VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthias Mitschke
dblp:81/5116
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 55% Computational photography and imaging · 24% Virtual and augmented reality · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational photography and imaging
camera calibration |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo System · CVPR 2000 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Efficient Query Refinement for Image Retrieval · CVPR 1998 |
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query refinement |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Efficient Query Refinement for Image Retrieval · CVPR 1998 |
Information retrieval
relevance feedback |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Efficient Query Refinement for Image Retrieval · CVPR 1998 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image retrieval
content-based image retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia retrieval › content-based retrieval
query-by-example |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › interactive retrieval
relevance feedback |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998 |
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality display |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo System · CVPR 2000 |
Virtual and augmented reality › display
head-mounted display calibration |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo System · CVPR 2000 |
Image and video processing
feature representation |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval System · ACM Multimedia 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stereo-based tracking · 0.0hand-eye calibration · 0.0relevance feedback · 0.0multiple image features · 0.0image signature combination · 0.0classification · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Recovering the X-ray projection geometry for three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction with additional sensors: Attached camera versus external navigation system
Matthias Mitschke, Nassir Navab |
Medical Image Anal. | 1 |
| 2000 | Recovering Projection Geometry: How a Cheap Camera Can Outperform an Expensive Stereo SystemabstractRecovering the projection geometry of an X-ray system or an augmented reality video see-through Head Mounted Display (HMD) are mathematically quite similar. Recent work in both medical imaging and augmented reality use external optical sensors in order to recover the motion of the imaging system. In this paper, we take the example of the recovery of an X-ray projection geometry. We show that the mathematical problem, which needs to be solved, is equivalent to the hand-eye calibration well studied in both computer vision and robotics community. We present a comparative study for the recovery of the motion and therefore projection, geometry using five different hand-eye calibration methods proposed in the literature. We compare the motion estimation results using expensive external stereo-based tracking systems with one obtained by using an integrated optical camera. The paper concludes by shouting that ever, if the motion estimation is more accurate when using an external sensor, the projection geometry is better estimated by the integrated optical camera. These results are of crucial importance to both medical imaging and augmented reality communities. Matthias Mitschke, Nassir Navab |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2000 | Interventions under Video-Augmented X-Ray Guidance: Application to Needle Placement
Matthias Mitschke, Ali R. Bani-Hashemi, Nassir Navab |
MICCAI | 1 |
| 1999 | Camera-Augmented Mobile C-arm (CAMC) Application: 3D Reconstruction Using a Low-Cost Mobile C-arm
Nassir Navab, Matthias Mitschke, Oliver Schütz |
MICCAI | 2 |
| 1998 | Efficient Query Refinement for Image RetrievalabstractAlthough powerful image representations have been proposed for content-based image retrieval, most of the current systems are "rigid", i.e. they retrieve a fixed set of images as response to a given query and an image feature. In this paper, our goal is to introduce tools for making image retrieval systems more flexible. More precisely, we use multiple image features, and present in details a new relevance feedback technique that integrates the positive and negative examples provided by the user. Experimental results on various large databases show that the proposed technique is more performant than the standard relevance feedback approach. Chahab Nastar, Matthias Mitschke, Christophe Meilhac |
CVPR | 2 |
| 1998 | Real-Time Face Recognition Using Feature Combination
Chahab Nastar, Matthias Mitschke |
FG | 2 |
| 1998 | Surfimage: A Flexible Content-Based Image Retrieval SystemabstractA2thozgh pouleTful image TepT~entatiom have been proposed for cozienf-based image Tetieval, most of the cument systems aTe "tigid", i.e. they rettieve a fied set of images as Tesponse to a given que~and an image featuTe.We introduce S=fitaage, a useT-fiendly, genetic and flw-ble content-based image TetievaI system.Stiiatage wes the que~-by-sample appToach for ~ettieving images and integrate advanced ~eatuTessuch as image signatuTe combination, classification, multiple queti~and queq Refinement.The classic and advanced featuTes of SMiraage aTe detaild in the papeT.Stiiraage has been eztensive[y t~ted oz dozens of databas~and p~oauced ezcellent Tetm-evalTe-S-dts; a sample of Tetm"evaTau~ts h pr~ented here. Chahab Nastar, Matthias Mitschke, Christophe Meilhac, Nozha Boujemaa |
ACM Multimedia | 2 |
| 1998 | Relevance feedback in SurfimageabstractRelevance feedback is one of the strong components of Surfimage, the INRIA content-based image retrieval system. Relevance feedback is about learning from user interaction, and is useful in tasks like query refinement and multiple queries. We present two relevance feedback techniques currently implemented in Surfimage. Christophe Meilhac, Matthias Mitschke, Chahab Nastar |
WACV | 2 |