VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Narcisa Andreea Milea
dblp:79/11343
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
refactoring |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Vector abstraction and concretization for scalable detection of refactorings · SIGSOFT FSE 2014 Scalable detection of missed cross-function refactorings · ISSTA 2014 |
Software maintenance and evolution › refactoring
refactoring recommendation |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Vector abstraction and concretization for scalable detection of refactorings · SIGSOFT FSE 2014 Scalable detection of missed cross-function refactorings · ISSTA 2014 |
Software maintenance and evolution › refactoring
refactoring detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Vector abstraction and concretization for scalable detection of refactorings · SIGSOFT FSE 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vector inlining · 0.2vector concretization · 0.2vector abstraction · 0.2code similarity · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Scalable detection of missed cross-function refactoringsabstractRefactoring is an important way to improve the design of existing code. Identifying refactoring opportunities (i.e., code fragments that can be refactored) in large code bases is a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a novel, automated and scalable technique for identifying cross-function refactoring opportunities that span more than one function (e.g., Extract Method and Inline Method). The key of our technique is the design of efficient vector inlining operations that emulate the effect of method inlining among code fragments, so that the problem of identifying cross-function refactoring can be reduced to the problem of finding similar vectors before and after inlining. We have implemented our technique in a prototype tool named ReDex which encodes Java programs to particular vectors. We have applied the tool to a large code base, 4.5 million lines of code, comprising of 200 bundle projects in the Eclipse ecosystem (e.g., Eclipse JDT, Eclipse PDE, Apache Commons, Hamcrest, etc.). Also, different from many other studies on detecting refactoring, ReDex only searches for code fragments that can be, but have not yet been, refactored in a way similar to some refactoring that happened in the code base. Our results show that ReDex can find 277 cross-function refactoring opportunities in 2 minutes, and 223 cases were labelled as true opportunities by users, and cover many categories of cross-function refactoring operations in classical refactoring books, such as Self Encapsulate Field, Decompose Conditional Expression, Hide Delegate, Preserve Whole Object, etc. Narcisa Andreea Milea, Lingxiao Jiang, Siau-Cheng Khoo |
ISSTA | 1 |
| 2014 | Vector abstraction and concretization for scalable detection of refactoringsabstractAutomated techniques have been proposed to either identify refactoring opportunities (i.e., code fragments that can be but have not yet been restructured in a program), or reconstruct historical refactorings (i.e., code restructuring operations that have happened between different versions of a program). In this paper, we propose a new technique that can detect both refactoring opportunities and historical refactorings in large code bases. The key of our technique is the design of vector abstraction and concretization operations that can encode code changes induced by certain refactorings as characteristic vectors. Thus, the problem of identifying refactorings can be reduced to the problem of identifying matching vectors, which can be solved efficiently. We have implemented our technique for Java. The prototype is applied to 200 bundle projects from the Eclipse ecosystem containing 4.5 million lines of code, and reports in total more than 32K instances of 17 types of refactoring opportunities, taking 25 minutes on average for each type. The prototype is also applied to 14 versions of 3 smaller programs (JMeter, Ant, XML-Security), and detects (1) more than 2.8K refactoring opportunities within individual versions with a precision of about 87%, and (2) more than 190 historical refactorings across consecutive versions of the programs with a precision of about 92%. Narcisa Andreea Milea, Lingxiao Jiang, Siau-Cheng Khoo |
SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |
| 2011 | NORT: Runtime Anomaly-Based Monitoring of Malicious Behavior for Windows
Narcisa Andreea Milea, Siau-Cheng Khoo, David Lo 0001, Cristian Pop |
RV | 1 |