Peter J. Verveer

dblp:79/3120 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › model selection
classifier selection
0.011995
An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995
Data mining
dimensionality reduction
0.011995
An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
intrinsic dimensionality estimation
0.011995
An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
pattern classification
0.011995
An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

eigenvalue analysis · 0.0distance distribution estimation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 An Evaluation of Intrinsic Dimensionality Estimators
abstract
The intrinsic dimensionality of a data set may be useful for understanding the properties of classifiers applied to it and thereby for the selection of an optimal classifier. In this paper the authors compare the algorithms for two estimators of the intrinsic dimensionality of a given data set and extend their capabilities. One algorithm is based on the local eigenvalues of the covariance matrix in several small regions in the feature space. The other estimates the intrinsic dimensionality from the distribution of the distances from an arbitrary data vector to a selection of its neighbors. The characteristics of the two estimators are investigated and the results are compared. It is found that both can be applied successfully, but that they might fail in certain cases. The estimators are compared and illustrated using data generated from chromosome banding profiles.>
Peter J. Verveer, Robert P. W. Duin
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1