Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rolf Daniel

dblp:80/7100 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-8646-7925ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics
0.322015
Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data · Bioinform. 2015
Treephyler: fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
taxonomic profiling
0.112010
Treephyler: fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
16S rRNA analysis
0.112015
Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.012010
Treephyler: fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic diversity analysis
0.012010
Treephyler: fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phylogenetic analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The characterization of phylogenetic and functional diversity is a key element in the analysis of microbial communities. Amplicon-based sequencing of marker genes, such as 16S rRNA, is a powerful tool for assessing and comparing the structure of microbial communities at a high phylogenetic resolution. Because 16S rRNA sequencing is more cost-effective than whole metagenome shotgun sequencing, marker gene analysis is frequently used for broad studies that involve a large number of different samples. However, in comparison to shotgun sequencing approaches, insights into the functional capabilities of the community get lost when restricting the analysis to taxonomic assignment of 16S rRNA data. RESULTS: Tax4Fun is a software package that predicts the functional capabilities of microbial communities based on 16S rRNA datasets. We evaluated Tax4Fun on a range of paired metagenome/16S rRNA datasets to assess its performance. Our results indicate that Tax4Fun provides a good approximation to functional profiles obtained from metagenomic shotgun sequencing approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Tax4Fun is an open-source R package and applicable to output as obtained from the SILVAngs web server or the application of QIIME with a SILVA database extension. Tax4Fun is freely available for download at http://tax4fun.gobics.de/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Kathrin Petra Aßhauer, Bernd Wemheuer, Rolf Daniel, Peter Meinicke
Bioinform.3
2010 Treephyler: fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes
abstract
SUMMARY: Assessment of phylogenetic diversity is a key element to the analysis of microbial communities. Tools are needed to handle next-generation sequencing data and to cope with the computational complexity of large-scale studies. Here, we present Treephyler, a tool for fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes. Treephyler was evaluated on real metagenome to assess its performance in comparison to previous approaches for taxonomic profiling. Results indicate that Treephyler is in terms of speed and accuracy prepared for next-generation sequencing techniques and large-scale analysis. AVAILABILITY: Treephyler is implemented in Perl; it is portable to all platforms and applicable to both nucleotide and protein input data. Treephyler is freely available for download at http://www.gobics.de/fabian/treephyler.php.
Fabian Schreiber, Peter Gumrich, Rolf Daniel, Peter Meinicke
Bioinform.3
2008 Gene prediction in metagenomic fragments: A large scale machine learning approach
abstract
BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is an approach to the characterization of microbial genomes via the direct isolation of genomic sequences from the environment without prior cultivation. The amount of metagenomic sequence data is growing fast while computational methods for metagenome analysis are still in their infancy. In contrast to genomic sequences of single species, which can usually be assembled and analyzed by many available methods, a large proportion of metagenome data remains as unassembled anonymous sequencing reads. One of the aims of all metagenomic sequencing projects is the identification of novel genes. Short length, for example, Sanger sequencing yields on average 700 bp fragments, and unknown phylogenetic origin of most fragments require approaches to gene prediction that are different from the currently available methods for genomes of single species. In particular, the large size of metagenomic samples requires fast and accurate methods with small numbers of false positive predictions. RESULTS: We introduce a novel gene prediction algorithm for metagenomic fragments based on a two-stage machine learning approach. In the first stage, we use linear discriminants for monocodon usage, dicodon usage and translation initiation sites to extract features from DNA sequences. In the second stage, an artificial neural network combines these features with open reading frame length and fragment GC-content to compute the probability that this open reading frame encodes a protein. This probability is used for the classification and scoring of gene candidates. With large scale training, our method provides fast single fragment predictions with good sensitivity and specificity on artificially fragmented genomic DNA. Additionally, this method is able to predict translation initiation sites accurately and distinguishes complete from incomplete genes with high reliability. CONCLUSION: Large scale machine learning methods are well-suited for gene prediction in metagenomic DNA fragments. In particular, the combination of linear discriminants and neural networks is promising and should be considered for integration into metagenomic analysis pipelines. The data sets can be downloaded from the URL provided (see Availability and requirements section).
Katharina Jasmin Hoff, Maike Tech, Thomas Lingner, Rolf Daniel, Burkhard Morgenstern, Peter Meinicke
BMC Bioinform.4