Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Charles Blatti
dblp:81/11009
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-4683-6271ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene co-expression analysis
co-expression module detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Comparison of single and module-based methods for modeling gene regulatory networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Comparison of single and module-based methods for modeling gene regulatory networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference › gene regulatory network inference
module network inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Comparison of single and module-based methods for modeling gene regulatory networks · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SigMat: a classification scheme for gene signature matching · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
sample classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SigMat: a classification scheme for gene signature matching · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics
biological network analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Characterizing gene sets using discriminative random walks with restart on heterogeneous biological networks · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
gene set enrichment analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Characterizing gene sets using discriminative random walks with restart on heterogeneous biological networks · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
gene function prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Characterizing gene sets using discriminative random walks with restart on heterogeneous biological networks · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Characterizing gene sets using discriminative random walks with restart on heterogeneous biological networks · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational bayes · 0.4sparse regression · 0.4transfer learning · 0.3similarity scoring · 0.3multi-way classification · 0.3random walk with restart · 0.2heterogeneous network analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Comparison of single and module-based methods for modeling gene regulatory networksabstractMOTIVATION: Gene regulatory networks describe the regulatory relationships among genes, and developing methods for reverse engineering these networks is an ongoing challenge in computational biology. The majority of the initially proposed methods for gene regulatory network discovery create a network of genes and then mine it in order to uncover previously unknown regulatory processes. More recent approaches have focused on inferring modules of co-regulated genes, linking these modules with regulatory genes and then mining them to discover new molecular biology. RESULTS: In this work we analyze module-based network approaches to build gene regulatory networks, and compare their performance to single gene network approaches. In the process, we propose a novel approach to estimate gene regulatory networks drawing from the module-based methods. We show that generating modules of co-expressed genes which are predicted by a sparse set of regulators using a variational Bayes method, and then building a bipartite graph on the generated modules using sparse regression, yields more informative networks than previous single and module-based network approaches as measured by: (i) the rate of enriched gene sets, (ii) a network topology assessment, (iii) ChIP-Seq evidence and (iv) the KnowEnG Knowledge Network collection of previously characterized gene-gene interactions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is written in R and can be downloaded from https://github.com/mikelhernaez/linker. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Mikel Hernaez, Charles Blatti, Olivier Gevaert |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2018 | SigMat: a classification scheme for gene signature matchingabstractMotivation: Several large-scale efforts have been made to collect gene expression signatures from a variety of biological conditions, such as response of cell lines to treatment with drugs, or tumor samples with different characteristics. These gene signature collections are utilized through bioinformatics tools for 'signature matching', whereby a researcher studying an expression profile can identify previously cataloged biological conditions most related to their profile. Signature matching tools typically retrieve from the collection the signature that has highest similarity to the user-provided profile. Alternatively, classification models may be applied where each biological condition in the signature collection is a class label; however, such models are trained on the collection of available signatures and may not generalize to the novel cellular context or cell line of the researcher's expression profile. Results: We present an advanced multi-way classification algorithm for signature matching, called SigMat, that is trained on a large signature collection from a well-studied cellular context, but can also classify signatures from other cell types by relying on an additional, small collection of signatures representing the target cell type. It uses these 'tuning data' to learn two additional parameters that help adapt its predictions for other cellular contexts. SigMat outperforms other similarity scores and classification methods in identifying the correct label of a query expression profile from as many as 244 or 500 candidate classes (drug treatments) cataloged by the LINCS L1000 project. SigMat retains its high accuracy in cross-cell line applications even when the amount of tuning data is severely limited. Availability and implementation: SigMat is available on GitHub at https://github.com/JinfengXiao/SigMat. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jinfeng Xiao, Charles Blatti, Saurabh Sinha 0002 |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2016 | Characterizing gene sets using discriminative random walks with restart on heterogeneous biological networksabstractMOTIVATION: Analysis of co-expressed gene sets typically involves testing for enrichment of different annotations or 'properties' such as biological processes, pathways, transcription factor binding sites, etc., one property at a time. This common approach ignores any known relationships among the properties or the genes themselves. It is believed that known biological relationships among genes and their many properties may be exploited to more accurately reveal commonalities of a gene set. Previous work has sought to achieve this by building biological networks that combine multiple types of gene-gene or gene-property relationships, and performing network analysis to identify other genes and properties most relevant to a given gene set. Most existing network-based approaches for recognizing genes or annotations relevant to a given gene set collapse information about different properties to simplify (homogenize) the networks. RESULTS: We present a network-based method for ranking genes or properties related to a given gene set. Such related genes or properties are identified from among the nodes of a large, heterogeneous network of biological information. Our method involves a random walk with restarts, performed on an initial network with multiple node and edge types that preserve more of the original, specific property information than current methods that operate on homogeneous networks. In this first stage of our algorithm, we find the properties that are the most relevant to the given gene set and extract a subnetwork of the original network, comprising only these relevant properties. We then re-rank genes by their similarity to the given gene set, based on a second random walk with restarts, performed on the above subnetwork. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm for ranking genes related to Drosophila embryonic development and aggressive responses in the brains of social animals. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DRaWR was implemented as an R package available at veda.cs.illinois.edu/DRaWR. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Charles Blatti, Saurabh Sinha 0002 |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2010 | Thermodynamics-Based Models of Transcriptional Regulation by Enhancers: The Roles of Synergistic Activation, Cooperative Binding and Short-Range RepressionabstractQuantitative models of cis-regulatory activity have the potential to improve our mechanistic understanding of transcriptional regulation. However, the few models available today have been based on simplistic assumptions about the sequences being modeled, or heuristic approximations of the underlying regulatory mechanisms. We have developed a thermodynamics-based model to predict gene expression driven by any DNA sequence, as a function of transcription factor concentrations and their DNA-binding specificities. It uses statistical thermodynamics theory to model not only protein-DNA interaction, but also the effect of DNA-bound activators and repressors on gene expression. In addition, the model incorporates mechanistic features such as synergistic effect of multiple activators, short range repression, and cooperativity in transcription factor-DNA binding, allowing us to systematically evaluate the significance of these features in the context of available expression data. Using this model on segmentation-related enhancers in Drosophila, we find that transcriptional synergy due to simultaneous action of multiple activators helps explain the data beyond what can be explained by cooperative DNA-binding alone. We find clear support for the phenomenon of short-range repression, where repressors do not directly interact with the basal transcriptional machinery. We also find that the binding sites contributing to an enhancer's function may not be conserved during evolution, and a noticeable fraction of these undergo lineage-specific changes. Our implementation of the model, called GEMSTAT, is the first publicly available program for simultaneously modeling the regulatory activities of a given set of sequences. Xin He 0001, Md. Abul Hassan Samee, Charles Blatti, Saurabh Sinha 0002 |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |