Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kyoungup Park
dblp:78/9923
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 36% Representation and self-supervised learning · 31% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
higher-order markov random fields |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | On Learning Higher-Order Consistency Potentials for Multi-class Pixel Labeling · ECCV (2) 2012 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › dense prediction
pixel labeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | On Learning Higher-Order Consistency Potentials for Multi-class Pixel Labeling · ECCV (2) 2012 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | On Learning Higher-Order Consistency Potentials for Multi-class Pixel Labeling · ECCV (2) 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
mahalanobis distance metric learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Efficiently Learning a Distance Metric for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Efficiently Learning a Distance Metric for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › nonparametric classification
nearest neighbor classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Efficiently Learning a Distance Metric for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification · AAAI 2011 |
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
margin maximization |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Efficiently Learning a Distance Metric for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification · AAAI 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
column generation · 0.2higher-order consistency potentials · 0.1alternating projections · 0.1alternating projection · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | On Learning Higher-Order Consistency Potentials for Multi-class Pixel Labeling
Kyoungup Park, Stephen Gould |
ECCV (2) | 1 |
| 2011 | Efficiently Learning a Distance Metric for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor ClassificationabstractWe concern the problem of learning a Mahalanobis distance metric for improving nearest neighbor classification. Our work is built upon the large margin nearest neighbor (LMNN) classification framework. Due to the semidefiniteness constraint in the optimization problem of LMNN, it is not scalable in terms of the dimensionality of the input data. The original LMNN solver partially alleviates this problem by adopting alternating projection methods instead of standard interior-point methods. Still, at each iteration, the computation complexity is at least O(D3) (D is the dimension of input data). In this work, we propose a column generation based algorithm to solve the LMNN optimization problem much more efficiently. Our algorithm is much more scalable in tha tat each iteration, it does not need full eigen-decomposition. Instead, we only need to find the leading eigen value and its corresponding eigen vector, which is of O(D2) complexity. Experiments show the efficiency and efficacy of our algorithms. Kyoungup Park, Chunhua Shen, Zhihui Hao, Junae Kim |
AAAI | 1 |