Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

M. Ligr

dblp:78/3179 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Environmental and earth informatics › ecological modeling
plant growth modeling
0.011995
Calculation of the photoperiod length · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1995
Environmental and earth informatics
environmental modeling
0.011995
Calculation of the photoperiod length · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative algorithm evaluation · 0.0astronomical equation system · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Calculation of the photoperiod length
abstract
This paper describes an algorithm for calculating the photoperiod length (daylength as intercepted by plants) with special emphasis on its use in models describing plant growth and development. The ability to calculate simply and exactly the length of the day for different locations is essential not only for the models describing photoperiodic effects on plant development but also for the simulation of the daily sum of the produced photosynthates or the calculation of the average daily temperature. Two previously published algorithms for calculation of photoperiod length were compared with ours, based on the system of equations describing movement of earth around the sun. The curve gained when plotting daylengths calculated by our algorithm against a particular date is asymmetrical with respect to daylength in equinoxes, while the curve showing the data calculated by both compared algorithms is apparently symmetrical. The differences between our algorithm and the other two algorithms increase with increasing latitude: at 50 degrees N they are in the range of 6.9-13.8 min. We have also demonstrated an effect of location height, geographical longitude and a year on calculated daylength of a particular day.
M. Ligr, C. Ron, L. Natr
Comput. Appl. Biosci.1