T. Nathan Mundhenk

dblp:80/4952 · also Terrell Nathan Mundhenk · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3508-0341ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 32% Image recognition and object detection · 21% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation › inductive program synthesis
symbolic regression
1.122022
A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic Regression · NeurIPS 2022
Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Discovering symbolic policies with deep reinforcement learning · ICML 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
neural-guided search
0.512021
Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.512021
Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients · ICLR 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
symbolic regression
0.512021
Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients · ICLR 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.212016
A Large Contextual Dataset for Classification, Detection and Counting of Cars with Deep Learning · ECCV (3) 2016
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › category-specific object detection
vehicle detection
0.212016
A Large Contextual Dataset for Classification, Detection and Counting of Cars with Deep Learning · ECCV (3) 2016
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
brain-inspired computing
0.212016
Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications · SC 2016
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing
0.212016
Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications · SC 2016
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic hardware
0.212016
Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications · SC 2016
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.112021
Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112016
A Large Contextual Dataset for Classification, Detection and Counting of Cars with Deep Learning · ECCV (3) 2016
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object counting
0.112016
A Large Contextual Dataset for Classification, Detection and Counting of Cars with Deep Learning · ECCV (3) 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

genetic programming · 3.2deep reinforcement learning · 2.0recursive problem simplification · 1.7pre-training · 1.7neural-guided search · 1.7risk-seeking policy gradient · 1.0deep learning · 0.8autoregressive recurrent neural network · 0.5patch arrangement context learning · 0.3software ecosystem · 0.2scalable systems · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SRBench++: Principled Benchmarking of Symbolic Regression With Domain-Expert Interpretation
abstract
Symbolic regression searches for analytic expressions that accurately describe studied phenomena. The main promise of this approach is that it may return an interpretable model that can be insightful to users, while maintaining high accuracy. The current standard for benchmarking these algorithms is SRBench, which evaluates methods on hundreds of datasets that are a mix of real-world and simulated processes spanning multiple domains. At present, the ability of SRBench to evaluate interpretability is limited to measuring the size of expressions on real-world data, and the exactness of model forms on synthetic data. In practice, model size is only one of many factors used by subject experts to determine how interpretable a model truly is. Furthermore, SRBench does not characterize algorithm performance on specific, challenging sub-tasks of regression such as feature selection and evasion of local minima. In this work, we propose and evaluate an approach to benchmarking SR algorithms that addresses these limitations of SRBench by 1) incorporating expert evaluations of interpretability on a domain-specific task, and 2) evaluating algorithms over distinct properties of data science tasks. We evaluate 12 modern symbolic regression algorithms on these benchmarks and present an in-depth analysis of the results, discuss current challenges of symbolic regression algorithms and highlight possible improvements for the benchmark itself.
Fabrício Olivetti de França, Marco Virgolin, Michael Kommenda, Maimuna S. Majumder, Miles D. Cranmer, Guilherme Espada, Leon Ingelse, Alcides Fonseca, Mikel Landajuela, Brenden K. Petersen, Ruben Glatt, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Chak Shing Lee, Jacob D. Hochhalter, David L. Randall, P. Kamienny, Hengzhe Zhang, Grant Dick, Alessandro Simon, Bogdan Burlacu, Jaan Kasak, Meera Vieira Machado, Casper Wilstrup, William G. La Cava
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.12
2022 A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic Regression
abstract
The last few years have witnessed a surge in methods for symbolic regression, from advances in traditional evolutionary approaches to novel deep learning-based systems. Individual works typically focus on advancing the state-of-the-art for one particular class of solution strategies, and there have been few attempts to investigate the benefits of hybridizing or integrating multiple strategies. In this work, we identify five classes of symbolic regression solution strategies---recursive problem simplification, neural-guided search, large-scale pre-training, genetic programming, and linear models---and propose a strategy to hybridize them into a single modular, unified symbolic regression framework. Based on empirical evaluation using SRBench, a new community tool for benchmarking symbolic regression methods, our unified framework achieves state-of-the-art performance in its ability to (1) symbolically recover analytical expressions, (2) fit datasets with high accuracy, and (3) balance accuracy-complexity trade-offs, across 252 ground-truth and black-box benchmark problems, in both noiseless settings and across various noise levels. Finally, we provide practical use case-based guidance for constructing hybrid symbolic regression algorithms, supported by extensive, combinatorial ablation studies.
Mikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Ruben Glatt, Cláudio P. Santiago, Ignacio Aravena, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Garrett Mulcahy, Brenden K. Petersen
NeurIPS7
2021 Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients
Brenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio P. Santiago, Sookyung Kim, Joanne Taery Kim
ICLR3
2021 Discovering symbolic policies with deep reinforcement learning
abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has proven successful for many difficult control problems by learning policies represented by neural networks. However, the complexity of neural network-based policies{—}involving thousands of composed non-linear operators{—}can render them problematic to understand, trust, and deploy. In contrast, simple policies comprising short symbolic expressions can facilitate human understanding, while also being transparent and exhibiting predictable behavior. To this end, we propose deep symbolic policy, a novel approach to directly search the space of symbolic policies. We use an autoregressive recurrent neural network to generate control policies represented by tractable mathematical expressions, employing a risk-seeking policy gradient to maximize performance of the generated policies. To scale to environments with multi-dimensional action spaces, we propose an "anchoring" algorithm that distills pre-trained neural network-based policies into fully symbolic policies, one action dimension at a time. We also introduce two novel methods to improve exploration in DRL-based combinatorial optimization, building on ideas of entropy regularization and distribution initialization. Despite their dramatically reduced complexity, we demonstrate that discovered symbolic policies outperform seven state-of-the-art DRL algorithms in terms of average rank and average normalized episodic reward across eight benchmark environments.
Mikel Landajuela, Brenden K. Petersen, Sookyung Kim, Cláudio P. Santiago, Ruben Glatt, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Jacob F. Pettit, Daniel M. Faissol
ICML6
2021 Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding
abstract
Symbolic regression is the process of identifying mathematical expressions that fit observed output from a black-box process. It is a discrete optimization problem generally believed to be NP-hard. Prior approaches to solving the problem include neural-guided search (e.g. using reinforcement learning) and genetic programming. In this work, we introduce a hybrid neural-guided/genetic programming approach to symbolic regression and other combinatorial optimization problems. We propose a neural-guided component used to seed the starting population of a random restart genetic programming component, gradually learning better starting populations. On a number of common benchmark tasks to recover underlying expressions from a dataset, our method recovers 65% more expressions than a recently published top-performing model using the same experimental setup. We demonstrate that running many genetic programming generations without interdependence on the neural-guided component performs better for symbolic regression than alternative formulations where the two are more strongly coupled. Finally, we introduce a new set of 22 symbolic regression benchmark problems with increased difficulty over existing benchmarks. Source code is provided at www.github.com/brendenpetersen/deep-symbolic-optimization.
T. Nathan Mundhenk, Mikel Landajuela, Ruben Glatt, Cláudio P. Santiago, Daniel M. Faissol, Brenden K. Petersen
NeurIPS1
2018 Improvements to Context Based Self-Supervised Learning
abstract
We develop a set of methods to improve on the results of self-supervised learning using context. We start with a baseline of patch based arrangement context learning and go from there. Our methods address some overt problems such as chromatic aberration as well as other potential problems such as spatial skew and mid-level feature neglect. We prevent problems with testing generalization on common self-supervised benchmark tests by using different datasets during our development. The results of our methods combined yield top scores on all standard self-supervised benchmarks, including classification and detection on PASCAL VOC 2007, segmentation on PASCAL VOC 2012, and "linear tests" on the ImageNet and CSAIL Places datasets. We obtain an improvement over our baseline method of between 4.0 to 7.1 percentage points on transfer learning classification tests. We also show results on different standard network architectures to demonstrate generalization as well as portability. All data, models and programs are available at: https://gdo-datasci.llnl.gov/selfsupervised/.
T. Nathan Mundhenk, Daniel Ho, Barry Y. Chen
CVPR1
2017 Deep Multi-modal Vehicle Detection in Aerial ISR Imagery
abstract
Since the introduction of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), object detection in imagery has witnessed substantial breakthroughs in state-of-the-art performance. The defense community utilizes overhead image sensors that acquire large field-of-view aerial imagery in various bands of the electromagnetic spectrum, which is then exploited for various applications, including the detection and localization of man-made objects. In this work, we utilize a recent state-of-the art object detection algorithm, faster R-CNN, to train a deep CNN for vehicle detection in multimodal imagery. We utilize the vehicle detection in aerial imagery (VEDAI) dataset, which contains overhead imagery that is representative of an ISR setting. Our contribution includes modification of key parameters in the faster R-CNN algorithm for this setting where the objects of interest are spatially small, occupying less than 1:5×10-3 of the total image pixels. Our experiments show that (1) an appropriately trained deep CNN leads to average precision rates above 93% on vehicle detection, and (2) transfer learning between imagery modalities is possible, yielding average precision rates above 90% in the absence of fine-tuning.
Wesam A. Sakla, Goran Konjevod, T. Nathan Mundhenk
WACV3
2016 A Large Contextual Dataset for Classification, Detection and Counting of Cars with Deep Learning
T. Nathan Mundhenk, Goran Konjevod, Wesam A. Sakla, Kofi Boakye
ECCV (3)1
2016 Truenorth ecosystem for brain-inspired computing: scalable systems, software, and applications
abstract
Abstract not provided
Jun Sawada, Filipp Akopyan, Andrew S. Cassidy, Brian Taba, Michael DeBole, Pallab Datta, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, Arnon Amir, John V. Arthur, Alexander Andreopoulos, Rathinakumar Appuswamy, Heinz Baier, Davis Barch, David J. Berg, Carmelo di Nolfo, Steven K. Esser, Myron Flickner, Thomas A. Horvath, Bryan L. Jackson, Jeffrey A. Kusnitz, Scott Lekuch, Michael Mastro, Timothy Melano, Paul Merolla, Steven E. Millman, Tapan K. Nayak, Norm Pass, Hartmut Penner, William P. Risk, Kai Schleupen, Ben Shaw 0001, Hayley Wu, Brian Giera, Adam Moody, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Brian Van Essen, Eric X. Wang, David P. Widemann, William E. Murphy, Jamie K. Infantolino, James A. Ross, Dale R. Shires, Manuel M. Vindiola, Raju Namburu, Dharmendra S. Modha
SC35
2003 CINNIC, a new computational algorithm for the modeling of early visual contour integration in humans
T. Nathan Mundhenk, Laurent Itti
Neurocomputing1