Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Matthias Mitschke

dblp:81/5116 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 55% Computational photography and imaging · 24% Virtual and augmented reality · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
camera calibration
0.012000
Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo System · CVPR 2000
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.011998
Efficient Query Refinement for Image Retrieval · CVPR 1998
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query refinement
0.011998
Efficient Query Refinement for Image Retrieval · CVPR 1998
Information retrieval
relevance feedback
0.011998
Efficient Query Refinement for Image Retrieval · CVPR 1998
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image retrieval
content-based image retrieval
0.011998
Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia retrieval › content-based retrieval
query-by-example
0.011998
Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › interactive retrieval
relevance feedback
0.011998
Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality display
0.012000
Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo System · CVPR 2000
Virtual and augmented reality › display
head-mounted display calibration
0.012000
Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo System · CVPR 2000
Image and video processing
feature representation
0.011998
Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stereo-based tracking · 0.0hand-eye calibration · 0.0relevance feedback · 0.0multiple image features · 0.0image signature combination · 0.0classification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Recovering the X-ray projection geometry for three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction with additional sensors: Attached camera versus external navigation system
Matthias Mitschke, Nassir Navab
Medical Image Anal.1
2000 Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo System
abstract
Recovering the projection geometry of an X-ray system or an augmented reality video see-through Head Mounted Display (HMD) are mathematically quite similar. Recent work in both medical imaging and augmented reality use external optical sensors in order to recover the motion of the imaging system. In this paper, we take the example of the recovery of an X-ray projection geometry. We show that the mathematical problem, which needs to be solved, is equivalent to the hand-eye calibration well studied in both computer vision and robotics community. We present a comparative study for the recovery of the motion and therefore projection, geometry using five different hand-eye calibration methods proposed in the literature. We compare the motion estimation results using expensive external stereo-based tracking systems with one obtained by using an integrated optical camera. The paper concludes by shouting that ever, if the motion estimation is more accurate when using an external sensor, the projection geometry is better estimated by the integrated optical camera. These results are of crucial importance to both medical imaging and augmented reality communities.
Matthias Mitschke, Nassir Navab
CVPR1
2000 Interventions under Video-Augmented X-Ray Guidance: Application to Needle Placement
Matthias Mitschke, Ali R. Bani-Hashemi, Nassir Navab
MICCAI1
1999 Camera-Augmented Mobile C-arm (CAMC) Application: 3D Reconstruction Using a Low-Cost Mobile C-arm
Nassir Navab, Matthias Mitschke, Oliver Schütz
MICCAI2
1998 Efficient Query Refinement for Image Retrieval
abstract
Although powerful image representations have been proposed for content-based image retrieval, most of the current systems are "rigid", i.e. they retrieve a fixed set of images as response to a given query and an image feature. In this paper, our goal is to introduce tools for making image retrieval systems more flexible. More precisely, we use multiple image features, and present in details a new relevance feedback technique that integrates the positive and negative examples provided by the user. Experimental results on various large databases show that the proposed technique is more performant than the standard relevance feedback approach.
Chahab Nastar, Matthias Mitschke, Christophe Meilhac
CVPR2
1998 Real-Time Face Recognition Using Feature Combination
Chahab Nastar, Matthias Mitschke
FG2
1998 Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System
abstract
A2thozgh pouleTful image TepT~entatiom have been proposed for cozienf-based image Tetieval, most of the cument systems aTe "tigid", i.e. they rettieve a fied set of images as Tesponse to a given que~and an image featuTe.We introduce S=fitaage, a useT-fiendly, genetic and flw-ble content-based image TetievaI system.Stiiatage wes the que~-by-sample appToach for ~ettieving images and integrate advanced ~eatuTessuch as image signatuTe combination, classification, multiple queti~and queq Refinement.The classic and advanced featuTes of SMiraage aTe detaild in the papeT.Stiiraage has been eztensive[y t~ted oz dozens of databas~and p~oauced ezcellent Tetm-evalTe-S-dts; a sample of Tetm"evaTau~ts h pr~ented here.
Chahab Nastar, Matthias Mitschke, Christophe Meilhac, Nozha Boujemaa
ACM Multimedia2
1998 Relevance feedback in Surfimage
abstract
Relevance feedback is one of the strong components of Surfimage, the INRIA content-based image retrieval system. Relevance feedback is about learning from user interaction, and is useful in tasks like query refinement and multiple queries. We present two relevance feedback techniques currently implemented in Surfimage.
Christophe Meilhac, Matthias Mitschke, Chahab Nastar
WACV2