Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Salil Prabhakar
dblp:78/2643
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
6 papers |
Biometric security · 97% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 3% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition |
0.1 | 5 | 2002 | On the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002 On the Individuality of Fingerprints · CVPR (1) 2001 Filterbank-based fingerprint matching · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000 |
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition › fingerprint matching
minutiae matching |
0.1 | 3 | 2002 | On the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002 On the Individuality of Fingerprints · CVPR (1) 2001 Filterbank-based fingerprint matching · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000 |
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition
fingerprint individuality |
0.1 | 2 | 2002 | On the Individuality of Fingerprints · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002 On the Individuality of Fingerprints · CVPR (1) 2001 |
Biometric security
biometric authentication |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004 |
Biometric security › biometric template protection
biometric key binding |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004 |
Biometric security › biometric template protection
biometric key generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004 |
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition
fingerprint classification |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | A Multichannel Approach to Fingerprint Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1999 |
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition
fingerprint matching |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | FingerCode: A Filterbank for Fingerprint Representation and Matching · CVPR 1999 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key management |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004 |
Biometric security › fingerprint recognition
fingerprint indexing |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | A Multichannel Approach to Fingerprint Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probability estimation · 0.1minutiae representation · 0.1euclidean distance matching · 0.1fingerprint biometric · 0.0cryptographic key binding · 0.0probabilistic modeling · 0.0gabor filter · 0.0fingercode · 0.0gabor filterbank · 0.0fingercode representation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Minutiae-based template synthesis and matching for fingerprint authentication
Tamer Uz, George Bebis, Ali Erol, Salil Prabhakar |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 4 |
| 2007 | Introduction to the Special Issue on Biometrics: Progress and DirectionsabstractThe guest editors provide an overview of the articles selected for this special issue. The issue's goal is to document the current state-of-the-art, acknowledge the latest breakthroughs achieved by scientists working in the area of biometric recognition, and identify future promising research areas. It is thought the selection of papers discussed should give readers a good idea of where researchers have been focusing, both on long- studied problems still needing more work and on newer challenges. A fundamental of the field of biometrics is an ever-increasing need for better recognition and stronger security. But, as public and commercial biometric deployments increase in number, there is also more need to understand privacy issues and to provide greater ease-of-use. The volume and quality of papers in this special issue indicate that much progress has been made in many aspects of the biometrics field and that there are challenging and promising future directions still to follow. Salil Prabhakar, Josef Kittler, Davide Maltoni, Lawrence O'Gorman, Tieniu Tan |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2004 | Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and ChallengesabstractIn traditional cryptosystems, user authentication is based on possession of secret keys; the method falls apart if the keys are not kept secret (i.e., shared with non-legitimate users). Further, keys can be forgotten, lost, or stolen and, thus, cannot provide non-repudiation. Current authentication systems based on physiological and behavioral characteristics of persons (known as biometrics), such as fingerprints, inherently provide solutions to many of these problems and may replace the authentication component of traditional cryptosystems. We present various methods that monolithically bind a cryptographic key with the biometric template of a user stored in the database in such a way that the key cannot be revealed without a successful biometric authentication. We assess the performance of one of these biometric key binding/generation algorithms using the fingerprint biometric. We illustrate the challenges involved in biometric key generation primarily due to drastic acquisition variations in the representation of a biometric identifier and the imperfect nature of biometric feature extraction and matching algorithms. We elaborate on the suitability of these algorithms for digital rights management systems. Umut Uludag, Sharath Pankanti, Salil Prabhakar, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
Proc. IEEE | 3 |
| 2004 | An introduction to biometric recognitionabstractA wide variety of systems requires reliable personal recognition schemes to either confirm or determine the identity of an individual requesting their services. The purpose of such schemes is to ensure that the rendered services are accessed only by a legitimate user and no one else. Examples of such applications include secure access to buildings, computer systems, laptops, cellular phones, and ATMs. In the absence of robust personal recognition schemes, these systems are vulnerable to the wiles of an impostor. Biometric recognition, or, simply, biometrics, refers to the automatic recognition of individuals based on their physiological and/or behavioral characteristics. By using biometrics, it is possible to confirm or establish an individual's identity based on "who she is", rather than by "what she possesses" (e.g., an ID card) or "what she remembers" (e.g., a password). We give a brief overview of the field of biometrics and summarize some of its advantages, disadvantages, strengths, limitations, and related privacy concerns. Anil K. Jain 0001, Arun Ross, Salil Prabhakar |
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. | 3 |
| 2003 | Learning fingerprint minutiae location and type
Salil Prabhakar, Anil K. Jain 0001, Sharath Pankanti |
Pattern Recognit. | 1 |
| 2002 | Detection and segmentation of sweeps in color graphics imagesabstractBusiness graphics are an important class of digital imagery. Such images are computer-generated, and comprise synthetic elements such as solid fills, line art, and color sweeps. Often these images are first printed and then scanned for further electronic reuse. The printing and scanning process destroys the synthetic structure of a graphics image, and furthermore introduces distortions due to halftoning and other forms of printer and scanner noise. Subsequent reproductions usually amplify these distortions thus resulting in rapid degradation of image quality. It would thus be desirable to detect and reconstruct the original synthetic structure from the scanned image. This paper presents an effort in this direction, namely a method to detect color sweeps in scanned images. Once detected, the synthetic signature of the sweep is derived, namely its starting and ending color. This information can be used to optimize subsequent image processing operations such as rendering to an output device, or image compression. This work represents a novel application of known image processing techniques to extract semantic information from graphics images. Salil Prabhakar, Raja Bala, John C. Handley, Ying-wei Lin |
ICIP (3) | 1 |
| 2002 | Picture-graphics color image classificationabstractHigh-level (semantic) image classification can be achieved by analysis of low-level image attributes geared for the particular classes. In this paper, we have proposed a novel application of the known image processing and classification techniques to achieve such a high-level classification of color images. Our image classification algorithm uses three low-level image features: texture, color, and edge characteristics to classify a color image into two classes: business graphics or natural picture. We have achieved an accuracy of 96.6% on our database of 209 images using a combination of tree and neural network classifiers. Salil Prabhakar, John C. Handley, Zhigang Fan 0001, Ying-wei Lin |
ICIP (2) | 1 |
| 2002 | On the Individuality of FingerprintsabstractFingerprint identification is based on two basic premises: (1) persistence and (2) individuality. We address the problem of fingerprint individuality by quantifying the amount of information available in minutiae features to establish a correspondence between two fingerprint images. We derive an expression which estimates the probability of a false correspondence between minutiae-based representations from two arbitrary fingerprints belonging to different fingers. Our results show that (1) contrary to the popular belief, fingerprint matching is not infallible and leads to some false associations, (2) while there is an overwhelming amount of discriminatory information present in the fingerprints, the strength of the evidence degrades drastically with noise in the sensed fingerprint images, (3) the performance of the state-of-the-art automatic fingerprint matchers is not even close to the theoretical limit, and (4) because automatic fingerprint verification systems based on minutia use only a part of the discriminatory information present in the fingerprints, it may be desirable to explore additional complementary representations of fingerprints for automatic matching. Sharath Pankanti, Salil Prabhakar, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2002 | On the similarity of identical twin fingerprints
Anil K. Jain 0001, Salil Prabhakar, Sharath Pankanti |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |
| 2002 | Decision-level fusion in fingerprint verification
Salil Prabhakar, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
Pattern Recognit. | 1 |
| 2001 | On the Individuality of FingerprintsabstractFingerprint identification is based on two basic premises: (i) persistence: the basic characteristics of fingerprints do not change with time; and (ii) individuality: the fingerprint is unique to an individual. The validity of the first premise has been established. While the second premise is generally accepted to be true, the underlying scientific basis of fingerprint individuality has not been formally tested. We address the problem of fingerprint individuality by quantifying the amount of information available in minutiae points to establish a correspondence between two fingerprint images. We derive an expression which estimates the probability of falsely associating minutiae-based representations from two arbitrary fingerprints. For example, the probability that a fingerprint with 36 minutiae points will share 12 minutiae points with another arbitrarily chosen fingerprint with 36 minutiae points is 6.10/spl times/10/sup -8/. These probability estimates are compared with typical fingerprint matcher accuracy results. Our results show that: (i) fingerprint matching is not infallible and leads to some false associations, (ii) the performance of automatic fingerprint matcher does not even come close to the theoretical performance, and (iii) due to the limited information content of the minutiae-based representation, automatic system designers should explore the use of non-minutiae-based information present in the fingerprints. Sharath Pankanti, Salil Prabhakar, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
CVPR (1) | 2 |
| 2001 | Fingerprint matching using minutiae and texture featuresabstractThe advent of solid-state fingerprint sensors presents a fresh challenge to traditional fingerprint matching algorithms. These sensors provide a small contact area (/spl ap/0.6"/spl times/0.6") for the fingertip and, therefore, sense only a limited portion of the fingerprint. Thus multiple impressions of the same fingerprint may have only a small region of overlap. Minutiae-based matching algorithms, which consider ridge activity only in the vicinity of minutiae points, are not likely to perform well on these images due to the insufficient number of corresponding points in the input and template images. We present a hybrid matching algorithm that uses both minutiae (point) information and texture (region) information for matching the fingerprints. Results obtained on the MSU-VERIDICOM database shows that a combination of the texture-based and minutiae-based matching scores leads to a substantial improvement in the overall matching performance. Anil K. Jain 0001, Arun Ross, Salil Prabhakar |
ICIP (3) | 3 |
| 2000 | Minutia Verification and Classification for Fingerprint MatchingabstractWe propose a feedback path for the feature extraction stage, followed by a feature refinement stage for improving the matching performance. This performance improvement is illustrated in the context of a minutia-based fingerprint verification system. We show that a minutia verification stage based on re-examining the gray-scale profile in a detected minutia's spatial neighborhood in the sensed image can improve the matching performance by /spl sim/4% on our database. Further, we show that a feature refinement stage which assigns a class label to each detected minutia (ridge ending and ridge bifurcation) before matching can also improve the matching performance by /spl sim/3%. A combination of feedback (minutia verification) in the feature extraction phase and feature refinement (minutia classification) improves the overall performance of the fingerprint verification system by /spl sim/8%. Salil Prabhakar, Anil K. Jain 0001, Sharath Pankanti, Ruud M. Bolle |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2000 | Filterbank-based fingerprint matchingabstractWith identity fraud in our society reaching unprecedented proportions and with an increasing emphasis on the emerging automatic personal identification applications, biometrics-based verification, especially fingerprint-based identification, is receiving a lot of attention. There are two major shortcomings of the traditional approaches to fingerprint representation. For a considerable fraction of population, the representations based on explicit detection of complete ridge structures in the fingerprint are difficult to extract automatically. The widely used minutiae-based representation does not utilize a significant component of the rich discriminatory information available in the fingerprints. Local ridge structures cannot be completely characterized by minutiae. Further, minutiae-based matching has difficulty in quickly matching two fingerprint images containing a different number of unregistered minutiae points. The proposed filter-based algorithm uses a bank of Gabor filters to capture both local and global details in a fingerprint as a compact fixed length FingerCode. The fingerprint matching is based on the Euclidean distance between the two corresponding FingerCodes and hence is extremely fast. We are able to achieve a verification accuracy which is only marginally inferior to the best results of minutiae-based algorithms published in the open literature. Our system performs better than a state-of-the-art minutiae-based system when the performance requirement of the application system does not demand a very low false acceptance rate. Finally, we show that the matching performance can be improved by combining the decisions of the matchers based on complementary (minutiae-based and filter-based) fingerprint information. Anil K. Jain 0001, Salil Prabhakar, Lin Hong, Sharath Pankanti |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 2 |
| 1999 | FingerCode: A Filterbank for Fingerprint Representation and MatchingabstractWith the identity fraud in our society reaching unprecedented proportions and with an increasing emphasis on the emerging automatic positive personal identification applications, biometrics-based identification, especially fingerprint-based identification, is receiving a lot of attention. There are two major shortcomings of the traditional approaches to fingerprint representation. For a significant fraction of population, the representations based on explicit detection of complete ridge structures in the fingerprint are difficult to extract automatically. The widely used minutiae-based representation does not utilize a significant component of the rich discriminatory information, available in the fingerprints. The proposed filter-based algorithm uses a bank of Gabor filters to capture both the local and the global details in a fingerprint as a compact 640-byte fixed length FingerCode. The fingerprint matching is based on the Euclidean distance between the two corresponding FingerCodes and hence is extremely fast. Our initial results show identification accuracies comparable to the best results of minutiae-based algorithms published in the open literature. Finally, we show that the matching performance can be improved by combining the decisions of the matchers based on complementary fingerprint information. Anil K. Jain 0001, Salil Prabhakar, Lin Hong, Sharath Pankanti |
CVPR | 2 |
| 1999 | A filterbank-based representation for classification and matching of fingerprintsabstractWe view fingerprints as oriented texture patterns, textures which exhibit an inherent and well-defined sense of directionality. Given a fingerprint image, we demonstrate that reliable translation and rotation invariant representations can be built based entirely on the inherent properties of the underlying fingerprint texture. We also illustrate that the representations thus derived are useful for robust discrimination of the fingerprints. In particular, we present the application of our novel representation scheme for solving the problems of fingerprint classification and matching on large datasets of fingerprint images acquired in real situations. The proposed scheme of generic representation for oriented textures relies on extracting one or more invariant frames of reference of the oriented texture based on an analysis of its orientation field. The fingerprint classification is based on a two-stage classifier which uses a K-NN classifier in its first stage and a set of neural network classifiers in its second stage. Anil K. Jain 0001, Salil Prabhakar, Sharath Pankanti |
IJCNN | 2 |
| 1999 | A Multichannel Approach to Fingerprint ClassificationabstractFingerprint classification provides an important indexing mechanism in a fingerprint database. An accurate and consistent classification can greatly reduce fingerprint matching time for a large database. We present a fingerprint classification algorithm which is able to achieve an accuracy better than previously reported in the literature. We classify fingerprints into five categories: whorl, right loop, left loop, arch, and tented arch. The algorithm uses a novel representation (FingerCode) and is based on a two-stage classifier to make a classification. It has been tested on 4000 images in the NIST-4 database. For the five-class problem, a classification accuracy of 90 percent is achieved (with a 1.8 percent rejection during the feature extraction phase). For the four-class problem (arch and tented arch combined into one class), we are able to achieve a classification accuracy of 94.8 percent (with 1.8 percent rejection). By incorporating a reject option at the classifier, the classification accuracy can be increased to 96 percent for the five-class classification task, and to 97.8 percent for the four-class classification task after a total of 32.5 percent of the images are rejected. Anil K. Jain 0001, Salil Prabhakar, Lin Hong |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 1999 | Combining multiple matchers for a high security fingerprint verification system
Anil K. Jain 0001, Salil Prabhakar, Shaoyun Chen |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 2 |