Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nihar R. Mohapatra

dblp:78/6762 · also Nihar Ranjan Mohapatra · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8827-5417ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 72% Integrated circuit design · 28%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
design optimization
1.622026
Inverse Design of High Power and High Voltage LDMOS Transistors Using Deep Learning-Based Sample-Efficient Surrogate Model · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Dispersion in Placement: Quantification and Insights · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Electronic design automation
analog and mixed-signal design automation
1.012026
Inverse Design of High Power and High Voltage LDMOS Transistors Using Deep Learning-Based Sample-Efficient Surrogate Model · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices
device design
1.012026
Inverse Design of High Power and High Voltage LDMOS Transistors Using Deep Learning-Based Sample-Efficient Surrogate Model · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Electronic design automation › design optimization
surrogate model-based optimization
1.012026
Inverse Design of High Power and High Voltage LDMOS Transistors Using Deep Learning-Based Sample-Efficient Surrogate Model · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.722022
Dispersion in Placement: Quantification and Insights · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Gradient Error Compensation in SC-MDACs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement
0.612022
Dispersion in Placement: Quantification and Insights · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Integrated circuit design › analog and mixed-signal circuits
data converters
0.412020
Gradient Error Compensation in SC-MDACs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Integrated circuit design
power semiconductor devices
0.312026
Inverse Design of High Power and High Voltage LDMOS Transistors Using Deep Learning-Based Sample-Efficient Surrogate Model · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026
Integrated circuit design
device mismatch
0.212022
Dispersion in Placement: Quantification and Insights · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement and routing
0.112020
Gradient Error Compensation in SC-MDACs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

differential evolution · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0bayesian optimization · 1.0TCAD simulation · 1.0dispersion measures · 0.6routing solution · 0.4placement techniques · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Inverse Design of High Power and High Voltage LDMOS Transistors Using Deep Learning-Based Sample-Efficient Surrogate Model
abstract
Device design using Machine Learning has been used in the semiconductor industry over the past ten years. However, the generation of the training data set for precise predictions using this technique remains burdensome. Addressing this, in this work, we propose eight sample-efficient techniques to train the Deep Neural Network (DNN) based surrogate models that emulate Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD). We showcase their efficacy by predicting off-state breakdown voltage (BVDS,off) and specific on-resistance (Rsp) of a Laterally Diffused Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field-effect Transistor (LDMOSFET). Our findings highlight the potential for 38% reduction in training dataset size while maintaining a strong predictive baseline accuracy. Specifically, the Diverse Representative-Query-by-Committee (DR-QBC) technique works best yielding 6.5% Euclidean Norm of Prediction Error (ENPE). We also demonstrate an inverse design framework by leveraging the same surrogate model with Differential Evolution (DE) and Bayesian Optimizer (BO). It mimics the role of a device design engineer by optimizing the values of structural parameters of the LDMOS transistors such that the desired BVDS,off is attained while minimizing Rsp.
Rutu Patel, Ravi S. Hegde, Nihar R. Mohapatra
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3
2024 A Programmable and Adaptive Dead-Time Controller for Low-Offset Output Generation for Cryo-Cooler Drive Applications
abstract
This paper proposes a dead-time control circuit to generate independent and adaptive delays for the rise and fall time duration. The circuit comprises a rise/fall time detector, rise/fall time to voltage converter and switch capacitor-based charge integrator block to generate the adaptive dead-time. The proposed adaptive dead-time controller design implemented using a 0.18μm HV CMOS process, occupies 170μm x 90μm silicon area. The results show good accuracy in the dead-time generation with an error <±3.5ns. In post-layout simulation, the design provides sinusoidal output with a very low offset voltage of 70mV.
Hari Shanker Gupta, Anuj Srivastava, Nihar R. Mohapatra
ISCAS4
2022 Dispersion in Placement: Quantification and Insights
abstract
The linearity of data converters fabricated in modern CMOS processes is typically limited by device mismatch. The dispersion in device placement primarily determines the extent of matching and hence, the chip yield. Till date, there exists no straightforward approach to precisely quantify dispersion over an array of identically laid out devices. The current research formulates new measures to quantify dispersion in device placement. The incorporation of such measures in traditional CAD optimization results in similar or even better correlation coefficients, but with a lighter computational footprint. This facilitates for faster optimization of large device placements without the need for high end processors.
Satyajit Mohapatra, Nihar R. Mohapatra
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
2020 Gradient Error Compensation in SC-MDACs
abstract
High speed data converter architectures such as pipelined analog-to-digital-converters (ADCs) typically consist of large capacitor arrays that are highly susceptible to systematic errors. Although significant efforts have been made in the literature to compensate linear and parabolic errors, the rotated parabolic components are less explored. These rotated parabolic components are responsible for spurious harmonics at the output of the converter, thereby degrading the linearity. In this article, we have investigated the origin of these rotated components, their impact on conversion linearity and discussed strategies to mitigate them. A placement technique along with one track routing solution, is proposed for complete compensation of the systematic errors. An algorithm is also provided to extend this technique to higher resolutions. The proposed technique is verified on the model of pipelined ADC, as well as current steering DAC. The incorporation of such technique results in near ideal linearity performance.
Satyajit Mohapatra, Nihar R. Mohapatra
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2