Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark Debbage

dblp:79/331 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 56% Distributed systems · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
communication protocols
0.011995
An Interface to a Reliable Packet Delivery Service for Parallel Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1995
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models
message passing
0.011995
An Interface to a Reliable Packet Delivery Service for Parallel Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1995
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming environment
0.011995
An Interface to a Reliable Packet Delivery Service for Parallel Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1995
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Intel's Hyperscale-Ready Infrastructure Processing Unit (IPU)
abstract
Major Advantages of IPUs Separation of Infrastructure & Tenant Guest can fully control the CPU with their SW, while CSP maintains control of the infrastructure and Root of Trust Infrastructure Offload Accelerators help process these task efficiently. Minimize latency and jitter and maximize revenue from CPU Diskless Server Architecture Simplifies data center architecture while adding flexibility for the CSP
Brad Burres, Dan Daly, Mark Debbage, Eliel Louzoun, Christine Severns-Williams, Naru Sundar, Nadav Turbovich, Barry Wolford
HCS3
1995 An Interface to a Reliable Packet Delivery Service for Parallel Systems
abstract
Modern distributed memory parallel computers provide hardware support for the efficient and reliable delivery of interprocessor messages. This facility needs to be accessed by lightweight protocols that do not waste the performance of the underlying hardware; the heavyweight layering techniques traditionally used in distributed systems are wholly inappropriate. A low-level communication interface is therefore presented which exploits modern architectures effectively, while maintaining a good match to existing parallel programming environments. The interface defines mechanisms to access an asynchronous reliable packet delivery service. It permits messaging protocols to be efficiently synthesized by considering the activity at their end-points alone. This arrangement effectively decouples the implementation of protocols from low-level architectural features, and hence aids the portability of parallel programming environments. Furthermore, the interface allows the communication network to be shared by multiple programming paradigms, giving additional flexibility over existing systems.>
Mark Debbage, Mark Bowen Hill, Denis A. Nicole
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
1993 Global communications on locally connected message-passing parallel computers
abstract
Abstract Modern multicomputer components such as the inmos T800 and the Texas Instruments TMS320C40 provide hardware which supports efficient communication between directly connected processors. The paper describes techniques which have been developed to provide efficientglobalcommunications for machines based on these and similar processors. This service is implemented by a packet‐routing kernel adopting a standard, portable communications interface. The design of this kernel is discussed with particular emphasis on the manner in which it guarantees reliable, lightweight, deadlock‐free communication for arbitrary interconnection topologies. The kernel has been developed and tested on transputers. Extensive results on the performance of the router are presented to demonstrate that the substantial advantages associated with its well founded, structured design are not at odds with high efficiency. This router has been used to support several multi‐transputer environments, including a commercially available POSIX‐conformant operating system and a distributed occam environment freed from conventional configuration constraints.
Mark Debbage, Mark Bowen Hill, Denis A. Nicole
Concurr. Pract. Exp.1