Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aravind Venkatachalam
dblp:78/9023
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › text mining › text classification
email classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email Classification · ICDM 2010 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email Classification · ICDM 2010 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
supervised learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email Classification · ICDM 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ranking · 0.2graph mining · 0.2TF-IDF · 0.2SVM · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email ClassificationabstractThis paper presents a novel framework for multi-folder email classification using graph mining as the underlying technique. Although several techniques exist (e.g., SVM, TF-IDF, n-gram) for addressing this problem in a delimited context, they heavily rely on extracting high-frequency keywords, thus ignoring the inherent structural aspects of an email (or document in general) which can play a critical role in classification. Some of the models (e.g., n-gram) consider only the words without taking into consideration where in the structure these words appear together. This paper presents a supervised learning model that leverages graph mining techniques for multi-folder email classification. A ranking formula is presented for ordering the representative - common and recurring - substructures generated from pre-classified emails. These ranked representative substructures are then used for categorizing incoming emails. This approach is based on a global ranking model that incorporates several relevant parameters for email classification and overcomes numerous problems faced by extant approaches used for multi-folder classification. A number of parameters which influence the generation of representative substructures are analyzed, reexamined, and adapted to multiple folders. The effect of graph representations has been analyzed. The effectiveness of the proposed approach has been validated experimentally. Sharma Chakravarthy, Aravind Venkatachalam, Aditya Telang |
ICDM | 2 |