Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gregory A. Northrop

dblp:78/874 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 96% Integrated circuit design · 4%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.122003
Physical synthesis methodology for high performance microprocessors · DAC 2003
A Semi-Custom Design Flow in High-Performance Microprocessor Design · DAC 2001
Electronic design automation › physical design
timing optimization
0.012003
Physical synthesis methodology for high performance microprocessors · DAC 2003
Electronic design automation › design management
design reuse
0.012003
Libraries: lifejacket or straitjacket · DAC 2003
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
logic optimization
0.012003
Physical synthesis methodology for high performance microprocessors · DAC 2003
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.012003
Physical synthesis methodology for high performance microprocessors · DAC 2003
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement
0.012003
Physical synthesis methodology for high performance microprocessors · DAC 2003
Integrated circuit design › ASIC design
semi-custom design
0.012001
A Semi-Custom Design Flow in High-Performance Microprocessor Design · DAC 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

physical design tools · 0.0automated tuning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Backend CAD flows for "restrictive design rules"
abstract
To meet challenges of deep-subwavelength technologies (particularly 130 nm and following), lithography has come to rely increasingly on data processes such as shape fill, optical proximity correction, and RETs like altPSM. For emerging technologies (65 nm and following) the computation cost and complexity of these techniques are themselves becoming bottlenecks in the design-silicon flow. This has motivated the recent calls for restrictive design rules such as fixed width/pitch/orientation of gate-forming polysilicon features. We have been exploring how design might take advantage of these restrictions, and present some preliminary ideas for how we might reduce the computational cost throughout the back end of the design flow through the post-tapeout data processes while improving quality of results: the reliability of OPC/RET algorithms and the accuracy of models of manufactured products. We also believe that the underlying technology, including simulation and analysis, may be applicable to a variety of approaches to design for manufacturability (DFM).
Mark A. Lavin, Fook-Luen Heng, Gregory A. Northrop
ICCAD3
2003 Physical synthesis methodology for high performance microprocessors
abstract
Integrated logic synthesis and physical design (physical synthesis) continues to play a very important role in high performance microprocessor design methodologies. In this paper, we present the integrated physical synthesis timing closure methodology used in the current generation microprocessors. Physical synthesis techniques were aggressively used as part of logic and placement optimizations for performance, power and area. The design turn around times were significantly reduced and timing convergence was consistently acheived.
Yiu-Hing Chan, Prabhakar Kudva, Lisa B. Lacey, Gregory A. Northrop, Thomas E. Rosser
DAC4
2003 Libraries: lifejacket or straitjacket
abstract
No abstract available.
Carl Sechen, Barbara Chappel, Jim Hogan, Tadahiko Nakamura, Gregory A. Northrop, Anjaneya Thakar
DAC6
2001 A Semi-Custom Design Flow in High-Performance Microprocessor Design
abstract
In this paper we present techniques shown to significantly enhance the custom circuit design process typical of high-performance microprocessors. This methodology combines flexible custom circuit design with automated tuning and physical design tools to provide new opportunities to optimized design throughout the development cycle.
Gregory A. Northrop, Pong-Fei Lu
DAC1
1998 Deep submicron design techniques for the 500 MHz IBM S/390 G5 custom microprocessor
abstract
High frequency microprocessor designs require rigorous design guidelines, design methodology advancements, and novel approaches in circuit design style for processors operating in the high megahertz range. Timing closure becomes the single most important design issue, however other design metrics such as area, power and noise need to be given equal consideration within the design cycle. Custom design techniques were used through out the logic circuits and arrays as well as the overall design planning for the 500 MHz microprocessor cycle time.
Dale E. Hoffman, Robert M. Averill III, Brian W. Curran, Yuen H. Chan, Allan H. Dansky, Robert F. Hatch, Timothy G. McNamara, Thomas J. McPherson, Gregory A. Northrop, Leon J. Sigal, Anthony Pelella, Patrick M. Williams
ICCD9
1997 Design Methodology for the High-Performance G4 S/390
abstract
This paper describes the methodology employed in the design of the G4 S/390 microprocessor. Issues of verifying design metrics of power, noise, timing, and functional correctness are discussed within the context of a performance-driven transistor-level custom design approach. Semi-automated techniques to encourage designer productivity consistent with the objectives of a high-frequency deep submicron design point are presented as are the practical issues associated with managing the complexity of an 8 million transistor design.
Kenneth L. Shepard, Sean M. Carey, Daniel K. Beece, Robert F. Hatch, Gregory A. Northrop
ICCD5