Empathetic dialogue requires not only recognizing a user's emotional state but also making strategy-aware, context-sensitive decisions throughout response generation.However, the lack of a comprehensive empathy strategy framework, explicit task-aligned multi-stage reasoning, and high-quality strategy-aware data fundamentally limits existing approaches, preventing them from effectively modeling empathetic dialogue as a complex, multi-stage cognitive and decision-making process.To address these challenges, we propose STRIDE-ED, a STRategy-grounded, Interpretable, and DEep reasoning framework that models Empathetic Dialogue through structured, strategyconditioned reasoning.To support effective learning, we develop a strategy-aware data refinement pipeline integrating LLM-based annotation, multi-model consistency-weighted evaluation, and dynamic sampling to construct highquality training data aligned with empathetic strategies.Furthermore, we adopt a two-stage training paradigm that combines supervised fine-tuning with multi-objective reinforcement learning to better align model behaviors with target emotions, empathetic strategies, and response formats.Extensive experiments demonstrate that STRIDE-ED generalizes across diverse open-source LLMs and consistently outperforms existing methods on both automatic metrics and human evaluations.

Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation (MERC) focuses on detecting the emotions expressed by speakers in each utterance. Recent research has increasingly leveraged graph-based models to capture interactive relationships in conversations, enhancing the ability to extract emotional cues. However, existing methods primarily focus on explicit utterance-level relationships, neglecting both the implicit connections within individual modality and the differences in implicit relationships across modalities. Moreover, these methods often overlook the role of sentimental features in conversation history in cross-modal semantic alignment. To address these issues, we propose a novel model that employs modality-adaptive hybrid relational graphs to enrich the dialogue graph by inferring implicit relationships between nodes within each modality. Furthermore, we introduce historical sentiment through a progressive strategy that utilizes contrastive learning to refine cross-modal semantic alignment. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of our approach over state-of-the-art methods on the IEMOCAP and MELD datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/cgao-comp/HRG-SSA.

Abstract Task‐oriented dialogue system (TOD) is one kind of application of artificial intelligence (AI). The response generation module is a key component of TOD for replying to user's questions and concerns in sequential natural words. In the past few years, the works on response generation have attracted increasing research attention and have seen much progress. However, existing works ignore the fact that not each turn of dialogue history contributes to the dialogue response generation and give little consideration to the different weights of utterances in a dialogue history. In this article, we propose a hierarchical memory network mechanism with two steps to filter out unnecessary information of dialogue history. First, an utterance‐level memory network distributes various weights to each utterance (coarse‐grained). Second, a token‐level memory network assigns higher weights to keywords based on the former's output (fine‐grained). Furthermore, the output of the token‐level memory network will be employed to query the knowledge base (KB) to capture the dialogue‐related information. In the decoding stage, we take a gated‐mechanism to generate response word by word from dialogue history, vocabulary, or KB. Experiments show that the proposed model achieves superior results compared with state‐of‐the‐art models on several public datasets. Further analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method and the robustness of the model in the case of an incomplete training set.