Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John J. Zasio
dblp:79/795
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 91% Performance modeling and evaluation · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware simulation
compiled simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | SSIM: A Software Levelized Compiled-Code Simulator · DAC 1987 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | SSIM: A Software Levelized Compiled-Code Simulator · DAC 1987 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
logic simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | SSIM: A Software Levelized Compiled-Code Simulator · DAC 1987 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | SSIM: A Software Levelized Compiled-Code Simulator · DAC 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
levelized compiled code · 0.0interpreted code · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | SSIM: A Software Levelized Compiled-Code SimulatorabstractThis paper presents a new logic simulation technique that uses software levelized compiled-code (LCC) for synchronous designs. Three approaches are proposed: C source code, target machine code and interpreted code. The evaluation speed for the software LCC simulator (SSIM) is about 140,000 (gate) evaluations per second using C source code or target machine code, or 50,000 evaluations per second using interpreted code. It is about 40 to 100 times slower than the AIDA hardware LCC simulator, but is about one order of magnitude faster than a traditional software event simulator. For a 32-bit multiplier with gate activity more than 100%, experiments indicate that SSIM runs about 250 to 1,000 times faster than the AIDA event simulator that evaluates about 4,500 gates per second. L.-T. Wang, Nathan E. Hoover, Edwin H. Porter, John J. Zasio |
DAC | 4 |