Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Lux

dblp:80/10718 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-5188-1176ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cytometry data analysis
automated gating
0.312018
flowLearn: fast and precise identification and quality checking of cell populations in flow cytometry · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cell population identification
0.312018
flowLearn: fast and precise identification and quality checking of cell populations in flow cytometry · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cytometry data analysis
0.312018
flowLearn: fast and precise identification and quality checking of cell populations in flow cytometry · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 0.3density alignment · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 flowLearn: fast and precise identification and quality checking of cell populations in flow cytometry
abstract
Motivation: Identification of cell populations in flow cytometry is a critical part of the analysis and lays the groundwork for many applications and research discovery. The current paradigm of manual analysis is time consuming and subjective. A common goal of users is to replace manual analysis with automated methods that replicate their results. Supervised tools provide the best performance in such a use case, however they require fine parameterization to obtain the best results. Hence, there is a strong need for methods that are fast to setup, accurate and interpretable. Results: flowLearn is a semi-supervised approach for the quality-checked identification of cell populations. Using a very small number of manually gated samples, through density alignments it is able to predict gates on other samples with high accuracy and speed. On two state-of-the-art datasets, our tool achieves median(F1)-measures exceeding 0.99 for 31%, and 0.90 for 80% of all analyzed populations. Furthermore, users can directly interpret and adjust automated gates on new sample files to iteratively improve the initial training. Availability and implementation: FlowLearn is available as an R package on https://github.com/mlux86/flowLearn. Evaluation data is publicly available online. Details can be found in the Supplementary Material. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Markus Lux, Ryan Remy Brinkman, Cédric Chauve, Adam Laing, Anna Lorenc, Lucie Abeler-Dörner, Barbara Hammer
Bioinform.1
2016 acdc - Automated Contamination Detection and Confidence estimation for single-cell genome data
abstract
BACKGROUND: A major obstacle in single-cell sequencing is sample contamination with foreign DNA. To guarantee clean genome assemblies and to prevent the introduction of contamination into public databases, considerable quality control efforts are put into post-sequencing analysis. Contamination screening generally relies on reference-based methods such as database alignment or marker gene search, which limits the set of detectable contaminants to organisms with closely related reference species. As genomic coverage in the tree of life is highly fragmented, there is an urgent need for a reference-free methodology for contaminant identification in sequence data. RESULTS: We present acdc, a tool specifically developed to aid the quality control process of genomic sequence data. By combining supervised and unsupervised methods, it reliably detects both known and de novo contaminants. First, 16S rRNA gene prediction and the inclusion of ultrafast exact alignment techniques allow sequence classification using existing knowledge from databases. Second, reference-free inspection is enabled by the use of state-of-the-art machine learning techniques that include fast, non-linear dimensionality reduction of oligonucleotide signatures and subsequent clustering algorithms that automatically estimate the number of clusters. The latter also enables the removal of any contaminant, yielding a clean sample. Furthermore, given the data complexity and the ill-posedness of clustering, acdc employs bootstrapping techniques to provide statistically profound confidence values. Tested on a large number of samples from diverse sequencing projects, our software is able to quickly and accurately identify contamination. Results are displayed in an interactive user interface. Acdc can be run from the web as well as a dedicated command line application, which allows easy integration into large sequencing project analysis workflows. CONCLUSIONS: Acdc can reliably detect contamination in single-cell genome data. In addition to database-driven detection, it complements existing tools by its unsupervised techniques, which allow for the detection of de novo contaminants. Our contribution has the potential to drastically reduce the amount of resources put into these processes, particularly in the context of limited availability of reference species. As single-cell genome data continues to grow rapidly, acdc adds to the toolkit of crucial quality assurance tools.
Markus Lux, Jan Krüger, Christian Rinke, Irena Maus, Andreas Schlüter, Tanja Woyke, Alexander Sczyrba, Barbara Hammer
BMC Bioinform.1
2015 Automatic discovery of metagenomic structure
abstract
Binning constitutes a crucial step of de novo metagenomics data analysis, and several promising attempts to partially automate this process have been proposed; quite a few recent approaches rely on machine learning techniques, in particular clustering. However, so far, there does not exist a fully automated process, nor a thorough evaluation of its accuracy and robustness with respect to parameterisation. This contribution addresses the following issues: (i) an integration of modern dimensionality reduction and clustering techniques suitable for high dimensional data, and an automated selection of the number of clusters, (ii) a formal quantitative evaluation of the pipeline in benchmarks, (iii) and an evaluation of an optimum parameter choice, resulting in a complete automation of the process.
Markus Lux, Alexander Sczyrba, Barbara Hammer
IJCNN1
2011 An Online Platform for Visualizing Lexical Networks
abstract
This demo paper outlines www.linguistic-networks.net -- an online platform for displaying and browsing linguistic networks as resources in text and web mining. The paper focuses on the main features of this platform, including the visualization of time series of co-occurrence patterns, and features its underlying technology.
Markus Lux, Jan Laußmann, Alexander Mehler, Christian Menßen
Web Intelligence1