VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter J. Verveer
dblp:79/3120
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › model selection
classifier selection |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995 |
Data mining
dimensionality reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
intrinsic dimensionality estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
pattern classification |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
eigenvalue analysis · 0.0distance distribution estimation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality EstimatorsabstractThe intrinsic dimensionality of a data set may be useful for understanding the properties of classifiers applied to it and thereby for the selection of an optimal classifier. In this paper the authors compare the algorithms for two estimators of the intrinsic dimensionality of a given data set and extend their capabilities. One algorithm is based on the local eigenvalues of the covariance matrix in several small regions in the feature space. The other estimates the intrinsic dimensionality from the distribution of the distances from an arbitrary data vector to a selection of its neighbors. The characteristics of the two estimators are investigated and the results are compared. It is found that both can be applied successfully, but that they might fail in certain cases. The estimators are compared and illustrated using data generated from chromosome banding profiles.> Peter J. Verveer, Robert P. W. Duin |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |