Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roy L. Russo

dblp:80/5206 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Electronic design automation · 71% Integrated circuit design · 15% Parallel and multicore computing · 10%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.031972
On the Tradeoff Between Logic Performance and Circuit-to-Pin Ratio for LSI · IEEE Trans. Computers 1972
A Heuristic Procedure for the Partitioning and Mapping of Computer Logic Graphs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
On a Pin Versus Block Relationship For Partitions of Logic Graphs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.021972
On the Tradeoff Between Logic Performance and Circuit-to-Pin Ratio for LSI · IEEE Trans. Computers 1972
Synthesis of Error-Tolerant Counters Using Minimum Distance Three State Assignments · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965
Electronic design automation › physical design
circuit partitioning
0.011972
On the Tradeoff Between Logic Performance and Circuit-to-Pin Ratio for LSI · IEEE Trans. Computers 1972
Electronic design automation › physical design › circuit partitioning
logic partitioning
0.011971
On a Pin Versus Block Relationship For Partitions of Logic Graphs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Parallel and multicore computing
partitioning and mapping
0.011971
A Heuristic Procedure for the Partitioning and Mapping of Computer Logic Graphs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault-tolerant design
0.011965
Synthesis of Error-Tolerant Counters Using Minimum Distance Three State Assignments · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
state assignment
0.011965
Synthesis of Error-Tolerant Counters Using Minimum Distance Three State Assignments · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1965
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning
0.011974
An Example Computer Logic Graph and Its Partitions and Mappings · IEEE Trans. Computers 1974

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partitioning algorithm · 0.0mapping algorithms · 0.0mapping algorithm · 0.0encoding · 0.0heuristic procedure · 0.0controlled partitioning experiments · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 A Foreword to Knowledge and Data Engineering
Roy L. Russo
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
1974 An Example Computer Logic Graph and Its Partitions and Mappings
abstract
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide an example computer logic graph and data concerning various partitions and mappings of this graph. This information should be of particular interest to those workers who are developing partitioning and mapping algorithms, since it provides a means to test and compare alternative methods. It should also be of use to those interested in other algorithms (e.g., placement, diagramming, grouping, etc.) for logic graphs.
Angelo Mennone, Roy L. Russo
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1972 On the Tradeoff Between Logic Performance and Circuit-to-Pin Ratio for LSI
abstract
A key problem in the effective use of large-scale integration is the design and partitioning of computer logic to achieve sufficiently high circuit-to-pin ratios. In this paper a power-law relationship between pins and partitioned circuits is discussed and empirical evidence is presented that implies that the pin requirement is a sensitive function of the performance level of the logic. Two techniques for increasing the circuit-to-pin ratio are discussed. The first is to serialize the interchip transfer of information that results in a degradation in performance of the logic. The second is to encode the information to be transferred so that fewer pins are required but without reducing the performance. The results of experiments using the encoding principle to map a small logic graph onto chips are presented to obtain an indication of the effectiveness of this technique. It is shown that the relationship between circuits and pins when using encoding remains a power law.
Roy L. Russo
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1971 On a Pin Versus Block Relationship For Partitions of Logic Graphs
abstract
Partitions of the set of blocks of a computer logic graph, also called a block graph, into subsets called modules demonstrate that a two-region relationship exists between P, the average number of pins per module, and B, the average number of blocks per module. In the first region, P = KBr, where K is the average number of pins per block and 0.57 ≤ r ≤ 0.75. In the second region, that is, where the number of modules is small (i.e., 1-5), P is less than predicted by the above formula and is given by a more complex relationship. These conclusions resulted from controlled partitioning experiments performed using a computer program to partition four logic graphs varying in size from 500 to 13 000 circuits representing three different computers. The size of a block varied from one NOR circuit in one of the block graphs to a 30-circuit chip in one of the other block graphs.
Bernard S. Landman, Roy L. Russo
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1971 A Heuristic Procedure for the Partitioning and Mapping of Computer Logic Graphs
abstract
A heuristic procedure for partitioning or mapping a set of interconnected blocks into subsets called modules is presented. Each module may be constrained in terms of the number of blocks and/or the number of intermodule connections that it can accommodate. The procedure allows given blocks to be mapped to more than one module in order to reduce the number of modules required if such reduction is desirable. Results obtained from applying the procedure, by means of a computer program, to the partitioning and mapping of computer logic gates into chips and cards are presented.
Roy L. Russo, Peter H. Oden, Peter K. Wolff Sr.
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1965 Synthesis of Error-Tolerant Counters Using Minimum Distance Three State Assignments
abstract
It is shown that by using minimum distance three state assignments and considering error states when deriving the input equations, counters tolerant of a single error can be synthesized. Although one flip-flop in the counter might be in error, the other flip-flops will continue to sequence correctly. Thus acceptable sequencing continues with a malfunctioning unit present in the circuit. Because of the error correcting properties of the state assignment, the correct state of the counter can be recovered. A one-bit error introduced by noise or an intermittent malfunction will be automatically corrected. Failure occurs if more than one flip-flop is in error. Redundancy is incorporated as an inherent result of the initial design procedure rather than being included after a nonredundant working design is obtained. Instead of using any of the known methods of simplification of Boolean functions, the synthesis procedure involves the selection of a minimum number of terms which satisfy a concise set of distance and intersection properties. The selection procedure is intrinsically suitable for machine computation. Although specific logic units are discussed, it is believed that the concepts are general in nature and can be applied to any type of logic hardware.
Roy L. Russo
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput.1