Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Gary D. Schultz

dblp:80/2079 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 75% Network measurement and analytics · 25%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 67% Storage systems · 33%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › protocol specification
formal description techniques
0.011980
Executable Description and Validation of SNA · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Internet architecture and protocols
network architecture specification
0.011980
Executable Description and Validation of SNA · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol specification
0.011980
Executable Description and Validation of SNA · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Network measurement and analytics
social network analysis
0.011980
Executable Description and Validation of SNA · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Storage systems
buffer management
0.011972
A Stochastic Model for Message Assembly Buffering with a Comparison of Block Assignment Strategies · J. ACM 1972
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011972
A Stochastic Model for Message Assembly Buffering with a Comparison of Block Assignment Strategies · J. ACM 1972
Performance modeling and evaluation
stochastic modeling
0.011972
A Stochastic Model for Message Assembly Buffering with a Comparison of Block Assignment Strategies · J. ACM 1972

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state-oriented description · 0.0meta-implementation · 0.0queueing theory · 0.0probability generating function · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 Executable Description and Validation of SNA
abstract
The definition of IBM's Systems Network Architecture (SNA) has evolved into a specification of a node in the form of a metaimplementation using formal, state-oriented descriptive techniques. This evolution is traced here, and the different formal techniques are described. The culmination of this process has been the development of a PL/I-based programming language, Format and Protocol Language (FAPL), as a descriptive tool. Using FAPL, the architects now define SNA by a programmed meta-implementation of a node. In this form, it is precise, readily accessible to the implementing product designers and programmers, and structurally close to the implementations. The essential features of the meta-implementation and of FAPL are described, along with the implications and advantages of describing the architecture in an executable form. One major benefit, already being realized, is the capability to test the logical consistency and completeness of the executable description itself. The current status of the validation of the executable description and sample results obtained are described.
Gary D. Schultz, David B. Rose, Colin H. West, James P. Gray
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1972 A Stochastic Model for Message Assembly Buffering with a Comparison of Block Assignment Strategies
abstract
A stochastic model is developed for the process of dynamic buffering for inbound messages in a computer communications system.For a specific characterization of message traffic, complementary viewpoints--one considering the process as a queueing system, the other considering it as a compound process--lead to the same probability generating function.Two buffer assignment schemes, both dynamic but differing in binding strategy, are compared in terms of optimal buffer size and total buffer pool requirements for a given overflow criterion.A simple model of optimal blocking, earlier proposed by Gaver and Lewis, is extended to cover both buffer strategies and also heterogeneous message sources.Finally, the derived characterization of total storage requirements is compared by numerical example with conservative and nonconservative asymptotic treatments of the process.
Gary D. Schultz
J. ACM1