Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Janis Iraids

dblp:77/9496 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-3308-6029ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 48% Computational complexity · 31% Algorithms and data structures · 21%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
0.622019
Quantum Speedups for Exponential-Time Dynamic Programming Algorithms · SODA 2019
Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality · CCC 2016
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.412019
Quantum Speedups for Exponential-Time Dynamic Programming Algorithms · SODA 2019
Computational complexity
polynomial method
0.212016
Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality · CCC 2016
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum computing
0.212016
Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality · CCC 2016
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity
0.212016
Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality · CCC 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

grover's search · 0.4dynamic programming · 0.4grothendieck's inequality · 0.2degree-2 polynomial approximation · 0.2block-multilinear polynomials · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Quantum Lower and Upper Bounds for 2D-Grid and Dyck Language
abstract
We study the quantum query complexity of two problems. First, we consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is a properly balanced one (a Dyck word), with a depth of at most k. We call this the Dyck_{k,n} problem. We prove a lower bound of Ω(c^k √n), showing that the complexity of this problem increases exponentially in k. Here n is the length of the word. When k is a constant, this is interesting as a representative example of star-free languages for which a surprising Õ(√n) query quantum algorithm was recently constructed by Aaronson et al. [Scott Aaronson et al., 2018]. Their proof does not give rise to a general algorithm. When k is not a constant, Dyck_{k,n} is not context-free. We give an algorithm with O(√n(log n)^{0.5k}) quantum queries for Dyck_{k,n} for all k. This is better than the trival upper bound n for k = o({log(n)}/{log log n}). Second, we consider connectivity problems on grid graphs in 2 dimensions, if some of the edges of the grid may be missing. By embedding the "balanced parentheses" problem into the grid, we show a lower bound of Ω(n^{1.5-ε}) for the directed 2D grid and Ω(n^{2-ε}) for the undirected 2D grid. The directed problem is interesting as a black-box model for a class of classical dynamic programming strategies including the one that is usually used for the well-known edit distance problem. We also show a generalization of this result to more than 2 dimensions.
Andris Ambainis, Kaspars Balodis, Janis Iraids, Kamil Khadiev, Vladislavs Klevickis, Krisjanis Prusis, Yixin Shen 0001, Juris Smotrovs, Jevgenijs Vihrovs
MFCS3
2019 Quantum Speedups for Exponential-Time Dynamic Programming Algorithms
abstract
In this paper we study quantum algorithms for NP-complete problems whose best classical algorithm is an exponential time application of dynamic programming. We introduce the path in the hypercube problem that models many of these dynamic programming algorithms. In this problem we are asked whether there is a path from 0n to 1n in a given subgraph of the Boolean hypercube, where the edges are all directed from smaller to larger Hamming weight. We give a quantum algorithm that solves path in the hypercube in time O*(1.817n). The technique combines Grover's search with computing a partial dynamic programming table. We use this approach to solve a variety of vertex ordering problems on graphs in the same time O*(1.817n), and graph bandwidth in time O*(2.946n). Then we use similar ideas to solve the travelling salesman problem and minimum set cover in time O*(1.728n).
Andris Ambainis, Kaspars Balodis, Janis Iraids, Martins Kokainis, Krisjanis Prusis, Jevgenijs Vihrovs
SODA3
2017 Exact Quantum Query Complexity of \text EXACT_k, l^n
Andris Ambainis, Janis Iraids, Daniel Nagaj
SOFSEM2
2016 Polynomials, Quantum Query Complexity, and Grothendieck's Inequality
abstract
We show an equivalence between 1-query quantum algorithms and representations by degree-2 polynomials. Namely, a partial Boolean function f is computable by a 1-query quantum algorithm with error bounded by epsilon<1/2 iff f can be approximated by a degree-2 polynomial with error bounded by epsilon'<1/2. This result holds for two different notions of approximation by a polynomial: the standard definition of Nisan and Szegedy and the approximation by block-multilinear polynomials recently introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015]. The proof uses Grothendieck's inequality to relate two matrix norms, with one norm corresponding to polynomial approximations and the other norm corresponding to quantum algorithms. We also show two results for polynomials of higher degree. First, there is a total Boolean function which requires ~Omega(n) quantum queries but can be represented by a block-multilinear polynomial of degree ~O(sqrt(n)). Thus, in the general case (for an arbitrary number of queries), block-multilinear polynomials are not equivalent to quantum algorithms. Second, for any constant degree k, the two notions of approximation by a polynomial (the standard and the block-multilinear) are equivalent. As a consequence, we solve an open problem from [Aaronson/Ambainis, STOC 2015], showing that one can estimate the value of any bounded degree-k polynomial p:{0,1}^n -> [-1,1] with O(n^{1-1/(2k)) queries.
Scott Aaronson, Andris Ambainis, Janis Iraids, Martins Kokainis, Juris Smotrovs
CCC3
2015 Structured Frequency Algorithms
Kaspars Balodis, Janis Iraids, Rusins Freivalds
TAMC2
2012 Tree Based Domain-Specific Mapping Languages
Elina Kalnina, Audris Kalnins, Agris Sostaks, Edgars Celms, Janis Iraids
SOFSEM5