Abstract Cloud computing environments are now widely available and are being increasingly utilized for technical computing. They are also being touted for high‐performance computing (HPC) applications in science and engineering. For example, Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) Services offers specialized Cluster Compute instance types to run HPC applications. In this paper, we compare the performance characteristics of two Amazon EC2 HPC instance types with that of National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Pleiades supercomputer, an SGI® ICE™ cluster. For this study, we utilized the HPC Challenge kernels and the NAS Parallel Benchmarks along with four full‐scale applications from the repertoire of codes that are being used by NASA scientists and engineers. We compare the total runtime of these codes for varying number of cores. We also break out the computation and communication times for a subset of these applications to explore the effect of interconnect differences on the two systems. In general, the single node performance of the two platforms is equivalent. However, for most of the codes when scaling to larger core counts, the performance of the EC2 HPC instances generally lags that of Pleiades because of worse network performance of the former. In addition to analyzing application performance, we also briefly touch upon the overhead due to virtualization and the usability of cloud environments such as Amazon EC2. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A.

Intel recently introduced the Xeon Phi coprocessor based on the Many Integrated Core architecture featuring 60 cores with a peak performance of 1.0 Tflop/s. NASA has deployed a 128-node SGI Rackable system where each node has two Intel Xeon E2670 8-core Sandy Bridge processors along with two Xeon Phi 5110P coprocessors. We have conducted an early performance evaluation of the Xeon Phi. We used microbenchmarks to measure the latency and bandwidth of memory and interconnect, I/O rates, and the performance of OpenMP directives and MPI functions. We also used OpenMP and MPI versions of the NAS Parallel Benchmarks along with two production CFD applications to test four programming modes: offload, processor native, coprocessor native and symmetric (processor plus coprocessor). In this paper we present preliminary results based on our performance evaluation of various aspects of a Phi-based system.

Resource sharing in commodity multicore processors can have a significant impact on the performance of production applications. In this paper we use a differential performance analysis methodology to quantify the costs of contention for resources in the memory hierarchy of several multicore processors used in high-end computers. In particular, by comparing runs that bind MPI processes to cores in different patterns, we can isolate the effects of resource sharing. We use this methodology to measure how such sharing affects the performance of four applications of interest to NASA-OVERFLOW, MITgcm, Cart3D, and NCC. We also use a subset of the HPCC benchmarks and hardware counter data to help interpret and validate our findings. We conduct our study on high-end computing platforms that use four different quad-core microprocessors-Intel Clovertown, Intel Harpertown, AMD Barcelona, and Intel Nehalem-EP. The results help further our understanding of the requirements these codes place on their production environments and also of each computer's ability to deliver performance.

Suitability of the next generation of high-performance computing systems for petascale simulations will depend on a balance between factors such as processor performance, memory performance, local and global network performance, and Input/Output (I/O) performance. As the supercomputing industry develops new technologies for these subsystems, achieving system balance becomes challenging. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of a newly introduced dual-core-based SGI Altix 4700 system and we compare its performance with that of a single-core-based SGI Altix 3700 Bx2 system. We used the High-Performance Computing Challenge (HPCC) benchmarks and five real-world applications, three from computational fluid dynamics, one from climate modeling and one from nanotechnology. Our study shows that the SGI Altix 4700 performs slightly better than the SGI Altix 3700 Bx2 up to 128 processors, while the performance of the systems is almost the same beyond 128 processors, when the communication time dominates the compute time.

The suitability of next-generation high-performance computing systems for petascale simulations will depend on various performance factors attributable to processor, memory, local and global network, and input/output characteristics. In this paper, we evaluate performance of new dual-core SGI Altix 4700, quad-core SGI Altix ICE 8200, and dual-core IBM POWER5+ systems. To measure performance, we used micro-benchmarks from High Performance Computing Challenge (HPCC), NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB), and four real-world applications- three from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and one from climate modeling. We used the micro-benchmarks to develop a controlled understanding of individual system components, then analyzed and interpreted performance of the NPBs and applications. We also explored the hybrid programming model (MPI+OpenMP) using multi-zone NPBs and the CFD application OVERFLOW-2. Achievable application performance is compared across the systems. For the ICE platform, we also investigated the effect of memory bandwidth on performance by testing 1, 2, 4, and 8 cores per node.

Columbia is a 10,240-processor supercluster consisting of 20 Altix nodes with 512 processors each, and currently ranked as one of the fastest computers in the world. In this paper, we present the performance characteristics of Columbia obtained on up to four computing nodes interconnected via the InfiniBand and/or NUMAlink4 communication fabrics. We evaluate floatingpoint performance, memory bandwidth, message passing communication speeds, and compilers using a subset of the HPC Challenge benchmarks, and some of the NAS Parallel Benchmarks including the multi-zone versions. We present detailed performance results for three scientific applications of interest to NASA, one from molecular dynamics, and two from computational fluid dynamics. Our results show that both the NUMAlink4 and In- finiBand interconnects hold promise for multi-node application scaling to at least 2048 processors.

The growing gap between sustained and peak performance for scientific applications is a well-known problem in high-performance computing. The recent development of parallel vector systems offers the potential to reduce this gap for many computational science codes and deliver a substantial increase in computing capabilities. This paper examines the intranode performance of the NEC SX-6 vector processor, and compares it against the cache-based IBM Power3 and Power4 superscalar architectures, across a number of key scientific computing areas. First, we present the performance of a microbenchmark suite that examines many low-level machine characteristics. Next, we study the behavior of the NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Finally, we evaluate the performance of several scientific computing codes. Overall results demonstrate that the SX-6 achieves high performance on a large fraction of our application suite and often significantly outperforms the cache-based architectures. However, certain classes of applications are not easily amenable to vectorization and would require extensive algorithm and implementation reengineering to utilize the SX-6 effectively. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The growing gap between sustained and peak performance for scientific applications is a well-known problem in high end computing. The recent development of parallel vector systems offers the potential to bridge this gap for many computational science codes and deliver a substantial increase in comput-ing capabilities. This paper examines the intranode performance of the NEC SX-6 vector processor and the cache-based IBM Power3/4 superscalar architectures across a number of scientific computing areas. First, we present the performance of a microbenchmark suite that examines low-level machine characteristics. Next, we study the behavior of the NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Finally, we evaluate the performance of several scientific computing codes. Results demonstrate that the SX-6 achieves high performance on a large fraction of our applications and often significantly outperforms the cache-based architectures. However, certain applications are not easily amenable to vectorization and would require extensive algorithm and implementation reengineering to utilize the SX-6 effectively.