Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Clark

dblp:78/6661 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
10as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 10 first-author · 4 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
13 papers
Generative modeling · 28% Language models and text generation · 16% Information extraction and text analysis · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 29 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.422024
Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards · ICLR 2024
Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero Shot Classifiers · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
generative classifier
0.812024
Intriguing Properties of Generative Classifiers · ICLR 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.812024
Intriguing Properties of Generative Classifiers · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion model adaptation
reward fine-tuning
0.812024
Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Intriguing Properties of Generative Classifiers · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution
0.732016
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mention-Ranking Coreference Models · EMNLP 2016
Improving Coreference Resolution by Learning Entity-Level Distributed Representations · ACL (1) 2016
Entity-Centric Coreference Resolution with Model Stacking · ACL (1) 2015
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.712023
Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero Shot Classifiers · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification
0.712023
Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero Shot Classifiers · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › large language model benchmarking
dynamic evaluation
0.612022
Meta-Learning Fast Weight Language Models · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation
0.612022
Meta-Learning Fast Weight Language Models · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.612022
Meta-Learning Fast Weight Language Models · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining
0.412020
Pre-Training Transformers as Energy-Based Cloze Models · EMNLP (1) 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.412020
ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
replaced token detection
0.412020
ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators · ICLR 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text representation
text encoder
0.412020
ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.412019
BAM! Born-Again Multi-Task Networks for Natural Language Understanding · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.412019
BAM! Born-Again Multi-Task Networks for Natural Language Understanding · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.312018
Semi-Supervised Sequence Modeling with Cross-View Training · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.312018
Semi-Supervised Sequence Modeling with Cross-View Training · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.212016
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mention-Ranking Coreference Models · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.212016
Inducing Domain-Specific Sentiment Lexicons from Unlabeled Corpora · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
sentiment lexicon construction
0.212016
Inducing Domain-Specific Sentiment Lexicons from Unlabeled Corpora · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
stacking
0.212015
Entity-Centric Coreference Resolution with Model Stacking · ACL (1) 2015
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal representation
image-text representation
0.212023
Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero Shot Classifiers · NeurIPS 2023
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
review mining
0.112012
RevMiner: an extractive interface for navigating reviews on a smartphone · UIST 2012
Interaction techniques and input
mobile interaction
0.112012
RevMiner: an extractive interface for navigating reviews on a smartphone · UIST 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.112018
Semi-Supervised Sequence Modeling with Cross-View Training · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.112016
Inducing Domain-Specific Sentiment Lexicons from Unlabeled Corpora · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
opinion extraction
0.012012
RevMiner: an extractive interface for navigating reviews on a smartphone · UIST 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-shot classification · 1.4reward backpropagation · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8denoising likelihood · 0.7linear attention · 0.6fast weight layers · 0.6noise contrastive estimation · 0.4discriminator training · 0.4contrastive learning · 0.4BERT · 0.4natural language processing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards
abstract
We present Direct Reward Fine-Tuning (DRaFT), a simple and effective method for fine-tuning diffusion models to maximize differentiable reward functions, such as scores from human preference models. We first show that it is possible to backpropagate the reward function gradient through the full sampling procedure, and that doing so achieves strong performance on a variety of rewards, outperforming reinforcement learning-based approaches. We then propose more efficient variants of DRaFT: DRaFT-K, which truncates backpropagation to only the last K steps of sampling, and DRaFT-LV, which obtains lower-variance gradient estimates for the case when K=1. We show that our methods work well for a variety of reward functions and can be used to substantially improve the aesthetic quality of images generated by Stable Diffusion 1.4. Finally, we draw connections between our approach and prior work, providing a unifying perspective on the design space of gradient-based fine-tuning algorithms.
Kevin Clark, Paul Vicol, Kevin Swersky, David J. Fleet
ICLR1
2024 Intriguing Properties of Generative Classifiers
abstract
What is the best paradigm to recognize objects---discriminative inference (fast but potentially prone to shortcut learning) or using a generative model (slow but potentially more robust)? We build on recent advances in generative modeling that turn text-to-image models into classifiers. This allows us to study their behavior and to compare them against discriminative models and human psychophysical data. We report four intriguing emergent properties of generative classifiers: they show a record-breaking human-like shape bias (99% for Imagen), near human-level out-of-distribution accuracy, state-of-the-art alignment with human classification errors, and they understand certain perceptual illusions. Our results indicate that while the current dominant paradigm for modeling human object recognition is discriminative inference, zero-shot generative models approximate human object recognition data surprisingly well.
Priyank Jaini, Kevin Clark, Robert Geirhos
ICLR2
2023 Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero Shot Classifiers
abstract
The excellent generative capabilities of text-to-image diffusion models suggest they learn informative representations of image-text data. However, what knowledge their representations capture is not fully understood, and they have not been thoroughly explored on downstream tasks. We investigate diffusion models by proposing a method for evaluating them as zero-shot classifiers. The key idea is using a diffusion model's ability to denoise a noised image given a text description of a label as a proxy for that label's likelihood. We apply our method to Stable Diffusion and Imagen, using it to probe fine-grained aspects of the models' knowledge and comparing them with CLIP's zero-shot abilities. They perform competitively with CLIP on a wide range of zero-shot image classification datasets. Additionally, they achieve state-of-the-art results on shape/texture bias tests and can successfully perform attribute binding while CLIP cannot. Although generative pre-training is prevalent in NLP, visual foundation models often use other methods such as contrastive learning. Based on our findings, we argue that generative pre-training should be explored as a compelling alternative for vision and vision-language problems.
Kevin Clark, Priyank Jaini
NeurIPS1
2022 Meta-Learning Fast Weight Language Models
abstract
Dynamic evaluation of language models (LMs) adapts model parameters at test time using gradient information from previous tokens and substantially improves LM performance.However, it requires over 3x more compute than standard inference.We present Fast Weight Layers (FWLs), a neural component that provides the benefits of dynamic evaluation much more efficiently by expressing gradient updates as linear attention.A key improvement over dynamic evaluation is that FWLs can also be applied at training time so the model learns to make good use of gradient updates.FWLs can easily be added on top of existing transformer models, require relatively little extra compute or memory to run, and significantly improve language modeling perplexity.
Kevin Clark, Kelvin Guu, Ming-Wei Chang, Panupong Pasupat, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Mohammad Norouzi 0002
EMNLP1
2020 Pre-Training Transformers as Energy-Based Cloze Models
abstract
We introduce Electric, an energy-based cloze model for representation learning over text.Like BERT, it is a conditional generative model of tokens given their contexts.However, Electric does not use masking or output a full distribution over tokens that could occur in a context.Instead, it assigns a scalar energy score to each input token indicating how likely it is given its context.We train Electric using an algorithm based on noise-contrastive estimation and elucidate how this learning objective is closely related to the recently proposed ELECTRA pre-training method.Electric performs well when transferred to downstream tasks and is particularly effective at producing likelihood scores for text: it reranks speech recognition n-best lists better than language models and much faster than masked language models.Furthermore, it offers a clearer and more principled view of what ELECTRA learns during pre-training.
Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. Manning
EMNLP (1)1
2020 ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators
Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. Manning
ICLR1
2019 BAM! Born-Again Multi-Task Networks for Natural Language Understanding
abstract
It can be challenging to train multi-task neural networks that outperform or even match their single-task counterparts.To help address this, we propose using knowledge distillation where single-task models teach a multi-task model.We enhance this training with teacher annealing, a novel method that gradually transitions the model from distillation to supervised learning, helping the multi-task model surpass its single-task teachers.We evaluate our approach by multi-task fine-tuning BERT on the GLUE benchmark.Our method consistently improves over standard single-task and multi-task training.
Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Urvashi Khandelwal, Christopher D. Manning, Quoc V. Le
ACL (1)1
2018 Semi-Supervised Sequence Modeling with Cross-View Training
abstract
Unsupervised representation learning algorithms such as word2vec and ELMo improve the accuracy of many supervised NLP models, mainly because they can take advantage of large amounts of unlabeled text.However, the supervised models only learn from taskspecific labeled data during the main training phase.We therefore propose Cross-View Training (CVT), a semi-supervised learning algorithm that improves the representations of a Bi-LSTM sentence encoder using a mix of labeled and unlabeled data.On labeled examples, standard supervised learning is used.On unlabeled examples, CVT teaches auxiliary prediction modules that see restricted views of the input (e.g., only part of a sentence) to match the predictions of the full model seeing the whole input.Since the auxiliary modules and the full model share intermediate representations, this in turn improves the full model.Moreover, we show that CVT is particularly effective when combined with multitask learning.We evaluate CVT on five sequence tagging tasks, machine translation, and dependency parsing, achieving state-of-the-art results. 1
Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Christopher D. Manning, Quoc V. Le
EMNLP1
2016 Improving Coreference Resolution by Learning Entity-Level Distributed Representations
abstract
A long-standing challenge in coreference resolution has been the incorporation of entity-level information - features defined over clusters of mentions instead of mention pairs. We present a neural network based coreference system that produces high-dimensional vector representations for pairs of coreference clusters. Using these representations, our system learns when combining clusters is desirable. We train the system with a learning-to-search algorithm that teaches it which local decisions (cluster merges) will lead to a high-scoring final coreference partition. The system substantially outperforms the current state-of-the-art on the English and Chinese portions of the CoNLL 2012 Shared Task dataset despite using few hand-engineered features.
Kevin Clark, Christopher D. Manning
ACL (1)1
2016 Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mention-Ranking Coreference Models
abstract
Coreference resolution systems are typically trained with heuristic loss functions that require careful tuning.In this paper we instead apply reinforcement learning to directly optimize a neural mention-ranking model for coreference evaluation metrics.We experiment with two approaches: the REINFORCE policy gradient algorithm and a rewardrescaled max-margin objective.We find the latter to be more effective, resulting in a significant improvement over the current stateof-the-art on the English and Chinese portions of the CoNLL 2012 Shared Task.
Kevin Clark, Christopher D. Manning
EMNLP1
2016 Inducing Domain-Specific Sentiment Lexicons from Unlabeled Corpora
abstract
A word's sentiment depends on the domain in which it is used. Computational social science research thus requires sentiment lexicons that are specific to the domains being studied. We combine domain-specific word embeddings with a label propagation framework to induce accurate domain-specific sentiment lexicons using small sets of seed words. We show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on inducing sentiment lexicons from domain-specific corpora and that our purely corpus-based approach outperforms methods that rely on hand-curated resources (e.g., WordNet). Using our framework, we induce and release historical sentiment lexicons for 150 years of English and community-specific sentiment lexicons for 250 online communities from the social media forum Reddit. The historical lexicons we induce show that more than 5% of sentiment-bearing (non-neutral) English words completely switched polarity during the last 150 years, and the community-specific lexicons highlight how sentiment varies drastically between different communities.
William L. Hamilton, Kevin Clark, Jure Leskovec, Daniel Jurafsky
EMNLP2
2016 Large-scale Analysis of Counseling Conversations: An Application of Natural Language Processing to Mental Health
abstract
Mental illness is one of the most pressing public health issues of our time. While counseling and psychotherapy can be effective treatments, our knowledge about how to conduct successful counseling conversations has been limited due to lack of large-scale data with labeled outcomes of the conversations. In this paper, we present a large-scale, quantitative study on the discourse of text-message-based counseling conversations. We develop a set of novel computational discourse analysis methods to measure how various linguistic aspects of conversations are correlated with conversation outcomes. Applying techniques such as sequence-based conversation models, language model comparisons, message clustering, and psycholinguistics-inspired word frequency analyses, we discover actionable conversation strategies that are associated with better conversation outcomes.
Tim Althoff, Kevin Clark, Jure Leskovec
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2015 Entity-Centric Coreference Resolution with Model Stacking
abstract
Kevin Clark, Christopher D. Manning. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Kevin Clark, Christopher D. Manning
ACL (1)1
2012 RevMiner: an extractive interface for navigating reviews on a smartphone
abstract
Smartphones are convenient, but their small screens make searching, clicking, and reading awkward. Thus, perusing product reviews on a smartphone is difficult. In response, we introduce RevMiner - a novel smartphone interface that utilizes Natural Language Processing techniques to analyze and navigate reviews. RevMiner was run over 300K Yelp restaurant reviews extracting attribute-value pairs, where attributes represent restaurant attributes such as sushi and service, and values represent opinions about the attributes such as fresh or fast. These pairs were aggregated and used to: 1) answer queries such as "cheap Indian food", 2) concisely present information about each restaurant, and 3) identify similar restaurants. Our user studies demonstrate that on a smartphone, participants preferred RevMiner's interface to tag clouds and color bars, and that they preferred RevMiner's results to Yelp's, particularly for conjunctive queries (e.g., "great food and huge portions"). Demonstrations of RevMiner are available at revminer.com.
Jeff Huang 0002, Oren Etzioni, Luke Zettlemoyer, Kevin Clark, Christian Lee
UIST4
2004 Effect of visual cues on human performance in navigating through a virtual maze
abstract
Navigation in Virtual Environments (VEs) requires users to develop spatial knowledge of the environment primarily through visual cues provided to the user. Thus, the design and display of visual navigation cues is important for efficient navigation in a VE. In this paper, we report the results of an experiment in which three different visual cues were tested for their benefit toward users' navigation in a 3D virtual maze. The experiment varied the form of visual cue: a 2D map, a 2D map with a directionally ambiguous cue, and a 2D map with a directional cue. Eye tracking data was collected and analyzed to examine the correlation between the type of visual cue presented and the navigational efficiency of the user through the virtual maze. It was observed that the cue type affected performance of the participant in the 3D maze. The directional cue was most effective in the time taken by users to reach the center of the maze. Results of this study have implications for VE design as well as for game development.
Deepak Vembar, Nikhil Iyengar, Andrew T. Duchowski, Kevin Clark, Jason Hewitt, Keith Pauls
EGVE4