Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Krishna Desai

dblp:78/7527 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › information visualization › information retrieval visualization
search result visualization
0.112009
ResultMaps: Visualization for Search Interfaces · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2009
Visualization and visual analytics › hierarchical data visualization
treemap
0.112009
ResultMaps: Visualization for Search Interfaces · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2009
Information retrieval
search interfaces
0.012009
ResultMaps: Visualization for Search Interfaces · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 ResultMaps: Visualization for Search Interfaces
abstract
Hierarchical representations are common in digital repositories, yet are not always fully leveraged in their online search interfaces. This work describes ResultMaps, which use hierarchical treemap representations with query string-driven digital library search engines. We describe two lab experiments, which find that ResultsMap users yield significantly better results over a control condition on some subjective measures, and we find evidence that ResultMaps have ancillary benefits via increased understanding of some aspects of repository content. The ResultMap system and experiments contribute an understanding of the benefits--direct and indirect--of the ResultMap approach to repository search visualization.
Edward Clarkson, Krishna Desai, James D. Foley
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2