VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qin Li 0007
dblp:80/43-7
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9210-8948ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 42% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 31% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | Langevin Monte Carlo: random coordinate descent and variance reduction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 Random Coordinate Langevin Monte Carlo · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | Langevin Monte Carlo: random coordinate descent and variance reduction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 Random Coordinate Langevin Monte Carlo · COLT 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
accelerated gradient methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating optimization over the space of probability measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
gradient-based optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating optimization over the space of probability measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Overparameterization of Deep ResNet: Zero Loss and Mean-field Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › statistical physics of learning
mean-field analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Overparameterization of Deep ResNet: Zero Loss and Mean-field Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Overparameterization of Deep ResNet: Zero Loss and Mean-field Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
overparameterized neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Overparameterization of Deep ResNet: Zero Loss and Mean-field Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Overparameterization of Deep ResNet: Zero Loss and Mean-field Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
bayesian sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Langevin Monte Carlo: random coordinate descent and variance reduction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Random Coordinate Langevin Monte Carlo · COLT 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › coordinate descent
stochastic coordinate descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Langevin Monte Carlo: random coordinate descent and variance reduction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Langevin Monte Carlo: random coordinate descent and variance reduction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Langevin Monte Carlo: random coordinate descent and variance reduction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Variance reduction for Random Coordinate Descent-Langevin Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
momentum methods · 1.7hamiltonian flow · 1.7variance reduction · 1.4langevin monte carlo · 1.4partial differential equation analysis · 0.6mean-field analysis · 0.6gradient descent · 0.6coordinate descent · 0.5convergence analysis · 0.5SAGA · 0.5random coordinate descent · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Accelerating optimization over the space of probability measuresabstractThe acceleration of gradient-based optimization methods is a subject of significant practical and theoretical importance, particularly within machine learning applications. While much attention has been directed towards optimizing within Euclidean space, the need to optimize over spaces of probability measures in machine learning motivates the exploration of accelerated gradient methods in this context, too. To this end, we introduce a Hamiltonian-flow approach analogous to momentum-based approaches in Euclidean space. We demonstrate that, in the continuous-time setting, algorithms based on this approach can achieve convergence rates of arbitrarily high order. We complement our findings with numerical examples. Shi Chen 0003, Qin Li 0007, Oliver Tse, Stephen J. Wright 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | High-Frequency Limit of the Inverse Scattering Problem: Asymptotic Convergence from Inverse Helmholtz to Inverse LiouvilleabstractAbstract. We investigate the asymptotic relation between the inverse problems relying on the Helmholtz equation and the radiative transfer equation (RTE) as physical models in the high-frequency limit. In particular, we evaluate the asymptotic convergence of a generalized version of the inverse scattering problem based on the Helmholtz equation, to the inverse scattering problem of the Liouville equation (a simplified version of RTE). The two inverse problems are connected through the Wigner transform that translates the wave-type description on the physical space to the kinetic-type description on the phase space, and the Husimi transform that models data localized both in location and direction. The finding suggests that impinging tightly concentrated monochromatic beams can indeed provide stable reconstruction of the medium, asymptotically in the high-frequency regime. This fact stands in contrast with the unstable reconstruction for the classical inverse scattering problem when the probing signals are plane waves. Shi Chen 0003, Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li 0007, Leonardo Zepeda-Núñez |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 3 |
| 2022 | Overparameterization of Deep ResNet: Zero Loss and Mean-field AnalysisabstractFinding parameters in a deep neural network (NN) that fit training data is a nonconvex optimization problem, but a basic first-order optimization method (gradient descent) finds a global optimizer with perfect fit (zero-loss) in many practical situations. We examine this phenomenon for the case of Residual Neural Networks (ResNet) with smooth activation functions in a limiting regime in which both the number of layers (depth) and the number of weights in each layer (width) go to infinity. First, we use a mean-field-limit argument to prove that the gradient descent for parameter training becomes a gradient flow for a probability distribution that is characterized by a partial differential equation (PDE) in the large-NN limit. Next, we show that under certain assumptions, the solution to the PDE converges in the training time to a zero-loss solution. Together, these results suggest that the training of the ResNet gives a near-zero loss if the ResNet is large enough. We give estimates of the depth and width needed to reduce the loss below a given threshold, with high probability. Zhiyan Ding, Shi Chen 0003, Qin Li 0007, Stephen J. Wright 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2021 | Random Coordinate Underdamped Langevin Monte CarloabstractThe Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo (ULMC) is a popular Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling method. It requires the computation of the full gradient of the log-density at each iteration, an expensive operation if the dimension of the problem is high. We propose a sampling method called Random Coordinate ULMC (RC-ULMC), which selects a single coordinate at each iteration to be updated and leaves the other coordinates untouched. We investigate the computational complexity of RC-ULMC and compare it with the classical ULMC for strongly log-concave probability distributions. We show that RC-ULMC is always cheaper than the classical ULMC, with a significant cost reduction when the problem is highly skewed and high dimensional. Our complexity bound for RC-ULMC is also tight in terms of dimension dependence. Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li 0007, Jianfeng Lu 0001, Stephen J. Wright 0001 |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2021 | Random Coordinate Langevin Monte CarloabstractLangevin Monte Carlo (LMC) is a popular Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling method. One drawback is that it requires the computation of the full gradient at each iteration, an expensive operation if the dimension of the problem is high. We propose a new sampling method: Random Coordinate LMC (RC-LMC). At each iteration, a single coordinate is randomly selected to be updated by a multiple of the partial derivative along this direction plus noise, while all other coordinates remain untouched. We investigate the total complexity of RC-LMC and compare it with the classical LMC for log-concave probability distributions. We show that when the gradient of the log-density is Lipschitz, RC-LMC is less expensive than the classical LMC if the log-density is highly skewed for high dimensional problems. Further, when both the gradient and the Hessian of the log-density are Lipschitz, RC-LMC is always cheaper than the classical LMC, by a factor proportional to the square root of the problem dimension. In the latter case, we use an example to demonstrate that our estimate of complexity is sharp with respect to the dimension. Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li 0007, Jianfeng Lu 0001, Stephen J. Wright 0001 |
COLT | 2 |
| 2021 | Langevin Monte Carlo: random coordinate descent and variance reductionabstractLangevin Monte Carlo (LMC) is a popular Bayesian sampling method. For the log-concave distribution function, the method converges exponentially fast, up to a controllable discretization error. However, the method requires the evaluation of a full gradient in each iteration, and for a problem on $\mathbb{R}^d$, this amounts to $d$ times partial derivative evaluations per iteration. The cost is high when $d\gg1$. In this paper, we investigate how to enhance computational efficiency through the application of RCD (random coordinate descent) on LMC. There are two sides of the theory: 1. By blindly applying RCD to LMC, one surrogates the full gradient by a randomly selected directional derivative per iteration. Although the cost is reduced per iteration, the total number of iteration is increased to achieve a preset error tolerance. Ultimately there is no computational gain; 2. We then incorporate variance reduction techniques, such as SAGA (stochastic average gradient) and SVRG (stochastic variance reduced gradient), into RCD-LMC. It will be proved that the cost is reduced compared with the classical LMC, and in the underdamped case, convergence is achieved with the same number of iterations, while each iteration requires merely one-directional derivative. This means we obtain the best possible computational cost in the underdamped-LMC framework. Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li 0007 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2020 | Variance reduction for Random Coordinate Descent-Langevin Monte CarloabstractSampling from a log-concave distribution function is one core problem that has wide applications in Bayesian statistics and machine learning. While most gradient free methods have slow convergence rate, the Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) that provides fast convergence requires the computation of gradients. In practice one uses finite-differencing approximations as surrogates, and the method is expensive in high-dimensions. A natural strategy to reduce computational cost in each iteration is to utilize random gradient approximations, such as random coordinate descent (RCD) or simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA).We show by a counterexamplethat blindly applying RCD does not achieve the goal in the most general setting. The high variance induced by the randomness means a larger number of iterations are needed, and this balances out the saving in each iteration. We then introduce a new variance reduction approach, termed Randomized Coordinates Averaging Descent (RCAD), and incorporate it with both overdamped and underdamped LMC. The methods are termed RCAD-O-LMC and RCAD-U-LMC respectively. The methods still sit in the random gradient approximation framework, and thus the computational cost in each iteration is low. However, by employing RCAD, the variance is reduced, so the methods converge within the same number of iterations as the classical overdamped and underdamped LMC. This leads to a computational saving overall. Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li 0007 |
NeurIPS | 2 |