Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Harry C. Heacox Jr.
dblp:80/4445
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Database system architecture and tuning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models |
0.0 | 1 | 1972 | Analysis of Two Time-Sharing Queueing Models · J. ACM 1972 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models › queueing discipline
round-robin scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1972 | Analysis of Two Time-Sharing Queueing Models · J. ACM 1972 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | An Experiment in Dedicated Data Management · VLDB 1975 |
Operating systems › resource management › process management
CPU scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1972 | Analysis of Two Time-Sharing Queueing Models · J. ACM 1972 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
queueing analysis · 0.0prototype implementation · 0.0performance measurement · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | An Experiment in Dedicated Data ManagementabstractThere is growing concern among users of data base management systems regarding the cost and performance of such systems. As is typical of highly complex, generalized software, data management systems can be expensive to run, particularly in terms of processing time. A possible solution to this problem is to offload the data management functions into an inexpensive, dedicated minicomputer, called a dedicated data management computer, or DDM. This "backend" approach to the problem has been investigated by Bell Telephone Laboratories [1], using a large DBTG-based system. Their results indicated that such an approach is feasible, though no performance figures have been published. In an effort to obtain more detailed data on the performance implications of a DDM system, two experiments were performed by the Sperry Corporate Research Center. The first experiment was designed to obtain estimates of the percentage of CP time which could be offloaded from the host to a DDM. The second experiment, a prototype implementation of a DDM configuration using a standard minicomputer, was designed to demonstrate the credibility of such a system. Harry C. Heacox Jr., E. S. Cosloy, J. B. Cohen |
VLDB | 1 |
| 1972 | Analysis of Two Time-Sharing Queueing ModelsabstractTWO time-sharing models are described.One is the conventional round-robin model in which each customer receives at most q seconds of service at a time.If this completes his service requirement, he leaves the system; otherwise he joins the end of the queue to await his next turn.The second model is a modification of the round-robin system in which the amount of service per pass depends on the rate at which programs arrive in the system.The models are analyzed under the assumption of constant, nonzero overhead when the processor swaps one program for another.Expressions are derived for the mean waiting time in queue as a function of service requirement and for the mean system cost due to waiting time in queue. Harry C. Heacox Jr., Paul Walton Purdom Jr. |
J. ACM | 1 |