Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vikas Kapur

dblp:78/1928 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.011990
Probabilistic Language Analysis of Weighted Voting Algorithms · SIGMETRICS 1990
Distributed systems › quorum systems
weighted voting
0.011990
Probabilistic Language Analysis of Weighted Voting Algorithms · SIGMETRICS 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic language analysis · 0.0generating functions · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Probabilistic Language Analysis of Weighted Voting Algorithms
abstract
We present a method of analyzing the performance of weighted voting algorithms in a fault-tolerant distributed system. In many distributed systems, some processors send messages more frequently than others and all processors share a common communication medium, such as an Ethernet. Typical fault-tolerant voting algorithms require that a certain minimum number of votes be collected from different processors. System performance is significantly affected by the time required to collect those votes. We formulate the problem of weighted voting in terms of probabilistic languages and then use the calculus of generating functions to compute the expected delay to collect that number of votes. An application of the method to a particular voting algorithm, the Total protocol, is given.
Louise E. Moser, Vikas Kapur, P. M. Melliar-Smith
SIGMETRICS2