abilities by adding temporal variables which allow them to learn terms for time. The robots build their own maps of the world and interact socially to form a shared lexicon for location and duration terms. The robots successfully use the shared lexicons to communicate places and times to meet again.
Scott Heath, Ruth Schulz, David Ball, Janet Wiles
ICRA2
2011 Lingodroids: Studies in spatial cognition and language
abstract
The Lingodroids are a pair of mobile robots that evolve a language for places and relationships between places (based on distance and direction). Each robot in these studies has its own understanding of the layout of the world, based on its unique experiences and exploration of the environment. Despite having different internal representations of the world, the robots are able to develop a common lexicon for places, and then use simple sentences to explain and understand relationships between places even places that they could not physically experience, such as areas behind closed doors. By learning the language, the robots are able to develop representations for places that are inaccessible to them, and later, when the doors are opened, use those representations to perform goal-directed behavior.
Ruth Schulz, Arren Glover, Michael Milford, Gordon F. Wyeth, Janet Wiles
ICRA1
2010 Language Change across Generations for Robots using Cognitive Maps
Ruth Schulz, Gordon F. Wyeth, Janet Wiles
ALIFE1