VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xianfeng Wu
dblp:80/1236
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4739-3994ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
3D vision · 22% Vision and language · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Model Reveals What to Cache: Profiling-Based Feature Reuse for Video Diffusion Models · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Model Reveals What to Cache: Profiling-Based Feature Reuse for Video Diffusion Models · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
video diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Model Reveals What to Cache: Profiling-Based Feature Reuse for Video Diffusion Models · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud processing
point cloud completion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FSC: Few-Point Shape Completion · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FSC: Few-Point Shape Completion · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud analysis › point cloud learning
point cloud feature learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | FSC: Few-Point Shape Completion · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual attention refinement · 0.9profiling-based feature reuse · 0.9paired positive and negative data construction · 0.9content guided refinement · 0.9two-stage refinement · 0.8saliency branch · 0.8dual-branch feature extractor · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering IncorrectlyabstractMultimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have displayed remarkable performance in multi-modal tasks, particularly in visual comprehension. However, we reveal that MLLMs often generate incorrect answers even when they understand the visual content. To this end, we manually construct a benchmark with 12 categories and design evaluation metrics that assess the degree of error in MLLM responses even when the visual content is seemingly understood. Based on this benchmark, we test 15 leading MLLMs and analyze the distribution of attention maps and logits of some MLLMs. Our investigation identifies two primary issues: 1) most instruction tuning datasets predominantly feature questions that "directly" relate to the visual content, leading to a bias in MLLMs’ responses to other indirect questions, and 2) MLLMs’ attention to visual tokens is notably lower than to system and question tokens. We further observe that attention scores between questions and visual tokens as well as the model’s confidence in the answers are lower in response to misleading questions than to straightforward ones. To address the first challenge, we introduce a paired positive and negative data construction pipeline to diversify the dataset. For the second challenge, we propose to enhance the model’s focus on visual content during decoding by refining the text and visual prompt. For the text prompt, we propose a content guided refinement strategy that performs preliminary visual content analysis to generate structured information before answering the question. Additionally, we employ a visual attention refinement strategy that highlights question-relevant visual tokens to increase the model’s attention to visual content that aligns with the question. Extensive experiments demonstrate that these challenges can be significantly mitigated with our proposed dataset and techniques. Yexin Liu, Zhengyang Liang, Yueze Wang, Xianfeng Wu, Muyang He, Jian Li 0062, Zheng Liu 0011, Harry Yang, Ser-Nam Lim, Bo Zhao 0015 |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2025 | Model Reveals What to Cache: Profiling-Based Feature Reuse for Video Diffusion Models
Xuran Ma, Yexin Liu, Yaofu Liu, Xianfeng Wu, Mingzhe Zheng, Ser-Nam Lim, Harry Yang |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2024 | FSC: Few-Point Shape CompletionabstractWhile previous studies have demonstrated successful 3D object shape completion with a sufficient number of points, they often fail in scenarios when a few points, e.g. tens of points, are observed. Surprisingly, via entropy analysis, we find that even a few points, e.g. 64 points, could retain substantial information to help recover the 3D shape of the object. To address the challenge of shape completion with very sparse point clouds, we then propose Few-point Shape Completion (FSC) model, which contains a novel dual-branch feature extractor for handling extremely sparse inputs, coupled with an extensive branch for maximal point utilization with a saliency branch for dynamic importance assignment. This model is further bolstered by a two-stage revision network that refines both the extracted features and the decoder output, enhancing the detail and authenticity of the completed point cloud. Our experiments demonstrate the feasibility of recovering 3D shapes from a few points. The proposed Few-point Shape Completion (FSC) model outperforms previous methods on both few-point inputs and many-point inputs, and shows good gener-alizability to different object categories. Code is available at https: https://github.com/xianzuwu/FSC. Xianzu Wu, Xianfeng Wu, Tianyu Luan, Yajing Bai, Zhongyuan Lai, Junsong Yuan 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |