Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Lickteig
dblp:81/2067
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 16 · 10 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › complexity classes
probabilistic complexity classes |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | On real Turing machines that toss coins · STOC 1995 |
Computational complexity › computational models
real computation |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | On real Turing machines that toss coins · STOC 1995 |
Computational complexity
algebraic complexity |
0.0 | 2 | 1989 | A Lower Bound on the Complexity of Division in Finite Extension Fields and Inversion in Quadratic Alternative Algebras · SIAM J. Comput. 1989 The Computational Complexity of Division in Quadratic Extension Fields · SIAM J. Comput. 1987 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › boolean circuits
inversion complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | A Lower Bound on the Complexity of Division in Finite Extension Fields and Inversion in Quadratic Alternative Algebras · SIAM J. Comput. 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
real turing machines · 0.0probabilistic complexity · 0.0ostrowski complexity · 0.0lower bound criterion · 0.0multiplication complexity · 0.0algebraic complexity · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Festschrift in honor of Arnold Scho"nhage
Thomas Lickteig |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 2001 | Sylvester-Habicht Sequences and Fast Cauchy Index Computation
Thomas Lickteig, Marie-Françoise Roy |
J. Symb. Comput. | 1 |
| 2000 | Preface
Felipe Cucker, Thomas Lickteig |
J. Complex. | 2 |
| 1997 | Semi-algebraic Complexity--Additive Complexity of Matrix Computational Tasks
Thomas Lickteig, Klaus Meer |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1996 | Semi-algebraic Complexity of Quotients and Sign Determination of Remainders
Thomas Lickteig, Marie-Françoise Roy |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1995 | On real Turing machines that toss coinsabstractIn this paper we consider real counterparts of classical probabilistic complexity classes in the framework of real Turing machines as introduced by Blum, Shub, and Smale [2].We give an extension of the well-known "BPP ~P/poly" result from discrete complexity theory to a very general setting in the real number model.This result holds for real inputs, real outputs, and random elements drawn from an arbitrary probability distribution over lR~.Then we turn to the study of Boolean parts, that is, classes of languages of zero-one vectors accepted by real machines.In particular we show that the classes BPP, PP, PH, and PSPACE are not enlarged by allowing the use of real constants and arithmetic at unit cost provided we restrict branching to equality tests. Felipe Cucker, Marek Karpinski, Pascal Koiran, Thomas Lickteig, Kai Werther |
STOC | 4 |
| 1995 | How can a Complex Square Root be Computed in an Optimal Way
Thomas Lickteig, Kai Werther |
Comput. Complex. | 1 |
| 1995 | A Note on Testing the Resultant
Thomas Lickteig, Klaus Meer |
J. Complex. | 1 |
| 1993 | On Randomized Semi-algebraic Test Complexity
Peter Bürgisser, Marek Karpinski, Thomas Lickteig |
J. Complex. | 3 |
| 1992 | Test complexity of generic polynomials
Peter Bürgisser, Thomas Lickteig, Michael Shub |
J. Complex. | 2 |
| 1991 | Some Computational Problems in Linear Algebra as Hard as Matrix Multiplication
Peter Bürgisser, Marek Karpinski, Thomas Lickteig |
Comput. Complex. | 3 |
| 1989 | A Lower Bound on the Complexity of Division in Finite Extension Fields and Inversion in Quadratic Alternative AlgebrasabstractLet k be a field. The author continues the work of Lickteig [SIAM J. Comput., 16 (1987), pp. 278–311 ] and extends it in two directions: (1) A lower bound on the Ostrowski complexity of division in a finite extension field $A \supset k:L_{{\text{DIV}}} \geqq 3[A:k] + \log _2 [B:k] - 2$, where $B \subset A$ is some simple extension of k of maximal degree. The proof combines the technique of adjoining intermediate results to the ground field [T. Lickteig, op, cit.] and lower bound criteria for approximative complexity recently obtained by Griesser [Theoret. Comput. Sci., 46 (1986), pp. 329–338]. (2) An optimal lower bound for the complexity of inversion in a quadratic alternative algebra A of dimension greater than or equal to $2,A \ne k \times k:L_{{\text{INV}}} = 2\dim A - {\text{index of the norm}}$. Thomas Lickteig |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 1989 | On the Order of Approximation in Approximative Triadic Decompositions of Tensors
Thomas Lehmkuhl, Thomas Lickteig |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 1987 | The Computational Complexity of Division in Quadratic Extension FieldsabstractWe show that, for any quadratic field extension $k \subset K$, the division in K requires exactly six essential multiplications and divisions over k. In particular, complex division in real arithmetic requires six multiplications and divisions. If additions and subtractions are counted as well, exactly nine operations are required if $k \subset K$ is a radical extension; otherwise ten operations are required. Thomas Lickteig |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 1986 | Gaussian Elimination is Optimal for Solving Linear Equations in Dimension Two
Thomas Lickteig |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 1 |
| 1984 | A Note on Border Rank
Thomas Lickteig |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 1 |