Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David J. Bakewell
dblp:79/6317
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signals · Bioinform. 2012 Weighted analysis of microarray gene expression using maximum-likelihood · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
likelihood ratio test |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signals · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signals · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Weighted analysis of microarray gene expression using maximum-likelihood · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic inference
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Weighted analysis of microarray gene expression using maximum-likelihood · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Weighted analysis of microarray gene expression using maximum-likelihood · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Weighted analysis of microarray gene expression using maximum-likelihood · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signals · Bioinform. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monte carlo simulation · 0.2hierarchical model · 0.2likelihood ratio test · 0.1bartlett correction · 0.1maximum likelihood estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Borrowing strength: a likelihood ratio test for related sparse signalsabstractMOTIVATION: Cancer biology is a field where the complexity of the phenomena battles against the availability of data. Often only a few observations per signal source, i.e. genes, are available. Such scenarios are becoming increasingly more relevant as modern sensing technologies generally have no trouble in measuring lots of channels, but where the number of subjects, such as patients or samples, is limited. In statistics, this problem falls under the heading 'large p, small n'. Moreover, in such situations the use of asymptotic analytical results should generally be mistrusted. RESULTS: We consider two cancer datasets, with the aim to mine the activity of functional groups of genes. We propose a hierarchical model with two layers in which the individual signals share a common variance component. A likelihood ratio test is defined for the difference between two collections of corresponding signals. The small number of observations requires a careful consideration of the bias of the statistic, which is corrected through an explicit Bartlett correction. The test is validated on Monte Carlo simulations, which show improved detection of differences compared with other methods. In a leukaemia study and a cancerous fibroblast cell line, we find that the method also works better in practice, i.e. it gives a richer picture of the underlying biology. AVAILABILITY: The MATLAB code is available from the authors or on http://www.math.rug.nl/stat/Software. CONTACT: [email protected] [email protected]. Ernst Wit, David J. Bakewell |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2005 | Weighted analysis of microarray gene expression using maximum-likelihoodabstractMOTIVATION: The numerical values of gene expression measured using microarrays are usually presented to the biological end-user as summary statistics of spot pixel data, such as the spot mean, median and mode. Much of the subsequent data analysis reported in the literature, however, uses only one of these spot statistics. This results in sub-optimal estimates of gene expression levels and a need for improvement in quantitative spot variation surveillance. RESULTS: This paper develops a maximum-likelihood method for estimating gene expression using spot mean, variance and pixel number values available from typical microarray scanners. It employs a hierarchical model of variation between and within microarray spots. The hierarchical maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) is shown to be a more efficient estimator of the mean than the 'conventional' estimate using solely the spot mean values (i.e. without spot variance data). Furthermore, under the assumptions of our model, the spot mean and spot variance are shown to be sufficient statistics that do not require the use of all pixel data. The hierarchical MLE method is applied to data from both Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and a two-channel dye-swapped spotted microarray experiment. The MC simulations show that the hierarchical MLE method leads to improved detection of differential gene expression particularly when 'outlier' spots are present on the arrays. Compared with the conventional method, the MLE method applied to data from the microarray experiment leads to an increase in the number of differentially expressed genes detected for low cut-off P-values of interest. David J. Bakewell, Ernst Wit |
Bioinform. | 1 |