Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chao Ma 0001
dblp:79/1552-1
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
3D vision · 55% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% Video understanding and tracking · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Frame Fusion with Vehicle Motion Prediction for 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling › scene representation
hybrid scene representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lightning NeRF: Efficient Hybrid Scene Representation for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
neural radiance field |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lightning NeRF: Efficient Hybrid Scene Representation for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lightning NeRF: Efficient Hybrid Scene Representation for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
temporal fusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Frame Fusion with Vehicle Motion Prediction for 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Learning Greedy Policies for the Easy-First Framework · AAAI 2015 HC-Search for Multi-Label Prediction: An Empirical Study · AAAI 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
amortized inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Randomized Greedy Search for Structured Prediction: Amortized Inference and Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning and data management
structured prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Randomized Greedy Search for Structured Prediction: Amortized Inference and Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | Prune-and-Score: Learning for Greedy Coreference Resolution · EMNLP 2014 Learning Greedy Policies for the Easy-First Framework · AAAI 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Lightning NeRF: Efficient Hybrid Scene Representation for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Lightning NeRF: Efficient Hybrid Scene Representation for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | HC-Search for Multi-Label Prediction: An Empirical Study · AAAI 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Learning Greedy Policies for the Easy-First Framework · AAAI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unicycle model · 0.8structured SVM · 0.8randomized greedy search · 0.8non-maximum suppression · 0.8bicycle model · 0.8LiDAR geometry prior · 0.8non-convex optimization · 0.2majorization-minimization · 0.2imitation learning · 0.2HC-Search framework · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Lightning NeRF: Efficient Hybrid Scene Representation for Autonomous DrivingabstractRecent studies have highlighted the promising application of NeRF in autonomous driving contexts. However, the complexity of outdoor environments, combined with the restricted viewpoints in driving scenarios, complicates the task of precisely reconstructing scene geometry. Such challenges often lead to diminished quality in reconstructions and extended durations for both training and rendering. To tackle these challenges, we present Lightning NeRF. It uses an efficient hybrid scene representation that effectively utilizes the geometry prior from LiDAR in autonomous driving scenarios. Lightning NeRF significantly improves the novel view synthesis performance of NeRF and reduces computational overheads. Through evaluations on real-world datasets, such as KITTI-360, Argoverse2, and our private dataset, we demonstrate that our approach not only exceeds the current state-of-the-art in novel view synthesis quality but also achieves a five-fold increase in training speed and a ten-fold improvement in rendering speed. Codes are available at https://github.com/VISION-SJTU/Lightning-NeRF. Junyi Cao, Naiyan Wang, Chao Ma 0001 |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2024 | Frame Fusion with Vehicle Motion Prediction for 3D Object DetectionabstractIn LiDAR-based 3D detection, history point clouds contain rich temporal information helpful for future prediction. In the same way, history detections should contribute to future detections. In this paper, we propose a detection enhancement method, namely FrameFusion, which improves 3D object detection results by fusing history detection frames. In FrameFusion, we "forward" history frames to the current frame and apply weighted Non-Maximum-Suppression on dense bounding boxes to obtain a fused frame with merged boxes. To "forward" frames, we use vehicle motion models to estimate the future pose of the bounding boxes. Our method is flexible in motion model selection. We explore three motion models in our work and show how the unicycle model and the bicycle model improve turning cases. On Waymo Open Dataset, our FrameFusion method consistently improves the performance of various 3D detectors by about 2.0 vehicle LEVEL 2 APH with negligible latency and slightly enhances the performance of the temporal fusion method MPPNet. We also conduct extensive experiments on motion model selection. Feng Wang 0015, Naiyan Wang, Chao Ma 0001 |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2019 | Randomized Greedy Search for Structured Prediction: Amortized Inference and LearningabstractIn a structured prediction problem, we need to learn a predictor that can produce a structured output given a structured input (e.g., part-of-speech tagging). The key learning and inference challenge is due to the exponential size of the structured output space. This paper makes four contributions towards the goal of a computationally-efficient inference and training approach for structured prediction that allows to employ complex models and to optimize for non-decomposable loss functions. First, we define a simple class of randomized greedy search (RGS) based inference procedures that leverage classification algorithms for simple outputs. Second, we develop a RGS specific learning approach for amortized inference that can quickly produce high-quality outputs for a given set of structured inputs. Third, we plug our amortized RGS inference solver inside the inner loop of parameter-learning algorithms (e.g., structured SVM) to improve the speed of training. Fourth, we perform extensive experiments on diverse structured prediction tasks. Results show that our proposed approach is competitive or better than many state-of-the-art approaches in spite of its simplicity. Chao Ma 0001, F. A. Rezaur Rahman Chowdhury, Aryan Deshwal, Md. Rakibul Islam 0001, Janardhan Rao Doppa, Dan Roth 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Joint Neural Entity Disambiguation with Output Space SearchabstractIn this paper, we present a novel model for entity disambiguation that combines both local contextual information and global evidences through Limited Discrepancy Search (LDS). Given an input document, we start from a complete solution constructed by a local model and conduct a search in the space of possible corrections to improve the local solution from a global view point. Our search utilizes a heuristic function to focus more on the least confident local decisions and a pruning function to score the global solutions based on their local fitness and the global coherences among the predicted entities. Experimental results on CoNLL 2003 and TAC 2010 benchmarks verify the effectiveness of our model. Hamed Shahbazi, Xiaoli Z. Fern, Reza Ghaeini, Chao Ma 0001, Rasha Obeidat, Prasad Tadepalli |
COLING | 4 |
| 2017 | Multi-Task Structured Prediction for Entity Analysis: Search-Based Learning AlgorithmsabstractEntity analysis in natural language processing involves solving multiple structured prediction problems such as mention detection, coreference resolution, and entity linking. We explore the space of search-based learning approaches to solve the problem of \em multi-task structured prediction (MTSP) in the context of entity analysis. In this paper, we study three different search architectures to solve MTSP problems that make different tradeoffs between speed and accuracy of training and inference. In all three architectures, we learn one or more scoring functions that employ both intra-task and inter-task features. In the “pipeline” architecture, which is the fastest, we solve different tasks one after another in a pipelined fashion. In the “joint” architecture, which is the most expensive, we formulate MTSP as a single-task structured prediction, and search the joint space of multi-task structured outputs. To improve the speed of joint architecture, we introduce two different pruning methods and associated learning techniques. In the intermediate “cyclic” architecture, we cycle through the tasks multiple times in sequence until there is no performance improvement. Results on two benchmark domains show that the joint architecture improves over the pipeline approach as well as the previous state-of-the-art approach based on graphical models. The cyclic architecture is faster than the joint approach and achieves competitive performance. Chao Ma 0001, Janardhan Rao Doppa, Prasad Tadepalli, Hamed Shahbazi, Xiaoli Z. Fern |
ACML | 1 |
| 2017 | Select-and-Evaluate: A Learning Framework for Large-Scale Knowledge Graph SearchabstractQuerying graph structured data is a fundamental operation that enables important applications including knowledge graph search, social network analysis, and cyber-network security. However, the growing size of real-world data graphs poses severe challenges for graph search to meet the response-time requirements of the applications. To address these scalability challenges, we develop a learning framework for graph search called \bf Sele\bf ct-and-Ev\bf aluat\bf e (SCALE). The key insight is to select a small part of the data graph that is sufficient to answer a given query in order to satisfy the specified constraints on time or accuracy. We formulate the problem of generating the candidate subgraph as a computational search process and induce search control knowledge from training queries using imitation learning. First, we define a search space over candidate selection plans, and identify target selection plans corresponding to the training queries by performing an expensive search. Subsequently, we learn greedy search control knowledge to imitate the search behavior of the target selection plans. Our experiments on large-scale knowledge graphs including DBpedia, YAGO, and Freebase show that using the learned selection plans, we can significantly improve the computational-efficiency of graph search to achieve high accuracy. F. A. Rezaur Rahman Chowdhury, Chao Ma 0001, Md. Rakibul Islam 0001, Mohammad Hossein Namaki, Mohammad Omar Faruk, Janardhan Rao Doppa |
ACML | 2 |
| 2015 | Learning Greedy Policies for the Easy-First FrameworkabstractEasy-first, a search-based structured prediction approach, has been applied to many NLP tasks including dependency parsing and coreference resolution. This approach employs a learned greedy policy (action scoring function) to make easy decisions first, which constrains the remaining decisions and makes them easier. We formulate greedy policy learning in the Easy-first approach as a novel non-convex optimization problem and solve it via an efficient Majorization Minimizatoin (MM) algorithm. Results on within-document coreference and cross-document joint entity and event coreference tasks demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves statistically significant performance improvement over existing training regimes for Easy-first and is less susceptible to overfitting. Chao Ma 0001, Janardhan Rao Doppa, Prashanth Mannem, Xiaoli Z. Fern, Thomas G. Dietterich, Prasad Tadepalli |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2014 | HC-Search for Multi-Label Prediction: An Empirical StudyabstractMulti-label learning concerns learning multiple, overlapping, and correlated classes. In this paper, we adapt a recent structured prediction framework called HC-Search for multi-label prediction problems. One of the main advantages of this framework is that its training is sensitive to the loss function, unlike the other multi-label approaches that either assume a specific loss function or require a manual adaptation to each loss function. We empirically evaluate our instantiation of the HC-Search framework along with many existing multi-label learning algorithms on a variety of benchmarks by employing diverse task loss functions. Our results demonstrate that the performance of existing algorithms tends to be very similar in most cases, and that the HC-Search approach is comparable and often better than all the other algorithms across different loss functions. Janardhan Rao Doppa, Chao Ma 0001, Alan Fern, Prasad Tadepalli |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2014 | Prune-and-Score: Learning for Greedy Coreference ResolutionabstractChao Ma, Janardhan Rao Doppa, J. Walker Orr, Prashanth Mannem, Xiaoli Fern, Tom Dietterich, Prasad Tadepalli. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2014. Chao Ma 0001, Janardhan Rao Doppa, John Walker Orr, Prashanth Mannem, Xiaoli Z. Fern, Thomas G. Dietterich, Prasad Tadepalli |
EMNLP | 1 |