Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James Fan
dblp:79/4382
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 22 · 6 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
12 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 43% Question answering and dialogue systems · 11% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.6 | 3 | 2016 | Building Joint Spaces for Relation Extraction · IJCAI 2016 Medical Relation Extraction with Manifold Models · ACL (1) 2014 Relation Extraction with Relation Topics · EMNLP 2011 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Poker-CNN: A Pattern Learning Strategy for Making Draws and Bets in Poker Games Using Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
pattern learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Poker-CNN: A Pattern Learning Strategy for Making Draws and Bets in Poker Games Using Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
self-play |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Poker-CNN: A Pattern Learning Strategy for Making Draws and Bets in Poker Games Using Convolutional Networks · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
unified embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Building Joint Spaces for Relation Extraction · IJCAI 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
biomedical relation extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Medical Relation Extraction with Manifold Models · ACL (1) 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
answer extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Leveraging Wikipedia Characteristics for Search and Candidate Generation in Question Answering · AAAI 2011 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
object proposal generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Leveraging Wikipedia Characteristics for Search and Candidate Generation in Question Answering · AAAI 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Using Syntactic and Semantic Structural Kernels for Classifying Definition Questions in Jeopardy! · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Automatic interpretation of loosely encoded input · Artif. Intell. 2009 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
learning by reading |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision-making |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Medical Relation Extraction with Manifold Models · ACL (1) 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question understanding |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Interpreting Loosely Encoded Questions · AAAI 2004 |
Information retrieval
query understanding |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Interpreting Loosely Encoded Questions · AAAI 2004 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | The Knowledge Required to Interpret Noun Compounds · IJCAI 2003 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering › knowledge integration
domain knowledge integration |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Utilizing Domain Knowledge in Neuroevolution · ICML 2003 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
neuroevolution |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Utilizing Domain Knowledge in Neuroevolution · ICML 2003 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › multiword expression
noun compound interpretation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | The Knowledge Required to Interpret Noun Compounds · IJCAI 2003 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Automatic interpretation of loosely encoded input · Artif. Intell. 2009 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
evolutionary computation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Utilizing Domain Knowledge in Neuroevolution · ICML 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-supervised learning · 0.4manifold learning · 0.4self-play · 0.2joint space learning · 0.2convolutional neural network · 0.2topic model · 0.1syntactic structural kernels · 0.1semantic structural kernels · 0.1search-based candidate generation · 0.1metadata extraction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Speech Sentiment Analysis via Pre-Trained Features from End-to-End ASR ModelsabstractIn this paper, we propose to use pre-trained features from end-to-end ASR models to solve speech sentiment analysis as a down-stream task. We show that end-to-end ASR features, which integrate both acoustic and text information from speech, achieve promising results. We use RNN with self-attention as the sentiment classifier, which also provides an easy visualization through attention weights to help interpret model predictions. We use well benchmarked IEMOCAP dataset and a new large-scale speech sentiment dataset SWBD-sentiment for evaluation. Our approach improves the-state-of-the-art accuracy on IEMOCAP from 66.6% to 71.7%, and achieves an accuracy of 70.10% on SWBD-sentiment with more than 49,500 utterances. Zhiyun Lu, Liangliang Cao, Yu Zhang 0033, Chung-Cheng Chiu, James Fan |
ICASSP | 5 |
| 2020 | A Large Scale Speech Sentiment CorpusabstractWe present a multimodal corpus for sentiment analysis based on the existing Switchboard-1 Telephone Speech Corpus released by the Linguistic Data Consortium. This corpus extends the Switchboard-1 Telephone Speech Corpus by adding sentiment labels from 3 different human annotators for every transcript segment. Each sentiment label can be one of three options: positive, negative, and neutral. Annotators are recruited using Google Cloud’s data labeling service and the labeling task was conducted over the internet. The corpus contains a total of 49500 labeled speech segments covering 140 hours of audio. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest multimodal Corpus for sentiment analysis that includes both speech and text features. Zhiyun Lu, Liangliang Cao, Yu Zhang 0033, James Fan |
LREC | 6 |
| 2016 | Poker-CNN: A Pattern Learning Strategy for Making Draws and Bets in Poker Games Using Convolutional NetworksabstractPoker is a family of card games that includes many varia- tions. We hypothesize that most poker games can be solved as a pattern matching problem, and propose creating a strong poker playing system based on a unified poker representa- tion. Our poker player learns through iterative self-play, and improves its understanding of the game by training on the results of its previous actions without sophisticated domain knowledge. We evaluate our system on three poker games: single player video poker, two-player Limit Texas Hold’em, and finally two-player 2-7 triple draw poker. We show that our model can quickly learn patterns in these very different poker games while it improves from zero knowledge to a competi- tive player against human experts. The contributions of this paper include: (1) a novel represen- tation for poker games, extendable to different poker vari- ations, (2) a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based learning model that can effectively learn the patterns in three different games, and (3) a self-trained system that signif- icantly beats the heuristic-based program on which it is trained, and our system is competitive against human expert players. Nikolai Yakovenko, Liangliang Cao, Colin Raffel, James Fan |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2016 | Building Joint Spaces for Relation Extraction
Chang Wang 0001, Liangliang Cao, James Fan |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2014 | Medical Relation Extraction with Manifold ModelsabstractIn this paper, we present a manifold model for medical relation extraction.Our model is built upon a medical corpus containing 80M sentences (11 gigabyte text) and designed to accurately and efficiently detect the key medical relations that can facilitate clinical decision making.Our approach integrates domain specific parsing and typing systems, and can utilize labeled as well as unlabeled examples.To provide users with more flexibility, we also take label weight into consideration.Effectiveness of our model is demonstrated both theoretically with a proof to show that the solution is a closed-form solution and experimentally with positive results in experiments. Chang Wang 0001, James Fan |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2013 | Analysis of Watson's Strategies for Playing Jeopardy!abstractMajor advances in Question Answering technology were needed for IBM Watson to play Jeopardy! at championship level -- the show requires rapid-fire answers to challenging natural language questions, broad general knowledge, high precision, and accurate confidence estimates. In addition, Jeopardy! features four types of decision making carrying great strategic importance: (1) Daily Double wagering; (2) Final Jeopardy wagering; (3) selecting the next square when in control of the board; (4) deciding whether to attempt to answer, i.e., "buzz in." Using sophisticated strategies for these decisions, that properly account for the game state and future event probabilities, can significantly boost a player's overall chances to win, when compared with simple "rule of thumb" strategies. This article presents our approach to developing Watson's game-playing strategies, comprising development of a faithful simulation model, and then using learning and Monte-Carlo methods within the simulator to optimize Watson's strategic decision-making. After giving a detailed description of each of our game-strategy algorithms, we then focus in particular on validating the accuracy of the simulator's predictions, and documenting performance improvements using our methods. Quantitative performance benefits are shown with respect to both simple heuristic strategies, and actual human contestant performance in historical episodes. We further extend our analysis of human play to derive a number of valuable and counterintuitive examples illustrating how human contestants may improve their performance on the show. Gerald Tesauro, David Gondek, Jonathan Lenchner, James Fan, John M. Prager |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 4 |
| 2012 | Learning to rank for robust question answeringabstractThis paper aims to solve the problem of improving the ranking of answer candidates for factoid based questions in a state-of-the-art Question Answering system. We first provide an extensive comparison of 5 ranking algorithms on two datasets -- from the Jeopardy quiz show and a medical domain. We then show the effectiveness of a cascading approach, where the ranking produced by one ranker is used as input to the next stage. The cascading approach shows sizeable gains on both datasets. We finally evaluate several rank aggregation techniques to combine these algorithms, and find that Supervised Kemeny aggregation is a robust technique that always beats the baseline ranking approach used by Watson for the Jeopardy competition. We further corroborate our results on TREC Question Answering datasets. Arvind Agarwal, Hema Raghavan, Karthik Subbian, Prem Melville, Richard D. Lawrence, David Gondek, James Fan |
CIKM | 7 |
| 2012 | When Did that Happen? - Linking Events and Relations to Timestamps
Dirk Hovy, James Fan, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Siddharth Patwardhan, Christopher A. Welty |
EACL | 2 |
| 2012 | Natural Language Processing in Watson
Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Aditya Kalyanpur, James Fan |
HLT-NAACL | 3 |
| 2012 | A Comparison of Hard Filters and Soft Evidence for Answer Typing in Watson
Christopher A. Welty, J. William Murdock, Aditya Kalyanpur, James Fan |
ISWC (2) | 4 |
| 2011 | Leveraging Wikipedia Characteristics for Search and Candidate Generation in Question AnsweringabstractMost existing Question Answering (QA) systems adopt a type-and-generate approach to candidate generation that relies on a pre-defined domain ontology. This paper describes a type independent search and candidate generation paradigm for QA that leverages Wikipedia characteristics. This approach is particularly useful for adapting QA systems to domains where reliable answer type identification and type-based answer extraction are not available. We present a three-pronged search approach motivated by relations an answer-justifying title-oriented document may have with the question/answer pair. We further show how Wikipedia metadata such as anchor texts and redirects can be utilized to effectively extract candidate answers from search results without a type ontology. Our experimental results show that our strategies obtained high binary recall in both search and candidate generation on TREC questions, a domain that has mature answer type extraction technology, as well as on Jeopardy! questions, a domain without such technology. Our high-recall search and candidate generation approach has also led to high overall QA performance in Watson, our end-to-end system. Jennifer Chu-Carroll, James Fan |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2011 | Statistical source expansion for question answeringabstractA source expansion algorithm automatically extends a given text corpus with related content from large external sources such as the Web. The expanded corpus is not intended for human consumption but can be used in question answering (QA) and other information retrieval or extraction tasks to find more relevant information and supporting evidence. We propose an algorithm that extends a corpus of seed documents with web content, using a statistical model to select text passages that are both relevant to the topics of the seeds and complement existing information. Nico Schlaefer, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, Eric Nyberg, James Fan, Wlodek Zadrozny, David A. Ferrucci |
CIKM | 4 |
| 2011 | Using Syntactic and Semantic Structural Kernels for Classifying Definition Questions in Jeopardy!
Alessandro Moschitti, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, Siddharth Patwardhan, James Fan, Giuseppe Riccardi |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2011 | Relation Extraction with Relation Topics
Chang Wang 0001, James Fan, Aditya Kalyanpur, David Gondek |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2011 | Leveraging Community-Built Knowledge for Type Coercion in Question Answering
Aditya Kalyanpur, J. William Murdock, James Fan, Christopher A. Welty |
ISWC (2) | 3 |
| 2009 | Automatic interpretation of loosely encoded input
James Fan, Ken Barker 0002, Bruce W. Porter |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2007 | Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned
Ken Barker 0002, Bhalchandra Agashe, Shaw Yi Chaw, James Fan, Noah S. Friedland, Michael R. Glass, Jerry R. Hobbs, Eduard H. Hovy, David J. Israel, Doo Soon Kim, Rutu Mulkar-Mehta, Sourabh Patwardhan, Bruce W. Porter, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2007 | Capturing and answering questions posed to a knowledge-based systemabstractAs part of the ongoing project, Project Halo, our goal is to build a system capable of answering questions posed by novice users to a formal knowledge base. In our current context, the knowledge base covers selected topics in physics, chemistry, and biology, and our question set consists of AP (advanced high-school) level examination questions. The task is challenging because the questions are linguistically complex and are often incomplete (assume unstated knowledge), and because the users do not have prior knowledge of the system's contents. Our solution involves two parts: a controlled language interface, in which users reformulate the original natural language questions in a simplified version of English, and a novel problem solver that can elaborate initially inadequate logical interpretations of a question by selecting relevant pieces of knowledge in the knowledge base. An evaluation of the work in 2006 showed that this approach is feasible and that complex, multisentence questions can be posed and answered, thus illustrating novel ways of dealing with the knowledge capture impedance between users and a formal knowledge base, while also revealing challenges that still remain. Peter Clark, Shaw Yi Chaw, Ken Barker 0002, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Philip Harrison, James Fan, Bonnie E. John, Bruce W. Porter, Aaron Spaulding, John A. Thompson, Peter Z. Yeh |
K-CAP | 6 |
| 2007 | Capturing a taxonomy of failures during automatic interpretation of questions posed in natural languageabstractAn important problem in artificial intelligence is capturing, from natural language, formal representationsallthat can be used by a reasoner to compute an answer. Many researchers have studied this problem by developing algorithms addressing specific phenomena in natural language interpretation, but few have studied (or cataloged) the types of failures associated with this problem. Knowledgeallof these failures can help researchers by providing a roadallmap of open research problems and help practitioners by providing a checklist of issues to address in order to build systems that can achieve good performance on this problem.allIn this paper, we present a study -- conducted in the context of the Halo Project -- cataloging the types of failures that occur when capturing knowledge from naturallanguage. We identified the categories of failures by examining a corpus of questions posed byallnaive usersallto a knowledge based question answering system and empirically demonstrated the generality of ourallcategorizations. We also describe available technologies that can address some of the failures we have identified. Peter Z. Yeh, Shaw Yi Chaw, James Fan, Dan Tecuci |
K-CAP | 3 |
| 2005 | Indirect anaphora resolution as semantic path searchabstractAnaphora occur commonly in natural language text, and resolving them is essential for capturing the knowledge encoded in text. Indirect anaphora are especially challenging to resolve because the referring expression and the antecedent are related by unstated background knowledge. Such anaphora need to be resolved properly in order to automatically capture the knowledge expressed in natural language. Resolving indirect anaphora has been treated as a unique problem that requires special-purpose methods, and these methods have had limited success in precision and recall. In this study, we used a generic tool for finding semantic paths between two concepts to resolve these anaphora, and it achieved approximately twice the recall of the best previous system without loss of precision. A series of ablation study showed that the biggest increase in recall came from an abductive stopping criterion of the search. James Fan, Ken Barker 0002, Bruce W. Porter |
K-CAP | 1 |
| 2004 | Interpreting Loosely Encoded Questions
James Fan, Bruce W. Porter |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2004 | A Question-Answering System for AP Chemistry: Assessing KR&R Technologies
Ken Barker 0002, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Shaw Yi Chaw, Peter Clark, James Fan, David J. Israel, Sunil Mishra, Bruce W. Porter, Pedro Romero, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh |
KR | 5 |
| 2003 | Utilizing Domain Knowledge in Neuroevolution
James Fan, Raymond Y. K. Lau, Risto Miikkulainen |
ICML | 1 |
| 2003 | The Knowledge Required to Interpret Noun Compounds
James Fan, Ken Barker 0002, Bruce W. Porter |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2001 | Representing roles and purposeabstractOntology designers often distinguish Entities (things that are) from Events (things that happen). It is not obvious how this division admits Roles (things that are, but only in the context of things that happen). For example, Person might be considered an Entity, while Employee is a Role. A Person remains a Person independent of the Events in which he participates. Someone is an Employee only by virtue of participating in an Employment Event. The problem of how to represent Roles is not new, but there is little consensus on a solution. In this paper, we present an ontology that finds a place for Roles as well as a representation that allows Roles to be related to Entities and Events to express the teleological notion of purpose. James Fan, Ken Barker 0002, Bruce W. Porter, Peter Clark |
K-CAP | 1 |