Feedback-directed optimization (FDO) is effective in improving application runtime performance, but has not been widely adopted due to the tedious dual-compilation model, the difficulties in generating representative training data sets, and the high runtime overhead of profile collection. The use of hardware-event sampling overcomes these drawbacks by providing a lightweight approach to collect execution profiles in the production environment, which naturally consumes representative input. Yet, hardware event samples are typically not precise at the instruction or basic-block granularity. These inaccuracies lead to missed performance when compared to instrumentation-based FDO. In this paper, we use Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU)-based sampling to collect the instruction frequency profiles. By collecting profiles using multiple events, and applying heuristics to predict the accuracy, we improve the accuracy of the profile. We also show how emerging techniques can be used to further improve the accuracy of the sample-based profile. Additionally, these emerging techniques are used to collect value profiles, as well as to assist a lightweight interprocedural optimizer. All these profiles are represented in a portable form, thus they can be used across different platforms. We demonstrate that sampling-based FDO can achieve an average of 92 percent of the performance gains obtained using instrumentation-based exact profiles for both SPEC CINT2000 and CINT2006 benchmarks. The overhead of collection is only 0.93 percent on average, while compiler-based instrumentation incurs 2.0-351.5 percent overhead (and 10x overhead on an industrial web search application).

Performing analysis across module boundaries for an entire program is important for exploiting several runtime performance opportunities. However, due to scalability problems in existing full-program analysis frameworks, such performance opportunities are only realized by paying tremendous compile-time costs. Alternative solutions, such as partial compilations or user assertions, are complicated or unsafe and as a result, not many commercial applications are compiled today with cross-module optimizations. We present SYZYGY, a practical framework for performing efficient, scalable, interprocedural optimizations. The framework is implemented in the HP-UX Itanium/spl reg/ compilers and we have successfully compiled many very large applications consisting of millions of lines of code. We achieved performance improvements of up to 40% over optimization level two and compilation time improvements in the order of 100% and more compared to a previous approach.