Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Dixon
dblp:78/2856
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9282-3175ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 60% Hardware security and side channels · 39% Network security · 0% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 99% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 1% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
learning with errors |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learnability of Optical Physical Unclonable Functions Through the Lens of Learning With Errors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives
physical unclonable function |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learnability of Optical Physical Unclonable Functions Through the Lens of Learning With Errors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learnability of Optical Physical Unclonable Functions Through the Lens of Learning With Errors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
feature tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On analyzing video with very small motions · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On analyzing video with very small motions · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On analyzing video with very small motions · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On analyzing video with very small motions · CVPR 2011 |
Distributed systems
distributed coordination |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | High-Latency, Low-Bandwidth Windowing in the Jupiter Collaboration System · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1995 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › parallel string algorithms
parallel parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Compose-Reduce Parsing · ACL 1991 |
Automata and formal languages › parsing
context-free grammar parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Compose-Reduce Parsing · ACL 1991 |
Automata and formal languages
parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Compose-Reduce Parsing · ACL 1991 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › belief revision
truth maintenance systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Massively Parallel Assumption-Based Truth Maintenance · AAAI 1988 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Massively Parallel Assumption-Based Truth Maintenance · AAAI 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear regression · 0.9PAC learning · 0.9dense optical flow · 0.1PCA decomposition · 0.1windowing protocol · 0.0proxy architecture · 0.0truth maintenance · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learnability of Optical Physical Unclonable Functions Through the Lens of Learning With ErrorsabstractWe show that a class of optical physical unclonable functions (PUFs) can be efficiently PAC-learned to arbitrary precision with arbitrarily high probability, even in the presence of intentionally injected noise, given access to polynomially many challenge-response pairs, under mild and practical assumptions about the distributions of the noise and challenge vectors. We motivate our analysis by identifying similarities between the integrated version of Pappu’s original optical PUF design and the post-quantum Learning with Errors (LWE) cryptosystem. We derive polynomial bounds for the required number of samples and the computational complexity of a linear regression algorithm, based on size parameters of the PUF, the distributions of the challenge and noise vectors, and the desired accuracy and probability of success of the regression algorithm. We use a similar analysis to that done by Bootle et al. [“LWE without modular reduction and improved side-channel attacks against BLISS,” in Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2018], who demonstrated a learning attack on poorly implemented versions of LWE cryptosystems. This extends the results of Rührmair et al. [“Optical PUFs reloaded,” Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2013], who presented a theoretical framework showing that a subset of this class of PUFs is learnable in polynomial time in the absence of injected noise, under the assumption that the optics of the PUF were either linear or had negligible nonlinear effects. (Rührmair et al. also included an experimental validation of this technique, which of course included measurement uncertainty, demonstrating robustness to the presence of natural noise.) We recommend that the design of strong PUFs should be treated as a cryptographic engineering problem in physics, as PUF designs would benefit greatly from basing their physics and security on standard cryptographic assumptions. Finally, we identify future research directions, including suggestions for how to modify an LWE-based optical PUF design to better defend against cryptanalytic attacks. Apollo Albright, Boris Gelfand, Michael Dixon |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 3 |
| 2014 | Numerical Tic-Tac-Toe on the 4×4 Board
Bryce Sandlund, Kerrick Staley, Michael Dixon, Steve Butler |
COCOON | 3 |
| 2011 | On analyzing video with very small motionsabstractWe characterize a class of videos consisting of very small but potentially complicated motions. We find that in these scenes, linear appearance variations have a direct relationship to scene motions. We show how to interpret appearance variations captured through a PCA decomposition of the image set as a scene-specific non-parametric motion basis. We propose fast, robust tools for dense flow estimates that are effective in scenes with small motions and potentially large image noise. We show example results in a variety of applications, including motion segmentation and long-term point tracking. Michael Dixon, Austin Abrams, Nathan Jacobs, Robert Pless |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2011 | Measuring optical distortion in aircraft transparencies: a fully automated system for quantitative evaluation
Michael Dixon, Robert Glaubius, Philip Freeman, Robert Pless, Michael P. Gleason, Matthew M. Thomas, William D. Smart |
Mach. Vis. Appl. | 1 |
| 2007 | Faster and more accurate face detection on mobile robots using geometric constraintsabstractWe develop a framework to allow generic object detection algorithms to exploit geometric information commonly available to robot vision systems. Robot systems take pictures with calibrated cameras from known positions and may simultaneously capture depth measurements in the scene. This allows known constraints on the 3D size and position of objects to be translated into constraints on potential locations and scales of objects in the image, eliminating potentially expensive image operations for geometrically infeasible object locations. We show this integration to be very natural in the context of face detection and find that the computational effort of the standard Viola Jones face detector (as implemented in OpenCV) can be reduced by 85 percent with three times fewer false positives. Michael Dixon, Frederick Heckel, Robert Pless, William D. Smart |
IROS | 1 |
| 2003 | Say Cheese!: Experiences with a Robot Photographer
Zachary Byers, Michael Dixon, William D. Smart, Cindy Grimm |
IAAI | 2 |
| 2003 | An autonomous robot photographerabstractWe describe a complete, end-to-end system for taking well-composed photographs using a mobile robot. The general scenario is a reception, or other event, where people are roaming around talking to each other. The robot serves as an "event photographer", roaming around the same space as the participants, periodically taking photographs. These images are then sent to a workstation where participants can print the photographs out, or email them. Zachary Byers, Michael Dixon, Kevin Goodier, Cindy Grimm, William D. Smart |
IROS | 2 |
| 1995 | The Jupiter Audio/Video Architecture: Secure Multimedia in Network PlacesabstractNo abstract available. Pavel Curtis, Michael Dixon, Ron Frederick, David A. Nichols |
ACM Multimedia | 2 |
| 1995 | High-Latency, Low-Bandwidth Windowing in the Jupiter Collaboration SystemabstractArticle High-latency, low-bandwidth windowing in the Jupiter collaboration system Share on Authors: David A. Nichols Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CA Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CAView Profile , Pavel Curtis Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CA Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CAView Profile , Michael Dixon Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CA Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CAView Profile , John Lamping Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CA Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd., Palo Alto, CAView Profile Authors Info & Claims UIST '95: Proceedings of the 8th annual ACM symposium on User interface and software technologyDecember 1995 Pages 111–120https://doi.org/10.1145/215585.215706Online:01 December 1995Publication History 99citation2,591DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations99Total Downloads2,591Last 12 Months44Last 6 weeks3 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access David A. Nichols, Pavel Curtis, Michael Dixon, John Lamping |
ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology | 3 |
| 1991 | Compose-Reduce ParsingabstractTwo new parsing algorithms for context-free phrase structure grammars are presented which perform a bounded amount of processing per word per analysis path, independently of sentence length. They are thus capable of parsing in real-time in a parallel implementation which forks processors in response to non-deterministic choice points. Henry S. Thompson, Michael Dixon, John Lamping |
ACL | 2 |
| 1988 | Massively Parallel Assumption-Based Truth Maintenance
Michael Dixon, Johan de Kleer |
AAAI | 1 |