Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Charny

dblp:79/2774 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 10 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
9 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 48% Routing and switching · 16% Transport protocols and congestion control · 15%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 61% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 35% Distributed systems · 4%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › quality of service
differentiated services
0.142003
Delay jitter bounds and packet scale rate guarantee expedited forwarding · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2002
Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for non-FIFO Nodes · INFOCOM 2002
Delay Jitter Bounds and Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for Expedited Forwarding · INFOCOM 2001
Internet architecture and protocols › packet scheduling
packet scale rate guarantee
0.132003
Packet scale rate guarantee for non-FIFO nodes · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2003
Delay jitter bounds and packet scale rate guarantee expedited forwarding · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2002
Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for non-FIFO Nodes · INFOCOM 2002
Internet architecture and protocols › quality of service › differentiated services
expedited forwarding
0.142003
Delay jitter bounds and packet scale rate guarantee expedited forwarding · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2002
Delay Jitter Bounds and Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for Expedited Forwarding · INFOCOM 2001
Packet scale rate guarantee for non-FIFO nodes · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2003
Routing and switching
multipath routing
0.112005
Walking the tightrope: responsive yet stable traffic engineering · SIGCOMM 2005
Routing and switching
traffic engineering
0.112005
Walking the tightrope: responsive yet stable traffic engineering · SIGCOMM 2005
Transport protocols and congestion control › rate control
rate-based congestion control
0.031996
Time scale analysis scalability issues for explicit rate allocation in ATM networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996
Scalability Issues for Distributed Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Time Scale Analysis of Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Internet architecture and protocols
quality of service
0.012003
Packet scale rate guarantee for non-FIFO nodes · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2003
Performance modeling and evaluation › delay analysis
delay bounds
0.012003
Packet scale rate guarantee for non-FIFO nodes · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2003
Performance modeling and evaluation › network performance analysis
network performance modeling
0.012003
Packet scale rate guarantee for non-FIFO nodes · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2003
Network performance modeling
network calculus
0.012002
Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for non-FIFO Nodes · INFOCOM 2002
Transport protocols and congestion control › rate control
explicit rate allocation
0.021996
Scalability Issues for Distributed Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Time Scale Analysis of Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Network optimization and economics › fairness
max-min fair rate allocation
0.021996
Time scale analysis scalability issues for explicit rate allocation in ATM networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996
Scalability Issues for Distributed Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.021996
Time scale analysis scalability issues for explicit rate allocation in ATM networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996
Scalability Issues for Distributed Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Network performance modeling › network calculus
service curve
0.012001
Delay Jitter Bounds and Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for Expedited Forwarding · INFOCOM 2001
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › switch architecture
crossbar switch
0.011999
On the speedup required for work-conserving crossbar switches · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network scheduling
switch scheduling
0.011999
On the speedup required for work-conserving crossbar switches · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999
Routing and switching › routing protocol
intra-domain routing
0.012005
Walking the tightrope: responsive yet stable traffic engineering · SIGCOMM 2005
Internet architecture and protocols
ATM networks
0.011996
Time Scale Analysis of Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Transport protocols and congestion control
congestion management
0.011996
Time Scale Analysis of Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks · INFOCOM 1996
Transport protocols and congestion control › rate control
explicit rate control
0.011996
Time scale analysis scalability issues for explicit rate allocation in ATM networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996
Internet architecture and protocols › quality of service › differentiated services
per-hop behavior
0.012002
Delay jitter bounds and packet scale rate guarantee expedited forwarding · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2002
Network performance modeling › network calculus
delay bounds
0.011999
On the speedup required for work-conserving crossbar switches · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
real-time traffic
0.011999
On the speedup required for work-conserving crossbar switches · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999
Distributed systems
convergence analysis
0.011996
Time scale analysis scalability issues for explicit rate allocation in ATM networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

min-max algebra · 0.1network calculus · 0.1queueing analysis · 0.1service curve analysis · 0.0distributed algorithm · 0.0discrete rate set · 0.0worst-case analysis · 0.0simulation · 0.0discrete source rates · 0.0convergence analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Performance Evaluation of Pre-Congestion Notification
abstract
Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) has been proposed at IETF as a framework for scalable measurement-based admission control (MBAC) for a DiffServ-capable network domain. PCN encompasses two functions: admission control of new flows and termination of admitted flows when the available capacity is unexpectedly reduced after a network failure. While there has been extensive research on MBAC, our goal is to understand practical limitations of the specific admission algorithms proposed for PCN and to understand the properties of the termination algorithms of which little is known from prior research.
Xinyang Zhang 0003, Anna Charny
IWQoS2
2005 Walking the tightrope: responsive yet stable traffic engineering
abstract
Current intra-domain Traffic Engineering (TE) relies on offline methods, which use long term average traffic demands. It cannot react to realtime traffic changes caused by BGP reroutes, diurnal traffic variations, attacks, or flash crowds. Further, current TE deals with network failures by pre-computing alternative routings for a limited set of failures. It may fail to prevent congestion when unanticipated or combination failures occur, even though the network has enough capacity to handle the failure.This paper presents TeXCP, an online distributed TE protocol that balances load in realtime, responding to actual traffic demands and failures. TeXCP uses multiple paths to deliver demands from an ingress to an egress router, adaptively moving traffic from over-utilized to under-utilized paths. These adaptations are carefully designed such that, though done independently by each edge router based on local information, they balance load in the whole network without oscillations. We model TeXCP, prove the stability of the model, and show that it is easy to implement. Our extensive simulations show that, for the same traffic demands, a network using TeXCP supports the same utilization and failure resilience as a network that uses traditional offline TE, but with half or third the capacity.
Srikanth Kandula, Dina Katabi, Bruce S. Davie, Anna Charny
SIGCOMM4
2003 Packet scale rate guarantee for non-FIFO nodes
abstract
Packet scale rate guarantee (PSRG) is a generic node model which underlies the definition of expedited forwarding (EF) proposed in the context of Internet differentiated services. For the case of first-in-first-out (FIFO) nodes, PSRG is equivalent to the well-understood concept of adaptive service curve. However, in practice, many devices do not necessarily preserve the FIFO property, and therefore, known FIFO results do not hold. This paper analyzes the properties of PSRG in the absence of FIFO assumption. Our analysis is based on a novel characterization of PSRG which avoids the use of virtual finish times and is obtained by min-max algebra. We use it to show that delay bounds previously obtained for the FIFO case are still valid; in contrast, we find that this is not true for the characterization of the concatenation of two nodes.
Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Anna Charny
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.2
2002 Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for non-FIFO Nodes
abstract
Packet scale rate guarantee (PSRG) is a generic node model which underlies the definition of expedited forwarding (EF) proposed in the context of Internet differentiated services (DiffServ). For the case of FIFO nodes, PSRG is equivalent to the well-understood concept of adaptive service curve. However, in practice, many devices do not necessarily preserve the FIFO property, and therefore known FIFO results do not hold. This paper analyzes the properties of PSRG in the absence of FIFO assumptions. Our analysis is based on a novel characterization of PSRG which avoids the use of virtual finish times; it is obtained by min-max algebra. We use it to show that delay bounds previously obtained for the FIFO case are still valid; in contrast, we find that this is not true for the characterization of the concatenation of two nodes.
Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Anna Charny
INFOCOM2
2002 Delay jitter bounds and packet scale rate guarantee expedited forwarding
abstract
We consider the definition of the expedited forwarding per-hop behavior (EF PHB) as given in RFC 2598 and its impact on worst case end-to-end delay jitter. On the one hand, the definition in RFC 2598 can be used to predict extremely low end-to-end delay jitter, independent of the network scale. On the other hand, the worst case delay jitter can be made arbitrarily large, while each flow traverses at most a specified number of hops, if we allow networks to become arbitrarily large; this is in contradiction with the previous statement. We analyze where the contradiction originates and find the explanation. It resides in the fact that the definition in RFC 2598 is not easily implementable in known schedulers, mainly because it is not formal enough and also because it does not contain an error term. We propose a new definition for the EF PHB, called "packet scale rate guarantee" (PSRG) that preserves the spirit of RFC 2598 while allowing a number of reasonable implementations and has very useful properties for per-node and end-to-end network engineering. We show that this definition implies a rate-latency service curve property. We also show that it is equivalent, in some sense, to the stronger concept of "adaptive service guarantee". Then we propose some proven bounds on delay jitter for networks implementing this new definition in cases without loss and with loss.
Jon C. R. Bennett, Kent Benson, Anna Charny, William F. Courtney, Jean-Yves Le Boudec
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.3
2001 Delay Jitter Bounds and Packet Scale Rate Guarantee for Expedited Forwarding
abstract
We consider the definition of the expedited forwarding per-hop behaviour (EF PHB) as given in RFC 2598 (Jacobsen et al. 1999), and its impact on worst case end-to-end delay jitter. On one hand, the definition in RFC 2598 can be used to predict extremely low end-to-end delay jitter, independent of the network scale. On the other hand, we find that the worst case delay jitter can be made arbitrarily large, while each flow traverses at most a specified number of hops, if we allow networks to become arbitrarily large; this is in contradiction with the previous statement. We analyze where the contradiction originates, and find the explanation. It resides in the fact that the definition in RFC 2598 is not easily implementable in schedulers we know of, mainly because it is not formal enough, and also because it does not contain an error term. We propose a new definition for the EF PHB, called "packet scale rate guarantee", which preserves the spirit of RFC 2598, while allowing a number of reasonable implementations, and has very useful properties for per-node and end-to-end network engineering. We show that this definition implies the rate-latency service curve guarantee. Then we propose some proven bounds on delay jitter for networks implementing this new definition, both in cases without loss and with loss.
Jon C. R. Bennett, Kent Benson, Anna Charny, William F. Courtney, Jean-Yves Le Boudec
INFOCOM3
1999 On the speedup required for work-conserving crossbar switches
abstract
This paper describes the architecture for a work-conserving server using a combined I/O-buffered crossbar switch. The switch employs a novel algorithm based on output occupancy, the lowest occupancy output first algorithm (LOOFA), and a speedup of only two. A work-conserving switch provides the same throughput performance as an output-buffered switch. The work-conserving property of the switch is independent of the switch size and input traffic pattern. We also present a suite of algorithms that can be used in combination with LOOFA. These algorithms determine the fairness and delay properties of the switch. We also describe a mechanism to provide delay bounds for real-time traffic using LOOFA. These delay bounds are achievable without requiring output-buffered switch emulation.
Pattabhiraman Krishna, Naimish S. Patel, Anna Charny, Robert J. Simcoe
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.3
1996 Time Scale Analysis of Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks
abstract
Rate based congestion management for computer communication networks has been the focus of considerable research. We examine some of the fundamental properties of such end-to-end rate based algorithms. The first is the requirement for a policy to ensure the feasibility of the transmission rates by the sources. The feasibility implies that the capacity of any of the resources is not exceeded at any time. We show that a source policy which defers increases in the explicit rate for a period of time, while allowing decreases to take effect immediately maintains the requirement of feasibility. We also examine the convergence properties of the end-to-end rate based schemes in general, and give an upper bound on the convergence time of the scheme presented.
Anna Charny, K. K. Ramakrishnan
INFOCOM1
1996 Scalability Issues for Distributed Explicit Rate Allocation in ATM Networks
abstract
One of the challenges for rate based congestion management for computer communication networks is that of scalability. This is true especially in the context of ATM, when reducing the amount of state maintained and the computation performed can have significant advantages in making switches fast as well as low-cost. We explore ways of achieving better scalability of explicit rate algorithms for maxmin fair rate allocation in the presence of a large number of flows/virtual connections. We seek ways to reduce the complexity in both the amount of state that individual switches have to maintain, and the computation performed, by introducing the idea of discrete source rates. We develop algorithms with O(k) complexity of the calculation of fair allocation at the switch, where k is the number of distinct rates. We reduce the amount of state information to one bit per flow without performance degradation. We suggest a further approximation requiring only O(k) state information which performs quite well in our simulations, although it is shown to be vulnerable to certain conditions which may lead to somewhat lower link utilization.
Anna Charny, K. K. Ramakrishnan, Anthony Lauck
INFOCOM1
1996 Time scale analysis scalability issues for explicit rate allocation in ATM networks
abstract
End-to-end rate based congestion management has been extensively studied for control of computer communication networks. We examine some of the properties of end-to-end rate based algorithms for congestion management using explicit rate feedback, to achieve maxmin fair rate allocation in the network. We formulate a requirement on a switch's local rate allocation computation sufficient to ensure convergence of the distributed algorithm to the global maxmin fair rate allocation. We provide an upper bound on the convergence time when the switch algorithm satisfies this requirement. We propose a requirement of feasibility of the transmission rates, maintaining which results in oscillation-free operation of the algorithm while maintaining small queues at the switches. Feasibility implies that the capacity of any of the resources is not exceeded at any time. We suggest a source policy to ensure feasibility of transmission rates, the essence of which is to delay a rate increase by a certain time, while decreasing the transmission rate immediately upon receiving the appropriate feedback. Finally, we seek ways of improving scalability of the computation of maxmin fair rates in the presence of a large number of flows. We suggest using a discrete set of rates, which as we show, reduces the computational complexity and the state requirement at the switches.
Anna Charny, K. K. Ramakrishnan, Anthony Lauck
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1