VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
R. Qi
dblp:80/1601
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
optical mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
physical mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › DNA sequence analysis
restriction mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
single-molecule imaging · 0.0restriction endonuclease mapping · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | New approaches to genomic analysis using single moleculesabstractCurrent moIecuIar bioIogy techniques were deveIoped primarily for characterization of single genes, not entire genomes, and, as such, are not ideally suited to high resolution analysis of complex traits and the moiecular genetics of very large populations.Despite rapid progress in the human genome project effort, there is little doubt that radicaIIy new conceptual approaches are needed before routine whole genome-based analyses can be undertaken by both basic research and clinical laboratories.Physical mapping of genomes, using restriction endonucleases, has played a major role in the identification and characterizing various loci, for example, by aiding clone contig formation and by characterizing genetic lesions.Restriction maps provide precise genomic distances, unlike ordered sequencebased landmarks such as Sequence Tagged Sites (ST%), that are essential for optimizing the efficiency of sequencing efforts, and for determining the spatial relationships of specific loci.When compared to tedious hybridization-based fingerprinting approaches, ordered restriction maps offer relatively unambiguous clone characterization that is useful in contig formation, establishment of minimal tiling paths for sequencing, and preliminary characterization of sequence lesions.In addition, such maps provide a useful scaffold for sequence assembly, often critical in the final sequence finishing stage.Despite the broad applications of restriction maps, the associated techniques for their generation have changed little over the last ten years, primarily because they still utilize electrophoretic analysis.To help overcome these shortcomings, our laboratory developed the first practical non-electrophoretic genomic mapping approach, Optical Mapping, to meet this need.Optical Mapping is a single molecule methodology for the rapid production of ordered restriction David C. Schwartz, Thomas S. Anantharaman, C. Aston, Bud Mishra, V. Clarke, D. Gebauer, S. Delobette, E. Dimalanta, J. Edington, J. Evenzehav, J. Giacalone, C. Hiort, E. Huff, J. Jing, Z. Lai, B. Porter, R. Qi, Y. Skiadis |
RECOMB | 19 |