Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jim Roskind

dblp:81/3941 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Transport protocols and congestion control · 87% Internet architecture and protocols · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Web and mobile security · 77% Systems and software security · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transport protocols and congestion control
QUIC
0.312017
The QUIC Transport Protocol: Design and Internet-Scale Deployment · SIGCOMM 2017
Transport protocols and congestion control
transport protocol design
0.312017
The QUIC Transport Protocol: Design and Internet-Scale Deployment · SIGCOMM 2017
Web and mobile security › mobile security
mobile code security
0.011997
Ensuring Assurance in Mobile Computing · S&P 1997
Systems and software security › trusted computing
trusted execution
0.011997
Ensuring Assurance in Mobile Computing · S&P 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative experimentation · 0.3panel discussion · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 The QUIC Transport Protocol: Design and Internet-Scale Deployment
abstract
We present our experience with QUIC, an encrypted, multiplexed, and low-latency transport protocol designed from the ground up to improve transport performance for HTTPS traffic and to enable rapid deployment and continued evolution of transport mechanisms. QUIC has been globally deployed at Google on thousands of servers and is used to serve traffic to a range of clients including a widely-used web browser (Chrome) and a popular mobile video streaming app (YouTube). We estimate that 7% of Internet traffic is now QUIC. We describe our motivations for developing a new transport, the principles that guided our design, the Internet-scale process that we used to perform iterative experiments on QUIC, performance improvements seen by our various services, and our experience deploying QUIC globally. We also share lessons about transport design and the Internet ecosystem that we learned from our deployment.
Adam Langley, Alistair Riddoch, Alyssa Wilk, Antonio Vicente, Charles Krasic, Fedor Kouranov, Ian Swett, Janardhan R. Iyengar, Jeff Bailey, Jeremy Dorfman, Jim Roskind, Joanna Kulik, Patrik Westin, Raman Tenneti, Robbie Shade, Ryan Hamilton, Victor Vasiliev, Wan-Teh Chang, Zhongyi Shi
SIGCOMM13
1997 Ensuring Assurance in Mobile Computing
abstract
This paper introduces a panel discussion on establishing assurance evidence that mobile code applications perform as expected by the user, without the side effects that have been demonstrated as possible in constructed examples of malicious or "rogue" applets. The paper's principal authors, Schaefer and Pinsky, have been engaged in cooperative research with the JavaSoft community to gain understanding of the complexities of assurance for mobile code applications. The paper discusses part of this on-going research. The panel adds the voices and experience of a continuing researcher, Dean, and of active practitioners from the principal vendors of mobile-code-enabled (and enabling) products. The panel actively debates the issues of providing compelling assurance evidence relating to the control of such code.
Marvin Schaefer, Sylvan Pinsky, Drew Dean, Jim Roskind, Barbara Fox
S&P5